Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2009

01-11-2009

The Maastricht social participation profile: development and clinimetric properties in older adults with a chronic physical illness

Auteurs: Godelief M. J. Mars, Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen, Marcel W. M. Post, Ireen M. Proot, Ilse Mesters, Jacques T. M. van Eijk

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and test the Maastricht Social Participation Profile (MSPP), an instrument measuring the actual social participation by older adults with a chronic physical illness, in accordance with their own definition of social participation.

Methods

The development process consisted of a number of steps, ending with a field test in two waves (n = 412 and n = 125) among a random sample of people older than 59 years with either COPD or diabetes mellitus. Reproducibility was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and smallest real differences at group level (SRDsgroup). Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with Pearson correlation coefficients between the MSPP and the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI).

Results

The MSPP consists of four indices: consumptive participation, formal social participation, informal social participation-acquaintances and informal social participation-family. Each index measured diversity and frequency of participation. ICCs ranged between 0.63 and 0.83. SRDsgroup ranged between 0.05 and 0.09. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported by the correlations between the MSPPfrequency and the FAI.

Conclusions

The MSPP has good validity and acceptable reproducibility. Its distinguishing features are its focus on actual social participation and the possibility to calculate both diversity and frequency scores.
vorige artikel The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis
volgende artikel SF-36 includes less Parkinson Disease (PD)-targeted content but is more responsive to change than two PD-targeted health-related quality of life measures
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Hoeymans, N., Timmermans, J. M., De Klerk, M. M. Y., De Boer, A. H., Deeg, D. J. H., Poppelaars, J. L., et al. (2005). Gezond actief: de relatie tussen ziekten, beperkingen en maatschappelijke participatie onder Nederlandse ouderen [Healthy and active: the relationship between disease, disability and social participation among elderly in the Netherlands]. Bilthoven: RIVM.
2.
De Boer, A. H. (Ed.). (2006). Rapportage ouderen 2006 [Report on the Elderly 2006]. Den Haag: SCP.
3.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
4.
van Campen, C. (Ed.). (2006). Gezond en wel met een beperking: Ervaren kwaliteit van leven en functioneren van mensen met langdurige lichamelijke beperkingen [Safe and sound with a disability: Experienced quality of life and functioning of people with chronic physical impairments]. Den Haag: SCP.
5.
Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Noreau, L. (2004). Is social participation associated with quality of life of older adults with physical disabilities? Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(20), 1206–1213.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Mars, G. M. J., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Mesters, I., Proot, I. M., & Van Eijk, J. T. M. (2008). Characteristics of social participation as defined by older adults with a chronic physical illness. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(17), 1298–1308.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Avlund, K., Holstein, B. E., Mortensen, E. L., & Schroll, M. (1999). Active life in old age. Combining measures of functional ability and social participation. Danish Medical Bulletin, 46, 345–349.PubMed
8.
9.
De Klerk, M. M. Y., & Eijsink, M. (1999). Maatschappelijke participatie [Social participation]. In M. M. Y. de Klerk & J. M. Timmermans (Eds.), Rapportage ouderen 1998 (pp. 147–184). Den Haag: SCP.
10.
Dalgard, O. S., & Håheim, L. L. (1998). Psychosocial risk factors and mortality: A prospective study with special focus on social support, social participation, and locus of control in Norway. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 476–481.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Lackner, J. B., Joseph, J. G., Ostrow, D. G., & Eshleman, S. (1993). The effects of social support on Hopkins symptom checklist-assessed depression and distress in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus-positive and -negative gay men. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181(10), 632–638.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Bukov, A., Maas, I., & Lampert, T. (2002). Social participation in very old age: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from BASE. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P510–P517.
13.
Mars, G. M. J., Proot, I. M., Janssen, P. P. M., Van Eijk, J. T. M., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (2007). How do people with COPD or diabetes type 2 experience autonomy? An exploratory study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(6), 485–493.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Van Eijk, J. T. M., & De Haan, M. (1998). Care for the chronically ill: the future role of health care professionals and their patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 35(3), 233–240.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Schaeffer, N. C., & Presser, S. (2003). The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 65–88.CrossRef
16.
Belli, R. F., Schwarz, N., Singer, E., & Talarico, J. (2000). Decomposition can harm the accuracy of behavioural frequency reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 295–308.CrossRef
17.
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports—how the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.CrossRef
18.
Porst, R. (2000). Question wording—Zur Formulierung von Fragebogen–Fragen. ZUMA How-to-Reihe, 2. Mannheim: ZUMA.
19.
Fowler, F. J. J. (2001). Why it is easy to write bad questions. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 48, 49–66.
20.
Rockwood, T. H., Sangster, R. L., & Dillman, D. A. (1997). The effect of response categories on questionnaire answers; context and mode effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(1), 118–140.CrossRef
21.
Lessler, J. T., & Forsyth, B. H. (1996). A coding system for appraising questionnaires. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 259–291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
22.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed) (Vols. 07–017) Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
23.
Esposito, J. L., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1997). Evaluating survey data: Making the transition from pretesting to quality assessment. In L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, & D. Trewin (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 541–571). New York: Wiley.
24.
Kurz, K., Prüfer, P., & Rexroth, M. (1999). Zur Validität von Fragen in standardisierten Erhebungen. Ergebnisse des Einsatzes eines kognitiven Pretestinterviews (On the validity of questions in standardised surveys. Results of a cognitive pretest interview). ZUMA-Nachrichten, 44(23), 83–107.
25.
SPSS for Windows, Rel. 12.0.1. (2003). SPSS Inc: Chicago.
26.
Lamers, F., Jonkers, C. C., Bosma, H., Diederiks, J. P., & Van Eijk, J. T. M. (2006). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention to reduce non-severe depression in chronically ill elderly patients: the design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN92331982]. BMC Public Health, 6, 161.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Van der Zee, K. I., & Sanderman, R. Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36: Een handleiding [Measuring general health with the RAND-36: a manual], Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken: Groningen.
29.
Schuling, J., De Haan, R., Limburg, M., & Groenier, K. H. (1993). The Frenchay activities index; assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke, 24(8), 1173–1177.PubMed
30.
Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12(2), 166–170.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.PubMedCrossRef
32.
De Vet, H. C. W., Bouter, L. M., Bezemer, P. D., & Beurskens, A. J. H. M. (2001). Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures: Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17(4), 479–487.PubMed
33.
Nichols, D. P. (1998). Choosing an intraclass correlation coefficient. SPSS Keywords, 67.
34.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., De Boer, M. R., Van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310.CrossRef
36.
37.
Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175.CrossRef
38.
Post, M. W. M., de Witte, L. P., Reichrath, E., Verdonschot, M. M., Wijlhuizen, G. J., & Perenboom, R. J. M. (2008). Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(8), 620–627.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Van Brakel, W. H., Anderson, A. M., Mutatkar, R. K., Bakirtzief, Z., Nicholls, P. G., Raju, M. S., et al. (2006). The participation scale: Measuring a key concept in public health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(4), 193–203.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Wilkie, R., Peat, G., Thomas, E., Hooper, H., & Croft, P. R. (2005). The Keele assessment of participation: A new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Quality of Life Research, 14(8), 1889–1899.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Noreau, L., Desrosiers, J., Robicaud, L., Fougeyrollas, P., Rochette, A., & Viscogliosi, C. (2004). Measuring social participation: Reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(6), 346–352.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Brown, M., Dijkers, M. P., Gordon, W. A., Ashman, T., Charatz, H., & Cheng, Z. (2004). Participation objective, participation subjective: A measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19(6), 459–481.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Cardol, M., De Haan, R. J., de Jong, B. A., Van den Bos, G. A. M., & De Groot, I. J. M. (2001). Psychometric properties of the ‘Impact on Participation and Autonomy’ (IPA) questionnaire. Archives of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(2), 210–216.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 165(2), 233–261.CrossRef
45.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
Turnbull, J. C., Kersten, P., Habib, M., McLellan, L., Mullee, M. A., & George, S. (2000). Validation of the Frenchay activities index in a general population aged 16 years and older. Archives of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(8), 1034–1038.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Maastricht social participation profile: development and clinimetric properties in older adults with a chronic physical illness
Auteurs
Godelief M. J. Mars
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen
Marcel W. M. Post
Ireen M. Proot
Ilse Mesters
Jacques T. M. van Eijk
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9537-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2009

Quality of Life Research 9/2009 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

The classification systems of the EQ-5D, the HUI II and the SF-6D: what do they have in common?

OriginalPaper

SF-36 includes less Parkinson Disease (PD)-targeted content but is more responsive to change than two PD-targeted health-related quality of life measures

OriginalPaper

The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis

OriginalPaper

Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience

OriginalPaper

Measuring health-related quality of life in population-based studies of coronary heart disease: comparing six generic indexes and a disease-specific proxy score

OriginalPaper

Gender-related traits, quality of life, and psychological adjustment among women with irritable bowel syndrome