Top

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Gepubliceerd in:

05-11-2015

The Application of Intensive Longitudinal Methods to Investigate Change: Stimulating the Field of Applied Family Research

Auteur: Katharine T. Bamberger

Gepubliceerd in: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review | Uitgave 1/2016

Abstract

The use of intensive longitudinal methods (ILM)—rapid in situ assessment at micro timescales—can be overlaid on RCTs and other study designs in applied family research. Particularly, when done as part of a multiple timescale design—in bursts over macro timescales—ILM can advance the study of the mechanisms and effects of family interventions and processes of family change. ILM confers measurement benefits in accurately assessing momentary and variable experiences and captures fine-grained dynamic pictures of time-ordered processes. Thus, ILM allows opportunities to investigate new research questions about intervention effects on within-subject (i.e., within-person, within-family) variability (i.e., dynamic constructs) and about the time-ordered change process that interventions induce in families and family members beginning with the first intervention session. This paper discusses the need and rationale for applying ILM to family intervention evaluation, new research questions that can be addressed with ILM, example research using ILM in the related fields of basic family research and the evaluation of individual-based interventions. Finally, the paper touches on practical challenges and considerations associated with ILM and points readers to resources for the application of ILM.

vorige artikel Why are Religiousness and Spirituality Associated with Externalizing Psychopathology? A Literature Review

volgende artikel Antecedent Strategies to Promote Children’s and Adolescents’ Compliance with Adult Requests: A Review of the Literature

*Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. (1998). Weekly rhythms of parents’ work stress, home stress, and parent–adolescent tension. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 82, 53–67.PubMedCrossRef

Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Chandler, A. L. (1999). Daily transmission of tensions between marital dyads and parent–child dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 49–61.CrossRef

*Bai, S., & Repetti, R. L. (2015). Short-term resilience processes in the family. Family Relations, 64, 108–119. doi:10.1111/fare.12101.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Bamberger, K. T., & Coatsworth, J. D. (2013, May). An expanded conceptual model of participant engagement for prevention and intervention research. Poster presented at the Society for Prevention Research 21st Annual Conference in San Francisco, CA.

Bamberger, K. T., Coatsworth, J. D., Fosco, G. M., & Ram, N. (2014). Change in participant engagement during a family-based preventive intervention: Ups and downs with time and tension. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 811–820.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Bamberger, K. T., Coatsworth, J. D., & Ram, N. (2014, May). Change in family systems: Tracking family functioning through intensive daily data collected during interventions. Poster presented at the Society for Prevention Research 22nd Annual Conference in Washington, DC. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1377.3925.

Barnett, M. L., Niec, L. N., & Acevedo-Polakovich, I. D. (2014). Assessing the key to effective coaching in parent–child interaction therapy: The therapist-parent interaction coding system. Journal of Psychopathology Behavioral Assessment, 36, 211–223. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9396-8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Barrera, M, Jr, & Sandler, I. N. (2006). Prevention: A report of progress and momentum into the future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(3), 221–226.

Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multi-level models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.PubMedCrossRef

Birditt, K. S., Nevitt, M. R., & Almeida, D. M. (2014). Daily interpersonal coping strategies: Implications for self-reported well-being and cortisol. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 687–706. doi:10.1177/0265407514542726.CrossRef

Bjørknes, R., Kjøbli, J., Manger, T., & Jakobsen, R. (2012). Parent training among ethnic minorities: Parenting practices as mediators of chance in child conduct problems. Family Relations, 61, 101–114.CrossRef

*Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.PubMedCrossRef

*Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.CrossRef

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1997). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.

Burns, M. N., Begale, M., Duffecy, J., Gergle, D., Karr, C. J., Giangrande, E., & Mohr, D. C. (2011). Harnessing context sensing to develop a mobile intervention for depression. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3), e55. doi:10.2196/jmir.1838.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Caruthers, A. S., Van Ryzin, M. J., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Preventing high-risk sexual behavior in early adulthood with family interventions in adolescence: Outcomes and developmental processes. Prevention Science, 15, S59–S69. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0383-9.PubMedCrossRef

Chorpita, B. F., Reise, S., Weisz, J. R., Grubbs, K., Becker, K. D., Krull, J. L., & The Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2010). Evaluation of the brief problem checklist: Child and caregiver interviews to measure clinical progress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 526–536. doi:10.1037/a0019602.PubMedCrossRef

Chow, S.-M., Mattson, W. I., & Messinger, D. S. (2014). Representing trends and moment-to-moment variability in dyadic and family processes using state-space modeling techniques. In S. M. McHale, P. Amato, and A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 39–55). National Symposium on Family Research. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0.

Chung, G. H., Flook, L., & Fuligni, A. J. (2009). Daily family conflict and emotional distress among adolescents from Latin American, Asian, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1406–1415.PubMedCrossRef

Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528.PubMedCrossRef

Collins, R. L., Morsheimer, E. T., Shiffman, S., Paty, J. A., Gnys, M., & Papandonatos, G. D. (1998). Ecological momentary assessment in a behavioral drinking moderation training program. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(3), 306–315.PubMedCrossRef

Conner, T. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Trends in ambulatory self-report: The role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 327–337. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182546f18.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.PubMedCrossRef

Curtis, N. M., Ronan, K. R., & Borduin, C. M. (2004). Mutlisystemic treatment: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 411–419. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.411.PubMedCrossRef

DeGarmo, D. S., Patterson, G. R., & Forgatch, M. S. (2004). How do outcomes in a specified parent training intervention maintain or wane over time? Prevention Science, 5(2), 73–89.PubMedCrossRef

*Diehl, M., Hooker, K., & Sliwinski, M. J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of intraindividual variability across the life span. New York, NY: Routledge.

Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Intervening in children’s lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(2), 115–152.PubMedCrossRef

Elfeddali, I., Bolman, C., & de Vries, H. (2012). SQ4U—A computer tailored smoking relapse prevention program incorporating planning strategy assignments and multiple feedback time points after the quit-attempt: Development and design protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 33, 151–158.PubMedCrossRef

Ferrer, E., & Helm, J. L. (2013). Dynamical systems modeling of physiological coregulation in dyadic interactions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 296–308. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.013.PubMedCrossRef

Forbes, E. E., Stepp, S. D., Dahl, R. E., Ryan, N. D., Whalen, D., Axelson, D. A., & Silk, J. S. (2012). Real-world affect and social context as predictors of treatment response in child and adolescent depression and anxiety: An ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 22, 37–47. doi:10.1089/cap.2011.0085.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Forgatch, M. S. (1994). Parenting through change: A programmed intervention curriculum for groups of single mothers. Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.

Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., Degarmo, D. S., & Beldavs, Z. G. (2009). Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9 year followup of the Oregon Divorce Study. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 637–660. doi:10.1017/S0954579409000340.PubMedCrossRef

Fosco, G. M., Bumbarger, B., & Bamberger, K. T. (2015). Thinking systematically for enduring family change. In M. J. Van Ryzin, K. L. Kumpfer, G. M. Fosco, & M. T. Greenberg (Eds.), Family-based prevention programs for children and adolescents: Theory, research, and large-scale dissemination (pp. 308–328). New York: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press.

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 305–318. doi:10.1017/S0954579413001004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Fritz, M. S. (2014). An exponential decay model for mediation. Prevention Science, 15, 611–622. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0390-x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Fuligni, A. J. (2014). The benefits and challenges of modeling intra-family variability in dyadic and family processes using state-space modeling techniques. In S. M. McHale, P. Amato, and A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 57–69). National Symposium on Family Research. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0.

Granic, I., Dishion, T., & Hollenstein, T. (2003a). The family ecology of adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective on normative development. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 60–91). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2003b). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606–617.PubMedCrossRef

Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., & McDonald, D. A. (2002). Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Family Relations, 51, 28–36.CrossRef

Guttentag, C. L. (2014). Using live coaching and video feedback to teach responsive parenting skills: Experience from the PALS project. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5(1), article 5. http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol5/iss1/5.

Hedeker, D., Mermelstein, R. J., & Demirtas, H. (2012). Modeling between-subject and within-subject variances in ecological momentary assessment data using mixed-effects location scale models. Statistics in Medicine, 31, 3328–3336. doi:10.1002/sim.5338.PubMedCrossRef

*Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412984201.

Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2010). Ecological momentary interventions: Incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behavior treatments. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 1–39.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Ho, J., & Intille, S. S. (2005). Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In CHI conference proceedings, April 2–7, 2005, 909–918.

Holtrop, K., Parra-Cardona, J. R., & Forgatch, M. S. (2014). Examining the process of change in an evidence-based parent training intervention: A qualitative study grounded in the experiences of participants. Prevention Science, 15, 745–756. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0401-y.PubMedCrossRef

Institute of Medicine. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. In M. E. O’Connell, T. Boat, & K. E. Warner (Eds.), Board on children, and families, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Kazdin, A. E. (2004). Evidence-based treatments: Challenges and priorities for practice and research. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 923–940.PubMedCrossRef

Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27.PubMedCrossRef

Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065.PubMedCrossRef

Larson, R., & Almeida, D. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 5–20.CrossRef

*Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86.PubMedCrossRef

Laurenceau, J. P., & Bolger, N. (2012). Analyzing diary and intensive longitudinal data from dyads. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 407–422). New York, NY: Guilford.

Leijten, P., Dishion, T. J., Thomaes, S., Raaijmakers, M. A. J., Orobio de Castro, B., & Matthys, W. (2015). Bringing parenting interventions back to the future: How randomized microtrials may benefit parenting intervention efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22, 47–57. doi:10.1111/cpsp.12087.

*Mehl, M. R., & Conner, T. S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford.

Merrilees, C. E., Goeke-Morey, M., & Cummings, E. M. (2008). Do event-contingent diaries about marital conflict change marital interactions? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 253–262. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.11.007.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.

Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (1994). Reducing risk for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(3), 221–226.

Myin-Germeys, I., Birchwood, M., & Kwapii, T. (2011). From environment to therapy in psychosis: A real-world momentary assessment approach. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 244–247. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbq164.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and the woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Downs, L. Liben, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of aesthetics, the environment & development: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event—and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771–785.CrossRef

Olds, D. L. (2012). Improving the life changes of vulnerable children and families with prenatal and infancy support of parents: The nurse–family partnership. Psychosocial Intervention, 12, 129–143. doi:10.5093/in2012a14.CrossRef

Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2007). Guided interaction in pre-school settings. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 23(1), 14–21.CrossRef

Poulin, F., Nadeau, K., & Scaramella, L. V. (2012). The role of parents in young adolescents’ competence with peers: An observational study of advice giving and intrusiveness. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58(4), 437–462.CrossRef

Ram, N., & Diehl, M. (2015). Multiple-time-scale design and analysis: Pushing toward real-time modeling of complex developmental processes. In M. Diehl, K. Hooker, & M. J. Sliwinski (Eds.), Handbook of Intraindividual variability across the life span (pp. 308–323). New York, NY: Routledge.

*Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

*Ram, N., & Grimm, K. (2007). Using simple and complex growth models to articulate developmental change: Matching theory to method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 303–316. doi:10.1177/0165025407077751.CrossRef

Ram, N., Shiyko, M., Lunkenheimer, E. S., Doerksen, S., & Conroy, D. (2014). Families as coordinated symbiotic systems: Making use of nonlinear dynamic models. In S. McHale, P. Amato, & A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 19–37). NY: Springer.CrossRef

Repetti, R. L. (1987). Linkages between work and family roles. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 7, 98–127.

Repetti, R. L., Reynolds, B. M., & Sears, M. S. (2015). Families under the microscope: Repeated sampling of perceptions, experiences, biology, and behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 126–146. doi:10.1111/jomf.12143.CrossRef

Riley, W. T., Rivera, D. E., Atienza, A. A., Nilsen, W., Allison, S. M., & Mermelstein, R. (2011). Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: Are our theories up to the task? Translational Behavioral Medicine, 1, 53–71.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Robbins, M. L., & Kubiak, T. (2014). Ecological momentary assessment in behavioral medicine: Research and practice. In D. Mostovsky (Ed.), The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 429–446). New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRef

Robles, T. F., Reynolds, B. M., Repetti, R. L., & Chung, P. J. (2013). Using daily diaries to study family settings, emotions, and health in everyday life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 179–188. doi:10.1177/0265407512457102.CrossRef

Rofey, D. L., Hull, E. E., Phillips, J., Vogt, K., Silk, J. S., & Dahl, R. E. (2010). Utilizing ecological momentary assessment in pediatric obesity to quantify behavior, emotion, and sleep. Obesity, 18, 1270–1272. doi:10.1038/oby.2009.483.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Swendeman, D., & Chorpita, B. F. (2012). Disruptive innovations for designing and diffusing evidence-based interventions. American Psychologist, 67(6), 463–476.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Runyan, J. D., Steenbergh, T. A., Bainbridge, C., Daugherty, D. A., Oke, L., & Fry, B. N. (2013). A smartphone ecological momentary assessment/intervention “App” for collecting real-time data and promoting self-awareness. PLoS ONE, 8(8), 1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071325.CrossRef

Sameroff, A. J., & Fiese, B. H. (2000). Transactional regulation: The developmental ecology of early intervention. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp. 135–139). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Sameroff, A. J., & MacKenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 613–640.PubMedCrossRef

Sandler, I. N., Schoenfelder, E. N., Wolchik, S. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: Lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299–329. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131619.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Saxbe, D., & Repetti, R. L. (2010). For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 92–103.PubMedCrossRef

Schermerhorn, A. C., Chow, S.-M., & Cummings, E. M. (2010). Developmental family processes and interparental conflict: Patterns of microlevel influences. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 869–885.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Schermerhorn, A. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2008). Transactional family dynamics: A new framework for conceptualizing family influence processes. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 187–250.PubMedCrossRef

Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2007). The analysis of real-time momentary data: A practical guide. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 76–116). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Schwarz, N. (2007). Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 11–26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Scott, S. B., Sliwinski, M. J., Mogle, J. A., & Almeida, D. M. (2014). Age, stress, and emotional complexity: Results from two studies of daily experiences. Psychology and Aging, 29, 577–587. doi:10.1037/a0037282.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Shiffman, S. (2007). Designing protocols for ecological momentary assessment. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 27–53). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

*Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.PubMedCrossRef

Silk, J. S., Tan, P. Z., Ladouceur, C. D., Meller, S., Siegle, G. J., McMakin, D. L., et al. (under review). A randomized clinical trial comparing individual cognitive behavioral therapy and child-centered therapy for child anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.

Sin, N. L., Graham-Engeland, J. E., & Almeida, D. M. (2015). Daily positive events and inflammation: Findings from the National Study of Daily Experiences. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 43, 130–138. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2014.07.015.PubMedCrossRef

*Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). Measurement-burst designs for social health research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 245–261. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00043.x.CrossRef

*Smyth, J. M., & Heron, K. E. (2014). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in family research. In S. McHale, P. Amato, & A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 145–161). NY: Springer.CrossRef

*Smyth, J. M., & Stone, A. A. (2003). Ecological momentary assessment research in behavioral medicine. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 35–52.CrossRef

Society for Ambulatory Assessment. (2014). Home. http://www.saa2009.org.

Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Greenberg, M., Leaf, P., Brown, C. H., Fagan, A., et al. (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework. Prevention Science, 14, 319–351. doi:10.1007/s11121-012-0362-6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19.CrossRef

Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 199–202.

*Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Atienza, A. A., & Nebeling, L. (Eds.). (2007). The science of real time data capture: Self-reports in health research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Teachman, J. (2014). Latent growth curve models with random and fixed effects. In S. M. McHale, P. Amato, and A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 3–17). National Symposium on Family Research. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0.

Telzer, E. H., & Fuligni, A. J. (2009). Daily family assistance and the psychological well-being of adolescents from Latin American, Asian, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1177–1189. doi:10.1037/a0014728.PubMedCrossRef

Telzer, E. H., & Fuligni, A. J. (2013). Positive daily family interactions eliminate gender differences in internalizing symptoms among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1498–1511.PubMedCrossRef

Thomas, R., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). Behavioral outcomes of parent–child interaction therapy and triple P—Positive parenting program: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 35, 475–495. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9104-9.CrossRef

Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using experience sampling methods/ecological momentary assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 21, 457–462.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

*Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2013). Ambulatory assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 151–176.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Van Ryzin, M. J., & Nowicka, P. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of a family-based intervention in early adolescence on parent–youth relationship quality, late adolescent health, and early adult obesity. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 106–116. doi:10.1037/a0031428.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Voogt, C. V., Kuntsche, E., Kleinjan, M., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2014). The effect of the ‘What Do You Drink’ web-based brief alcohol intervention of self-efficacy to better understand changes in alcohol use over time: Randomized controlled trial using ecological momentary assessment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 138, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.009.PubMedCrossRef

*Walls, T. A., & Schafer, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Models for intensive longitudinal data. Oxford: New York, NY.

Weisner, T. S. (2002). Ecocultural understanding of children’s developmental pathways. Human Development, 45, 275–281.CrossRef

Weisner, T. S. (2010). Well being, chaos, and culture: Sustaining a meaningful daily routine. In G. W. Evans & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Chaos and its influence on children’s development: An ecological perspective. Decade of behavior (pp. 211–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12057-013.CrossRef

Weisner, T. S., Matheson, C., Coots, J., & Bernheimer, L. P. (2005). Sustainability of daily routines as a family outcome. In A. E. Maynard & M. I. Martini (Eds.), Learning in cultural context (pp. 41–73). NY: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef

Weisz, J. R., Sandler, I. N., Durlak, J. A., & Anton, B. S. (2005). Promoting and protecting youth mental health through evidence-based prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 60, 628–648.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: The Application of Intensive Longitudinal Methods to Investigate Change: Stimulating the Field of Applied Family Research
Auteur: Katharine T. Bamberger
Publicatiedatum: 05-11-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review / Uitgave 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1096-4037
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2827
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-015-0194-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen