Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

04-03-2023 | Review

Stepfamily Roles, Relationships, and Dynamics: A Review of Stepfamily Typologies

Auteurs: Lawrence H. Ganong, Caroline Sanner

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 11/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Typologies allow researchers and clinicians to look efficiently across studies and draw conclusions about commonalities and differences related to populations of interest. Typologies also are useful in developing and testing theories. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of 34 typologies related to stepfamilies and stepfamily relationships. The 34 reviewed typologies were developed based on empirical evidence and contained 127 unique stepfamily or relational types. They were created in 10 countries over 33 years with samples varying widely in size (11 to 1,934) and family position (i.e., stepchildren, parents, and stepparents). Data were gathered in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method designs. From these typologies we identified five general content areas: (1) perceptions of family membership, (2) stepfamily organization, (3) stepparent roles, (4) stepfamily communication and cohesion, and (5) dyadic relationship quality. Despite variability of methods, contexts, and foci, analyses revealed consistencies in relational dynamics and family processes across content areas. That is, individuals define and perceive their own and other’s family roles in specific ways that reflect distinct world views about their families, and they interact and communicate with each other in ways that reflect those family world views. These typologies show that stepfamily members interact within a limited range of family paradigms: (1) nuclear family models, (2) stepfamily models, and (3) reductive/rejection models. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Literatuur
go back to reference Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., & Nicholson, J. H. (1999). Turning points in the development of blended families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(3), 291–313.CrossRef Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., & Nicholson, J. H. (1999). Turning points in the development of blended families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(3), 291–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Berger, R. (1995). Three types of stepfamilies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 24(1), 35–49. Berger, R. (1995). Three types of stepfamilies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 24(1), 35–49.
go back to reference Braithwaite, D., Olson, L., Golish, T., Soukup, C., & Turman, P. (2001). “Becoming a family”: developmental processes represented in blended family discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 221–247.CrossRef Braithwaite, D., Olson, L., Golish, T., Soukup, C., & Turman, P. (2001). “Becoming a family”: developmental processes represented in blended family discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 221–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Bray, J., & Kelly, J. (1998). Stepfamilies. New York: Broadway. Bray, J., & Kelly, J. (1998). Stepfamilies. New York: Broadway.
go back to reference Burgoyne, J., & Clark, D. (1984). Making a Go of It. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Burgoyne, J., & Clark, D. (1984). Making a Go of It. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
go back to reference Castrén, A. M., & Widmer, E. D. (2015). Insiders and outsiders in stepfamilies: Adults’ and children’s views on family boundaries. Current Sociology, 63, 35–56.CrossRef Castrén, A. M., & Widmer, E. D. (2015). Insiders and outsiders in stepfamilies: Adults’ and children’s views on family boundaries. Current Sociology, 63, 35–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Church, E. (1999). Who are the people in your family? Stepmothers’ diverse notions of kinship. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 31(1/2), 83–105.CrossRef Church, E. (1999). Who are the people in your family? Stepmothers’ diverse notions of kinship. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 31(1/2), 83–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Clingempeel, W. G., Flesher, M., & Brand, E. (1988). Research on stepfamilies: Paradigmatic constraints and alternative proposals. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention: Assessment and theory. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Clingempeel, W. G., Flesher, M., & Brand, E. (1988). Research on stepfamilies: Paradigmatic constraints and alternative proposals. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention: Assessment and theory. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
go back to reference Constantine, L. (1986). Family paradigms. NY: Guilford. Constantine, L. (1986). Family paradigms. NY: Guilford.
go back to reference Erera-Weatherley, P. (1996). On becoming a stepparent: Factors associated with the adoption of alternative stepparenting styles. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 25, 155–175.CrossRef Erera-Weatherley, P. (1996). On becoming a stepparent: Factors associated with the adoption of alternative stepparenting styles. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 25, 155–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Funder, K. (1991). Children’s construction of their post-divorce families: A family sculpture approach. In K.R. Funder (Ed.), Images of Australian families. Melbourne, AU: Longman Cheshire. Funder, K. (1991). Children’s construction of their post-divorce families: A family sculpture approach. In K.R. Funder (Ed.), Images of Australian families. Melbourne, AU: Longman Cheshire.
go back to reference Ganong, L., Coleman, M., Fine, M., & Martin, P. (1999). Stepparents’ affinity-seeking and affinity-maintaining strategies with stepchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 20(3), 299–327.CrossRef Ganong, L., Coleman, M., Fine, M., & Martin, P. (1999). Stepparents’ affinity-seeking and affinity-maintaining strategies with stepchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 20(3), 299–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (2017). Stepfamily Relationships (2nd ed). NY: Springer. Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (2017). Stepfamily Relationships (2nd ed). NY: Springer.
go back to reference Golish, T. D. (2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Understanding the ties that bind. Human Communication Research, 29(1), 41–80. Golish, T. D. (2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Understanding the ties that bind. Human Communication Research, 29(1), 41–80.
go back to reference Gross, P. (1987). Defining post-divorce remarriage families: A typology based on the subjective perceptions of children. Journal of Divorce, 10(1–2), 205–217.CrossRef Gross, P. (1987). Defining post-divorce remarriage families: A typology based on the subjective perceptions of children. Journal of Divorce, 10(1–2), 205–217.CrossRef
go back to reference Kellas, J. K., Baxter, L., LeClair-Underberg, C., Thatcher, M., Routsong, T., Normand, E. L., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Telling the story of stepfamily beginnings: The relationship between young-adult stepchildren’s stepfamily origin stories and their satisfaction with the stepfamily. Journal of Family Communication, 14(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.864294.CrossRef Kellas, J. K., Baxter, L., LeClair-Underberg, C., Thatcher, M., Routsong, T., Normand, E. L., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Telling the story of stepfamily beginnings: The relationship between young-adult stepchildren’s stepfamily origin stories and their satisfaction with the stepfamily. Journal of Family Communication, 14(2), 149–166. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​15267431.​2013.​864294.CrossRef
go back to reference King, V. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of adolescents’ relationships with stepfathers and nonresident fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 910–928.CrossRefPubMed King, V. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of adolescents’ relationships with stepfathers and nonresident fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 910–928.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference King, V. (2007). When children have two mothers: Relationships with nonresident mothers, stepmothers, and fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1178–1193.CrossRef King, V. (2007). When children have two mothers: Relationships with nonresident mothers, stepmothers, and fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1178–1193.CrossRef
go back to reference Klee, L., Schmidt, C., & Johnson, C. (1989). Children’s definitions of family following divorce of their parents. Journal of Divorce, 12(2-3), 107–127.CrossRef Klee, L., Schmidt, C., & Johnson, C. (1989). Children’s definitions of family following divorce of their parents. Journal of Divorce, 12(2-3), 107–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Levin, I. (1997). Stepfamily as project. Marriage and Family Review, 26(1/2), 123–133.CrossRef Levin, I. (1997). Stepfamily as project. Marriage and Family Review, 26(1/2), 123–133.CrossRef
go back to reference Levin, I. (1995). Children’s perceptions of their family. In J. Brannen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Childhood and parenthood. London, UK: Institute of Education. Levin, I. (1995). Children’s perceptions of their family. In J. Brannen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Childhood and parenthood. London, UK: Institute of Education.
go back to reference McCubbin, H. I., & McCubbin, M. A. (1988). Typologies of resilient families: Emerging roles of social class and ethnicity. Family Relations, 37(July), 247–254.CrossRef McCubbin, H. I., & McCubbin, M. A. (1988). Typologies of resilient families: Emerging roles of social class and ethnicity. Family Relations, 37(July), 247–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Nozawa, S. (2015). Remarriage and stepfamilies. In Stella R. Quah (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Families in Asia, pp. 345-358. London: Routledge. Nozawa, S. (2015). Remarriage and stepfamilies. In Stella R. Quah (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Families in Asia, pp. 345-358. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Pasley, K., & Ihinger-Tallman, M. (1982). Remarried family life: Supports and constraints. In G. Rowe (Ed.), Building family strengths 4 (pp. 367-383). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press. Pasley, K., & Ihinger-Tallman, M. (1982). Remarried family life: Supports and constraints. In G. Rowe (Ed.), Building family strengths 4 (pp. 367-383). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.
go back to reference Spruijt, E. (1997). Stepfamily lifestyles and adolescent well-being in The Netherlands. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 26(3/4), 137–153.CrossRef Spruijt, E. (1997). Stepfamily lifestyles and adolescent well-being in The Netherlands. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 26(3/4), 137–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Lear, C. A., Koerner, A., & Allen, D. M. (2006). Relationship typologies. In A.L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, (pp. 91-110). NY: Cambridge. Van Lear, C. A., Koerner, A., & Allen, D. M. (2006). Relationship typologies. In A.L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, (pp. 91-110). NY: Cambridge.
go back to reference Visher, E. B., & Visher, J. S. (1980). Stepfamilies: Myths and realities. Secus, NC: Citadel. Visher, E. B., & Visher, J. S. (1980). Stepfamilies: Myths and realities. Secus, NC: Citadel.
go back to reference Wald, E. (1981). The remarried family. NY: Family Service Association of America. Wald, E. (1981). The remarried family. NY: Family Service Association of America.
go back to reference Weaver, S., & Coleman, M. (2005). A mothering but not a mother role: A grounded theory study of the nonresidential stepmother role. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 477–497.CrossRef Weaver, S., & Coleman, M. (2005). A mothering but not a mother role: A grounded theory study of the nonresidential stepmother role. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 477–497.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Stepfamily Roles, Relationships, and Dynamics: A Review of Stepfamily Typologies
Auteurs
Lawrence H. Ganong
Caroline Sanner
Publicatiedatum
04-03-2023
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 11/2023
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02558-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2023

Journal of Child and Family Studies 11/2023 Naar de uitgave