Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander hoofdstuk

2010 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

11. Stand van zaken rond digitale beeldvorming

Auteur: B. Vandenberghe

Gepubliceerd in: Het Tandheelkundig Jaar 2010

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Sinds de komst van de computer was er ook in de tandheelkunde - parallel aan de digitalisering van onze maatschappij - sprake van een snelle ontwikkeling van nieuwe technologieën. De moderne praktijk is een geïntegreerde digitale werkomgeving waar de computer met gegevensnetwerk centraal staan. Met het digitale patiëntendossier is het mogelijk digitale beelden - zowel radiografische als fotografische - efficiënt op te slaan, te bewerken en te presenteren aan de geïnteresseerde patiënt. De intraorale camera met beeldscherm aan de stoel, de digitale röntgensensoren die via USB-aansluiting of draadloos op het gegevensnetwerk aansluiten, de optische scanning van kroonpreparaties voor CAD/CAM-restauraties of digitale occlusiemodellen wijzen op een stroomversnelling in de orale beeldvorming, waar diagnostiek, optimale visualisatie en lage stralingsdosis centraal staan. Bij aanschouwing van het elektromagnetisch spectrum valt te zien dat niet alleen het gebruik van ioniserende straling maar ook van niet-ioniserende straling centraal staat in de technologische vooruitgang van de orale beeldvorming (afb. 11.1).
Literatuur
go back to reference Analoui M. Radiographic image enhancement. Part I: spatial domain techniques. Review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:1–9. PubMedCrossRef Analoui M. Radiographic image enhancement. Part I: spatial domain techniques. Review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:1–9. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Araki K, Endo A, Okano T. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29:76–80. PubMedCrossRef Araki K, Endo A, Okano T. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29:76–80. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Berkhout WER, Beuger DA, Sanderink GCH, Stelt PF van der. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;1–5. Berkhout WER, Beuger DA, Sanderink GCH, Stelt PF van der. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;1–5.
go back to reference Borg E. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Swed Dent J 1994;139:s1–s67. Borg E. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Swed Dent J 1994;139:s1–s67.
go back to reference Chiu HL, Lin SH, Chen CH, Wang WC, Chen JY et al. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial imaging department. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:749–56. PubMedCrossRef Chiu HL, Lin SH, Chen CH, Wang WC, Chen JY et al. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial imaging department. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:749–56. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference European Commission. The European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology, The safe use of radiographs in dental practices., Radiation protection 136, Brussels 2004. European Commission. The European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology, The safe use of radiographs in dental practices., Radiation protection 136, Brussels 2004.
go back to reference Farman AG. Raiding standards: digital interoperability and DICOM. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:525–6. PubMedCrossRef Farman AG. Raiding standards: digital interoperability and DICOM. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:525–6. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:485–9. PubMedCrossRef Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:485–9. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Farman AG, Levato CM, Gane D, Scarfe WC. How going digital will affect the dental office. J Okla Dent Assoc 2008;99:16–21. PubMed Farman AG, Levato CM, Gane D, Scarfe WC. How going digital will affect the dental office. J Okla Dent Assoc 2008;99:16–21. PubMed
go back to reference Hellen-Halme K, Petersson A, Warfvinge G, Nilsson M. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:380–4 PubMedCrossRef Hellen-Halme K, Petersson A, Warfvinge G, Nilsson M. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:380–4 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Inglese JM, Farman TT, Farman AG. The sixth generation: introduction of two new high fill factor complementary metal oxide semiconductor (or SuperCMOS) intra-oral x-ray detectors. CARS 2004:1152–6. Inglese JM, Farman TT, Farman AG. The sixth generation: introduction of two new high fill factor complementary metal oxide semiconductor (or SuperCMOS) intra-oral x-ray detectors. CARS 2004:1152–6.
go back to reference Ludlow JB, Abreu Jr M. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1999;28:26–30 PubMedCrossRef Ludlow JB, Abreu Jr M. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 1999;28:26–30 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McDavid WD, Welander U, Pillai BK, Morris CR. The Intrex: a constant-potential x-ray unit for periapical dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53:433–6. PubMedCrossRef McDavid WD, Welander U, Pillai BK, Morris CR. The Intrex: a constant-potential x-ray unit for periapical dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53:433–6. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mol A. Image processing tools for dental applications. Review Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:299–318. Mol A. Image processing tools for dental applications. Review Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:299–318.
go back to reference Petrikowski CG. Introducing digital radiography in the dental office: an overview. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:651. PubMed Petrikowski CG. Introducing digital radiography in the dental office: an overview. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:651. PubMed
go back to reference Pfeiffer P, Schmage P, Nergiz I, Platzer U. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images. Quintessence Int 2000;31:257–60. PubMed Pfeiffer P, Schmage P, Nergiz I, Platzer U. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images. Quintessence Int 2000;31:257–60. PubMed
go back to reference Roberts MW, Mol A. Clinical techniques to reduce sensor plate damage in PSP digital radiography. J Dent Child 2004;71:169–70. Roberts MW, Mol A. Clinical techniques to reduce sensor plate damage in PSP digital radiography. J Dent Child 2004;71:169–70.
go back to reference Stelt PF van der. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:7S–13S. PubMed Stelt PF van der. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:7S–13S. PubMed
go back to reference White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation, 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2004. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation, 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2004.
Metagegevens
Titel
Stand van zaken rond digitale beeldvorming
Auteur
B. Vandenberghe
Copyright
2010
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-7510-3_11