Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 1/2013

01-03-2013 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Specific Objectivity of Mindfulness—A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory

Auteurs: Sebastian Sauer, Matthias Ziegler, Erik Danay, John Ives, Niko Kohls

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 1/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Even as modern research on mindfulness has expanded, debate continues with regard to the measurement and conceptualization of mindfulness. This divergence has manifested in a proliferation of different measurement approaches. The present research contributes to the advancement of mindfulness measurement by performing a Rasch model analysis of the psychometric properties of the short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14). This rigorous psychometric method belongs to the family item response theory and can be considered to be a set of approaches complementing classical test theory. The FMI-14 was administered to a nonclinical convenience sample of N = 1,452 German adults. Our data showed poor fit to the Rasch model. A reanalysis of the model excluding one particular misfitting item (number 13) yielded an acceptable fit for the originally proposed one-factorial solution to the Rasch model. However, a two-factorial solution with the subfacets “presence” and “acceptance” provided a better overall fit than the unidimensional solution. Some degree of differential item functioning could be observed both in the uni- and two-dimensional solution suggesting that potential exists for improving the measurement quality of the FMI-13. In line with the recent research, it is concluded that the FMI-13 should be considered as a two-dimensional rather than a unidimensional instrument.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. CrossRef Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. CrossRef
go back to reference Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Egan, V. (2006). Individual differences in response scale use: mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1235–1245. CrossRef Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Egan, V. (2006). Individual differences in response scale use: mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1235–1245. CrossRef
go back to reference Baer, R. A. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. PubMedCrossRef Baer, R. A. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. PubMedCrossRef Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. CrossRef Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. CrossRef
go back to reference Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: LEA. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: LEA.
go back to reference Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. PubMedCrossRef Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1(1), 11–34. Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1(1), 11–34.
go back to reference Cardaciotto, L. A., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204. PubMedCrossRef Cardaciotto, L. A., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eid, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2007). Detecting response styles and faking in personality and organizational assessments by mixed Rasch models. Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. doi: 10.​1007/​978-0-387-49839-3_​16. Eid, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2007). Detecting response styles and faking in personality and organizational assessments by mixed Rasch models. Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. doi: 10.​1007/​978-0-387-49839-3_​16.
go back to reference Eisendrath, S. J., Delucchi, K., Bitner, R., Fenimore, P., Smit, M., & McLane, M. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 77(5), 319–320. PubMedCrossRef Eisendrath, S. J., Delucchi, K., Bitner, R., Fenimore, P., Smit, M., & McLane, M. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 77(5), 319–320. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: LEA. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: LEA.
go back to reference Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Rasch models: foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Rasch models: foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. PubMedCrossRef Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gray, J. A. (1994). Three fundamental emotion systems. In D. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: fundamental questions (pp. 243–247). New York: Oxford University Press. Gray, J. A. (1994). Three fundamental emotion systems. In D. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: fundamental questions (pp. 243–247). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040. PubMedCrossRef Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N. T. (2011). Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(01), 219–239. CrossRef Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N. T. (2011). Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(01), 219–239. CrossRef
go back to reference Höfling, V., Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Heidenreich, T. (2011). Mindfulness or mindlessness? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 59–64. CrossRef Höfling, V., Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Heidenreich, T. (2011). Mindfulness or mindlessness? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 59–64. CrossRef
go back to reference Kohls, N., Sauer, S., & Walach, H. (2009). Facets of mindfulness—results of an online study investigating the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 224–230. CrossRef Kohls, N., Sauer, S., & Walach, H. (2009). Facets of mindfulness—results of an online study investigating the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 224–230. CrossRef
go back to reference Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341. PubMedCrossRef Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Linacre, J. M. (2010). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS, MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Winsteps. Linacre, J. M. (2010). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS, MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.
go back to reference Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 810–819. PubMedCrossRef Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 810–819. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. CrossRef Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. CrossRef
go back to reference Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: critical history of a methodological concept. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: critical history of a methodological concept. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Offenbächer, M., Sauer, S., Hieblinger, R., Hufford, D. J., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011). Spirituality and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: content comparison of questionnaires measuring mindfulness based on the International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25–26), 2434–2445. PubMed Offenbächer, M., Sauer, S., Hieblinger, R., Hufford, D. J., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011). Spirituality and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: content comparison of questionnaires measuring mindfulness based on the International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25–26), 2434–2445. PubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42. PubMedCrossRef Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Raîche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes in standardized residual principal components analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(1), 1012. Raîche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes in standardized residual principal components analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(1), 1012.
go back to reference Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44(1), 75–92. CrossRef Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44(1), 75–92. CrossRef
go back to reference Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & Von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed Rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences. New York: Waxmann. Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & Von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed Rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences. New York: Waxmann.
go back to reference Sauer, S., Lynch, S., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011a). Dialectics of mindfulness: implications for Western medicine. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 10. PubMedCrossRef Sauer, S., Lynch, S., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011a). Dialectics of mindfulness: implications for Western medicine. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 10. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sauer, S., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011b). Gray’s behavioural inhibition system as a mediator of mindfulness towards well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(4), 506–551. CrossRef Sauer, S., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011b). Gray’s behavioural inhibition system as a mediator of mindfulness towards well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(4), 506–551. CrossRef
go back to reference Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Horan, M., & Kohls, N. (2011c). Implicit and explicit emotional behavior and mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1558–1569. PubMedCrossRef Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Horan, M., & Kohls, N. (2011c). Implicit and explicit emotional behavior and mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1558–1569. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., et al. (2012). Assessment of mindfulness: review on state of the art. Mindfulness. doi: 10.​1007/​s12671-012-0122-5. Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., et al. (2012). Assessment of mindfulness: review on state of the art. Mindfulness. doi: 10.​1007/​s12671-012-0122-5.
go back to reference Shapiro, S. L., Bootzin, R. R., Figueredo, A. J., Lopez, A. M., & Schwartz, G. E. (2003). The efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in the treatment of sleep disturbance in women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54(1), 85–91. PubMedCrossRef Shapiro, S. L., Bootzin, R. R., Figueredo, A. J., Lopez, A. M., & Schwartz, G. E. (2003). The efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in the treatment of sleep disturbance in women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54(1), 85–91. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386. PubMedCrossRef Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith, R. M., & Miao, C. Y. (1994). Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: theory into practice (vol. 2). Greenwich: Ablex. Smith, R. M., & Miao, C. Y. (1994). Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: theory into practice (vol. 2). Greenwich: Ablex.
go back to reference Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. CrossRef Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. CrossRef
go back to reference Zickar, M. J., Gibby, R. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Uncovering faking samples in applicant, incumbent, and experimental data sets: an application of mixed-model item response theory. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 168–190. CrossRef Zickar, M. J., Gibby, R. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Uncovering faking samples in applicant, incumbent, and experimental data sets: an application of mixed-model item response theory. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 168–190. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Specific Objectivity of Mindfulness—A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
Auteurs
Sebastian Sauer
Matthias Ziegler
Erik Danay
John Ives
Niko Kohls
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0145-y