Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2024

15-06-2023 | Research

Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective

Auteurs: Aman Bedi, Paul N. Russell, William S. Helton

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

In the current investigation, we modified the high Go, low No-Go Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) by replacing the single response on Go trials with a dual response to increase response uncertainty. In three experiments, a total of 80 participants completed either the original SART with no response uncertainty regarding the Go stimuli, or versions of the dual response SART in which response probabilities for the two possible responses to the Go stimuli varied from 0.9–0.1, 0.7–0.3, to 0.5–0.5. This resulted in a scale of increasing response uncertainty based on information theory to the Go stimuli. The probability of No-Go withhold stimuli was kept.11 in all experiments. Using the Signal Detection Theory perspective proposed by Bedi et al. (Psychological Research: 1–10, 2022), we predicted that increasing response uncertainty would result in a conservative response bias shift, noted by decreased errors of commission and slower response times to both Go and No-Go stimuli. These predictions were verified. The errors of commission in the SART may not be a measures of conscious awareness per se, but instead indicative of the level of participant trigger happiness—the willingness to respond quickly.
Literatuur
go back to reference Aitken, J. A., Pagan, O., Wong, C. M., Bayley, B., Helton, W. S., & Kaplan, S. A. (2023). Task-related and task-unrelated thoughts in runners and equestrians: Measurement issues in evaluations of thought content. Applied Ergonomics, 110, 104011.PubMedCrossRef Aitken, J. A., Pagan, O., Wong, C. M., Bayley, B., Helton, W. S., & Kaplan, S. A. (2023). Task-related and task-unrelated thoughts in runners and equestrians: Measurement issues in evaluations of thought content. Applied Ergonomics, 110, 104011.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baddeley, A. D., & Colquhoun, W. P. (1969). Signal probability and vigilance: A reappraisal of the ‘signal-rate’effect. British Journal of Psychology, 60(2), 169–178.PubMedCrossRef Baddeley, A. D., & Colquhoun, W. P. (1969). Signal probability and vigilance: A reappraisal of the ‘signal-rate’effect. British Journal of Psychology, 60(2), 169–178.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bedi, A., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2023). Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: A signal detection theory perspective. Psychological Research, 87(2), 509–518.PubMedCrossRef Bedi, A., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2023). Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: A signal detection theory perspective. Psychological Research, 87(2), 509–518.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bellgrove, M. A., Hawi, Z., Kirley, A., Gill, M., & Robertson, I. H. (2005). Dissecting the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype: Sustained attention, response variability and spatial attentional asymmetries in relation to dopamine transporter (DAT1) genotype. Neuropsychologia, 43(13), 1847–1857.PubMedCrossRef Bellgrove, M. A., Hawi, Z., Kirley, A., Gill, M., & Robertson, I. H. (2005). Dissecting the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype: Sustained attention, response variability and spatial attentional asymmetries in relation to dopamine transporter (DAT1) genotype. Neuropsychologia, 43(13), 1847–1857.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Blakely, M. J., Kemp, S., & Helton, W. S. (2016). Volitional running and tone counting: The impact of cognitive load on running over natural terrain. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2–3), 104–114.CrossRef Blakely, M. J., Kemp, S., & Helton, W. S. (2016). Volitional running and tone counting: The impact of cognitive load on running over natural terrain. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2–3), 104–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Carter, L., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2013). Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 82(1), 35–42.PubMedCrossRef Carter, L., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2013). Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 82(1), 35–42.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cheyne, J. A., Solman, G. J., Carriere, J. S., & Smilek, D. (2009). Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition, 111(1), 98–113.CrossRef Cheyne, J. A., Solman, G. J., Carriere, J. S., & Smilek, D. (2009). Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition, 111(1), 98–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21), 8719–8724.CrossRef Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21), 8719–8724.CrossRef
go back to reference Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.PubMedCrossRef Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dang, J. S., Figueroa, I. J., & Helton, W. S. (2018). You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: The sustained attention to response task does not measure sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 236(8), 2255–2262.PubMedCrossRef Dang, J. S., Figueroa, I. J., & Helton, W. S. (2018). You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: The sustained attention to response task does not measure sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 236(8), 2255–2262.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2021). A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 242–275.PubMedCrossRef Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2021). A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 242–275.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole.
go back to reference Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley.
go back to reference Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(1), 46–51.CrossRef Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(1), 46–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Hawkins, G. E., Mittner, M., Forstmann, B. U., & Heathcote, A. (2019). Modeling distracted performance. Cognitive Psychology, 112, 48–80.PubMedCrossRef Hawkins, G. E., Mittner, M., Forstmann, B. U., & Heathcote, A. (2019). Modeling distracted performance. Cognitive Psychology, 112, 48–80.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Head, J., & Helton, W. S. (2018). The troubling science of neurophenomenology. Experimental Brain Research, 236(9), 2463–2467.PubMedCrossRef Head, J., & Helton, W. S. (2018). The troubling science of neurophenomenology. Experimental Brain Research, 236(9), 2463–2467.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Head, J., Tenan, M. S., Tweedell, A. J., Wilson, K. M., & Helton, W. S. (2020). Response complexity reduces errors on a response inhibition task. Human Factors, 62(5), 787–799.PubMedCrossRef Head, J., Tenan, M. S., Tweedell, A. J., Wilson, K. M., & Helton, W. S. (2020). Response complexity reduces errors on a response inhibition task. Human Factors, 62(5), 787–799.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Helton, W. S. (2009). Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(1), 39–47.PubMedCrossRef Helton, W. S. (2009). Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(1), 39–47.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Helton, W. S., Dember, W. N., Warm, J. S., & Matthews, G. (1999). Optimism, pessimism, and false failure feedback: Effects on vigilance performance. Current Psychology, 18(4), 311–325.CrossRef Helton, W. S., Dember, W. N., Warm, J. S., & Matthews, G. (1999). Optimism, pessimism, and false failure feedback: Effects on vigilance performance. Current Psychology, 18(4), 311–325.CrossRef
go back to reference Helton, W. S., & Head, J. (2012). Earthquakes on the mind: Implications of disasters for human performance. Human Factors, 54(2), 189–194.PubMedCrossRef Helton, W. S., & Head, J. (2012). Earthquakes on the mind: Implications of disasters for human performance. Human Factors, 54(2), 189–194.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Helton, W. S., Jackson, K. M., Näswall, K., & Humphrey, B. (2022). The national aviation and space agency task load index (NASA-TLX): does it need updating? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 66, 1245–1249.CrossRef Helton, W. S., Jackson, K. M., Näswall, K., & Humphrey, B. (2022). The national aviation and space agency task load index (NASA-TLX): does it need updating? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 66, 1245–1249.CrossRef
go back to reference Helton, W. S., Weil, L., Middlemiss, A., & Sawers, A. (2010). Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the sustained attention to response task (SART). Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 77–85.PubMedCrossRef Helton, W. S., Weil, L., Middlemiss, A., & Sawers, A. (2010). Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the sustained attention to response task (SART). Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 77–85.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ho, M. C., Li, R. H., & Tang, T. C. (2015). Betel nut chewing effects on sustained attention and inhibitory control after sleep deprivation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 222–230.CrossRef Ho, M. C., Li, R. H., & Tang, T. C. (2015). Betel nut chewing effects on sustained attention and inhibitory control after sleep deprivation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 222–230.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the sustained attention to response task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 106–119.PubMedCrossRef Jackson, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the sustained attention to response task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 106–119.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, A. J., Muneem, M., & Miles, C. (2013). Chewing gum benefits sustained attention in the absence of task degradation. Nutritional Neuroscience, 16(4), 153–159.PubMedCrossRef Johnson, A. J., Muneem, M., & Miles, C. (2013). Chewing gum benefits sustained attention in the absence of task degradation. Nutritional Neuroscience, 16(4), 153–159.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kane, M. J., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Welhaf, M. S., & Phillips, N. E. (2021). Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2372–2411.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kane, M. J., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Welhaf, M. S., & Phillips, N. E. (2021). Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2372–2411.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Lo, J. C., Ong, J. L., Leong, R. L., Gooley, J. J., & Chee, M. W. (2016). Cognitive performance, sleepiness, and mood in partially sleep deprived adolescents: The need for sleep study. Sleep, 39(3), 687–698.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lo, J. C., Ong, J. L., Leong, R. L., Gooley, J. J., & Chee, M. W. (2016). Cognitive performance, sleepiness, and mood in partially sleep deprived adolescents: The need for sleep study. Sleep, 39(3), 687–698.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Lynn, S. K., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). “Utilizing” signal detection theory. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1663–1673.PubMedCrossRef Lynn, S. K., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). “Utilizing” signal detection theory. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1663–1673.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mackworth, N. H. (1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(1), 6–21.CrossRef Mackworth, N. H. (1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(1), 6–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Galloway, M., & Hawkins, K. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37(6), 661–670.PubMedCrossRef Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Galloway, M., & Hawkins, K. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37(6), 661–670.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McAvinue, L., O’Keeffe, F., McMackin, D., & Robertson, I. H. (2005). Impaired sustained attention and error awareness in traumatic brain injury: Implications for insight. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15(5), 569–587.PubMedCrossRef McAvinue, L., O’Keeffe, F., McMackin, D., & Robertson, I. H. (2005). Impaired sustained attention and error awareness in traumatic brain injury: Implications for insight. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15(5), 569–587.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 196–204.PubMed McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 196–204.PubMed
go back to reference McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “d’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 525–549.PubMed McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “d’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 525–549.PubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1521–1534. Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1521–1534.
go back to reference Miller, J., & Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101(2), 227–231.CrossRef Miller, J., & Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101(2), 227–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12(3), 442.PubMedCrossRef Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12(3), 442.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mueller, S. T., Alam, L., Funke, G. J., Linja, A., Ibne Mamun, T., & Smith, S. L. (2020). Examining methods for combining speed and accuracy in a Go/No-Go vigilance task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 64, 1202–1206.CrossRef Mueller, S. T., Alam, L., Funke, G. J., Linja, A., Ibne Mamun, T., & Smith, S. L. (2020). Examining methods for combining speed and accuracy in a Go/No-Go vigilance task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 64, 1202–1206.CrossRef
go back to reference Nuechterlein, K. H., Parasuraman, R., & Jiang, Q. (1983). Visual sustained attention: Image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time. Science, 220(4594), 327–329.PubMedCrossRef Nuechterlein, K. H., Parasuraman, R., & Jiang, Q. (1983). Visual sustained attention: Image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time. Science, 220(4594), 327–329.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D. R. (1976). Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 578–590.PubMed Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D. R. (1976). Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 578–590.PubMed
go back to reference Peebles, D., & Bothell, D. (2004). Modelling performance in the sustained attention to response task. In ICCM (pp. 231–236). Peebles, D., & Bothell, D. (2004). Modelling performance in the sustained attention to response task. In ICCM (pp. 231–236).
go back to reference Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., Souza, A. S., Von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2019). Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(8), 1335–1372.PubMedCrossRef Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., Souza, A. S., Von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2019). Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(8), 1335–1372.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758.PubMedCrossRef Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Seli, P. (2016). The attention-lapse and motor decoupling accounts of SART performance are not mutually exclusive. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 189–198.PubMedCrossRef Seli, P. (2016). The attention-lapse and motor decoupling accounts of SART performance are not mutually exclusive. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 189–198.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149.CrossRef Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Temple, J. G., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Jones, K. S., LaGrange, C. M., & Matthews, G. (2000). The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Human Factors, 42(2), 183–194.PubMedCrossRef Temple, J. G., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Jones, K. S., LaGrange, C. M., & Matthews, G. (2000). The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Human Factors, 42(2), 183–194.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Unsworth, N., Robison, M. K., & Miller, A. L. (2021). Individual differences in lapses of attention: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(7), 1303–1331.CrossRef Unsworth, N., Robison, M. K., & Miller, A. L. (2021). Individual differences in lapses of attention: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(7), 1303–1331.CrossRef
go back to reference Whyte, J., Grieb-Neff, P., Gantz, C., & Polansky, M. (2006). Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: Differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART). Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 2007–2014.PubMedCrossRef Whyte, J., Grieb-Neff, P., Gantz, C., & Polansky, M. (2006). Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: Differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART). Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 2007–2014.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, K. M., Finkbeiner, K. M., De Joux, N. R., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2016). Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task. Experimental Brain Research, 234(10), 2989–2998.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wilson, K. M., Finkbeiner, K. M., De Joux, N. R., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2016). Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task. Experimental Brain Research, 234(10), 2989–2998.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598.CrossRef Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective
Auteurs
Aman Bedi
Paul N. Russell
William S. Helton
Publicatiedatum
15-06-2023
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01847-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2024

Psychological Research 1/2024 Naar de uitgave