Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2006

01-11-2006 | Original Article

Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex

Auteurs: R. Marois, J. M. Larson, M. M. Chun, D. Shima

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2006

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

It is difficult to perform two tasks at the same time. Such performance limitations are exemplified by the psychological refractory period (PRP): when participants make distinct motor responses to two stimuli presented in rapid succession, the response to the second stimulus is increasingly slowed as the time interval between the two stimuli is decreased. This impairment is thought to reflect a central limitation in selecting the appropriate response to each stimulus, but not in perceptually encoding the stimuli. In the present study, it was sought to determine which brain regions are specifically involved in response selection under dual-task conditions by contrasting fMRI brain activity measured from a response selection manipulation that increased dual-task costs, with brain activity measured from an equally demanding manipulation that affected perceptual visibility. While a number of parieto-frontal areas involved in response selection were activated by both dual-task manipulations, the dorsal pre-motor cortex, and to a lesser extent the inferior frontal cortex, were specifically engaged by the response selection manipulation. These results suggest that the pre-motor cortex is an important neural locus of response selection limitation under dual-task situations.
Literatuur
go back to reference Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: some behaviorial and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In: Heuer H., Sanders A. F. (eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 395–419. Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: some behaviorial and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In: Heuer H., Sanders A. F. (eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 395–419.
go back to reference Arnell K. M., & Duncan J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognit Psychol 44:105–147.CrossRefPubMed Arnell K. M., & Duncan J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognit Psychol 44:105–147.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Boussaoud D. (2001). Attention versus intention in the primate pre-motor cortex. NeuroImage, 14: S40–45.CrossRefPubMed Boussaoud D. (2001). Attention versus intention in the primate pre-motor cortex. NeuroImage, 14: S40–45.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform, 21, 109–127.CrossRef Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform, 21, 109–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In: Shapiro K. (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. Oxford University Press, NewYork, pp. 20–35. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In: Shapiro K. (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. Oxford University Press, NewYork, pp. 20–35.
go back to reference De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 19, 965–980.CrossRef De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 19, 965–980.CrossRef
go back to reference Decary, A., & Richer, F. (1995). Response selection deficits in frontal excisions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1243–1253.CrossRefPubMed Decary, A., & Richer, F. (1995). Response selection deficits in frontal excisions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1243–1253.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., Alsop, D. C., Shin, R. K., Atlas, S., & Grossman, M. (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature, 378, 279–281.CrossRefPubMed D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., Alsop, D. C., Shin, R. K., Atlas, S., & Grossman, M. (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature, 378, 279–281.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dreher, J. C., & Grafman, J. (2003). Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 329–339.CrossRefPubMed Dreher, J. C., & Grafman, J. (2003). Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 329–339.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2002). Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate, Physiol & Behav, 77, 677–682.CrossRef Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2002). Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate, Physiol & Behav, 77, 677–682.CrossRef
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.CrossRefPubMed Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Cognitive Sci, 23, 475–483. Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Cognitive Sci, 23, 475–483.
go back to reference Durston, S., Davidson, M.C., Thomas, K.M., Worden, M.S., Tottenham, N., Martinez, A., Watts, R., Ulug, A.M., & Casey, B.J. (2003). Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 20, 2135–2141.CrossRefPubMed Durston, S., Davidson, M.C., Thomas, K.M., Worden, M.S., Tottenham, N., Martinez, A., Watts, R., Ulug, A.M., & Casey, B.J. (2003). Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 20, 2135–2141.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance Medicine, 33, 636–647. Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance Medicine, 33, 636–647.
go back to reference Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cognit Sci, 5, 10–16.CrossRef Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cognit Sci, 5, 10–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Neural activation during response competition. J Cognit Neurosci, 12, 118–129.CrossRef Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Neural activation during response competition. J Cognit Neurosci, 12, 118–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Herath, P., Klingberg, T., Young, J., Amunts, K., & Roland, P. (2001). Neural correlates of dual task interference can be dissociated from those of divided attention: an fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 796–805.CrossRefPubMed Herath, P., Klingberg, T., Young, J., Amunts, K., & Roland, P. (2001). Neural correlates of dual task interference can be dissociated from those of divided attention: an fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 796–805.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hernandez, A., Zainos, A., & Romo, R. (2002). Temporal evolution of a decision-making process in medial pre-motor cortex. Neuron, 33, 959–972.CrossRefPubMed Hernandez, A., Zainos, A., & Romo, R. (2002). Temporal evolution of a decision-making process in medial pre-motor cortex. Neuron, 33, 959–972.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ivry, R. B., Franz, E. A., Kingstone, A., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 24, 463–480.CrossRef Ivry, R. B., Franz, E. A., Kingstone, A., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 24, 463–480.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003a). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1082–1094. Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003a). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1082–1094.
go back to reference Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003b). Common neural mechanisms for response selection and perceptual processing. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1095–1110.CrossRef Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003b). Common neural mechanisms for response selection and perceptual processing. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1095–1110.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang, Y., Saxe, R. & Kanwisher, N. (2004) Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychol Sci 15, 390–396.CrossRefPubMed Jiang, Y., Saxe, R. & Kanwisher, N. (2004) Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychol Sci 15, 390–396.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jolicoeur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task-sub-1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014–1032. Jolicoeur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task-sub-1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014–1032.
go back to reference Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 25, 596–616.CrossRef Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 25, 596–616.CrossRef
go back to reference Jolicoeur, P., Dell’ Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. OU Press, New York, pp. 82–99. Jolicoeur, P., Dell’ Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. OU Press, New York, pp. 82–99.
go back to reference Kantowitz, B. H. (1974). Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Erlbaum, Potomac, pp. 83–131. Kantowitz, B. H. (1974). Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Erlbaum, Potomac, pp. 83–131.
go back to reference Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Q J Exp Psychol, 20, 167–178.PubMed Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Q J Exp Psychol, 20, 167–178.PubMed
go back to reference Kimura, D. (1993). Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. Oxford University Press, New York. Kimura, D. (1993). Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. Oxford University Press, New York.
go back to reference Kurata, K., Tsuji, T., Naraki, S., Seino, M., & Abe, Y. (2000). Activation of the dorsal pre-motor cortex and pre-supplementary motor area of humans during an auditory conditional motor task. J Neurophysiol, 84, 1667–1672.PubMed Kurata, K., Tsuji, T., Naraki, S., Seino, M., & Abe, Y. (2000). Activation of the dorsal pre-motor cortex and pre-supplementary motor area of humans during an auditory conditional motor task. J Neurophysiol, 84, 1667–1672.PubMed
go back to reference Lee, K. M., Chang, K.-H., & Roh, J. K. (1999). Subregions within the supplementary motor area activated at different stages of movement preparation and execution. NeuroImage, 9, 117–123.CrossRefPubMed Lee, K. M., Chang, K.-H., & Roh, J. K. (1999). Subregions within the supplementary motor area activated at different stages of movement preparation and execution. NeuroImage, 9, 117–123.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Luck, S. J. (1998). Sources of dual-task interference: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci, 9, 223–227.CrossRef Luck, S. J. (1998). Sources of dual-task interference: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci, 9, 223–227.CrossRef
go back to reference MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Marois, R., Chun, M. M., & Gore, J. C. (2000). Neural correlates of the attentional blink. Neuron, 28, 299–308.CrossRefPubMed Marois, R., Chun, M. M., & Gore, J. C. (2000). Neural correlates of the attentional blink. Neuron, 28, 299–308.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Marois, R., Chun, M. M., & Gore, J. C. (2004). A common parieto-frontal network is recruited under both low visibility and high perceptual interference. J Neurophysiol, 92, 2985–2992.CrossRefPubMed Marois, R., Chun, M. M., & Gore, J. C. (2004). A common parieto-frontal network is recruited under both low visibility and high perceptual interference. J Neurophysiol, 92, 2985–2992.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci, 24, 167–202.CrossRefPubMed Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci, 24, 167–202.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion. Cognit Psychol, 44, 193–251.CrossRefPubMed Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion. Cognit Psychol, 44, 193–251.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 19, 1292–1312.CrossRef Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 19, 1292–1312.CrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognit Psychol, 21, 469–514.CrossRef Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognit Psychol, 21, 469–514.CrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychol Bull, 116, 220–244.CrossRefPubMed Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychol Bull, 116, 220–244.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pashler, H. E. (1998). The Psychology of Attention. MIT, Cambridge. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The Psychology of Attention. MIT, Cambridge.
go back to reference Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Q J Exp Psychol, 41A, 19–45. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Q J Exp Psychol, 41A, 19–45.
go back to reference Pashler, H., Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mangun, G. R., O’Brien, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1994). Sequential operation of disconnected cerebral hemispheres in split-brain patients. Neuroreport, 5, 2381–2384.PubMed Pashler, H., Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mangun, G. R., O’Brien, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1994). Sequential operation of disconnected cerebral hemispheres in split-brain patients. Neuroreport, 5, 2381–2384.PubMed
go back to reference Passingham, R. E. (1993). The Frontal Lobes and Voluntary Action. Oxford UP, Oxford. Passingham, R. E. (1993). The Frontal Lobes and Voluntary Action. Oxford UP, Oxford.
go back to reference Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (2001). Imaging the pre-motor areas. Curr Opinion Neurobiol, 11, 663–672.CrossRef Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (2001). Imaging the pre-motor areas. Curr Opinion Neurobiol, 11, 663–672.CrossRef
go back to reference Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 18, 849–860.CrossRef Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 18, 849–860.CrossRef
go back to reference Rowe, J. B., Toni, I., Josephs, O., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E. (2000). The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science, 288, 1656–1660.CrossRefPubMed Rowe, J. B., Toni, I., Josephs, O., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E. (2000). The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science, 288, 1656–1660.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rushworth, M. F., Nixon, P. D., Renowden, S., Wade, D. T., & Passingham, R. E. (1997). The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1261–1273.CrossRefPubMed Rushworth, M. F., Nixon, P. D., Renowden, S., Wade, D. T., & Passingham, R. E. (1997). The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1261–1273.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rushworth, M. F., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2001a). Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 21, 5262–5271. Rushworth, M. F., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2001a). Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 21, 5262–5271.
go back to reference Rushworth, M. F. S., Krams, M., & Passingham, R. E. (2001b). The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cognit Neurosci, 13, 698–710.CrossRef Rushworth, M. F. S., Krams, M., & Passingham, R. E. (2001b). The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cognit Neurosci, 13, 698–710.CrossRef
go back to reference Rushworth, M. F. S., Hadland, K. A., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2002). Role of the Human Medial Frontal Cortex in Task Switching: A Combined fMRI and TMS Study. J Neurophysiol, 87, 2577–2592.PubMed Rushworth, M. F. S., Hadland, K. A., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2002). Role of the Human Medial Frontal Cortex in Task Switching: A Combined fMRI and TMS Study. J Neurophysiol, 87, 2577–2592.PubMed
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., Miller, J., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 21, 552–570.CrossRef Ruthruff, E., Miller, J., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 21, 552–570.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing Oxford U Press, New York, pp. 100–123. Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing Oxford U Press, New York, pp. 100–123.
go back to reference Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cognit Brain Res, 17, 733–746.CrossRef Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cognit Brain Res, 17, 733–746.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., & D’Esposito, M. (2002). Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Hum Brain Mapping, 17, 193–201.]CrossRef Schumacher, E. H., & D’Esposito, M. (2002). Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Hum Brain Mapping, 17, 193–201.]CrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P.A., & D’Esposito, M. (2002). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1111–1121.CrossRef Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P.A., & D’Esposito, M. (2002). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1111–1121.CrossRef
go back to reference Shapiro, K., Hillstrom, A. P., & Husain, M. (2002). Control of Visuotemporal Attention by Inferior Parietal and Superior Temporal Cortex. Curr Biol, 12, 1320–1325.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro, K., Hillstrom, A. P., & Husain, M. (2002). Control of Visuotemporal Attention by Inferior Parietal and Superior Temporal Cortex. Curr Biol, 12, 1320–1325.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Muller, K., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of Executive Functions in Dual-Task Performance with fMRI. J Cognit Neurosci, 14, 1184–1199.CrossRef Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Muller, K., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of Executive Functions in Dual-Task Performance with fMRI. J Cognit Neurosci, 14, 1184–1199.CrossRef
go back to reference Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, New York. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, New York.
go back to reference Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 15855–15860.CrossRefPubMed Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 15855–15860.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept and Perform, 29, 3–18. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept and Perform, 29, 3–18.
go back to reference Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cognit Psychol, 33, 266–307.CrossRefPubMed Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cognit Psychol, 33, 266–307.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welford A. T. (1980). The single channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction Time Academic Press, New York, pp. 215–252. Welford A. T. (1980). The single channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction Time Academic Press, New York, pp. 215–252.
go back to reference Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and theory. Br J Psychol, 43, 2–19. Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and theory. Br J Psychol, 43, 2–19.
go back to reference Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (2000). Arbitraty associations between antecedents and actions. Trends Neurosci, 23, 271–276.CrossRefPubMed Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (2000). Arbitraty associations between antecedents and actions. Trends Neurosci, 23, 271–276.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex
Auteurs
R. Marois
J. M. Larson
M. M. Chun
D. Shima
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2006
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0022-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2006

Psychological Research 6/2006 Naar de uitgave