Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2023

22-02-2022 | Original Article

Psychometric Properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale: Rasch Analysis

Auteur: Pei-Chen Wu

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 5/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) is one of commonly used measures for assessing individuals’ perfectionism. The main purpose of this current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) within the framework of the Rasch model. The sample consisted of 502 adolescents (53% males and 47% females). This study revealed were several important findings. First, adolescents interpreted the categories of the rating scales of the BTPS as intended and items demonstrated good targeting with the operating ranges from − 4.79 to 4.47 logits for rigid perfectionism, from − 3.84 to 3.76 logits for self-critical perfectionism and from − 4.04 to 3.92 logits for narcissistic perfectionism. Second, rigid perfectionism, self-critical perfectionism and narcissistic perfectionism exhibited unidimensionally, providing justification for the use of summed scores for each scale. Third, the average item difficulty of facets was different within each scale, with the facets of self-worth contingencies, socially prescribed perfectionism and other-oriented perfectionism being more difficult to endorse in their belonging scale. Fourth, there were no DIF items across sex, suggesting that items in three scales functioned equally across boys and girls. Fifth, rigid perfectionism (r = 0.15) and self-critical perfectionism (r = 0.55) were positively associated with neuroticism, but self-critical perfectionism (r = − 0.24) and narcissistic perfectionism (r = − 0.29) were negatively related with agreeableness. Finally, sex moderated the associations between rigid perfectionism and neuroticism. In sum, the findings in this study enhance psychometric properties of the BTPS.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
The original BTPS is an English version and thus it needs to be translated into a Chinese version for the use in Taiwan. First, the BTPS was translated into Chinese by two experts who were familiar with English and Chinese. When the Chinese version of the BTPS was developed based on comments from these two experts, the third expert who had no prior knowledge of the original scale conducted back translation. Finally, three Chinese adolescents reviewed the translated version to examine whether the items were understood properly.
 
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Oliver JM, Macdonald S (2002) Perfectionism in children and their parents: A developmental analysis. In G. L. Flett and P. L. Hewitt (Eds.), Perfectionism (pp. 89–132). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10458-004 Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Oliver JM, Macdonald S (2002) Perfectionism in children and their parents: A developmental analysis. In G. L. Flett and P. L. Hewitt (Eds.), Perfectionism (pp. 89–132). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​10458-004
4.
go back to reference Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Boucher DJ, Davidson LA, Munro Y (2000) The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale: development, validation, and association with adjustment. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Boucher DJ, Davidson LA, Munro Y (2000) The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale: development, validation, and association with adjustment. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
9.
go back to reference Rasch G (1960) Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Nielsen & Lydiche. Rasch G (1960) Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Nielsen & Lydiche.
10.
go back to reference Bond TG, Fox CM (2015) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd edn. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New YorkCrossRef Bond TG, Fox CM (2015) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd edn. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New YorkCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Wilson M (2005) Constructing measures: an item response modeling approach. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ Wilson M (2005) Constructing measures: an item response modeling approach. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
13.
go back to reference Wright BD, Linacre JM (1989) Observations are always ordinal: measures, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:857–860PubMed Wright BD, Linacre JM (1989) Observations are always ordinal: measures, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:857–860PubMed
14.
go back to reference Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis. MESA Press, Chicago Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis. MESA Press, Chicago
20.
go back to reference Linacre JM (2020) Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com Linacre JM (2020) Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com
21.
go back to reference Chen WH, Lenderking W, Jin Y, Wyrwich W, Gelhorn H, Revicki DA (2014) Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Qual Life Res 23(2):485–493CrossRefPubMed Chen WH, Lenderking W, Jin Y, Wyrwich W, Gelhorn H, Revicki DA (2014) Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Qual Life Res 23(2):485–493CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hagell P, Westergren A (2016) Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the Rasch model according to the Rasch Unidimensional measurement model (RUMM) program in health outcome measurement. J Appl Meas 17(4):416–431PubMed Hagell P, Westergren A (2016) Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the Rasch model according to the Rasch Unidimensional measurement model (RUMM) program in health outcome measurement. J Appl Meas 17(4):416–431PubMed
23.
go back to reference Linacre JM (2002) Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas 3:85–106PubMed Linacre JM (2002) Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas 3:85–106PubMed
24.
go back to reference Smith EV (2002) Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 3:205–231PubMed Smith EV (2002) Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 3:205–231PubMed
26.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric Properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale: Rasch Analysis
Auteur
Pei-Chen Wu
Publicatiedatum
22-02-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01331-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2023

Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2023 Naar de uitgave