Skip to main content
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
ZOEKEN
MENU 1 2 3 4
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2019

01-10-2018

Psychometric properties of a modified version of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) in a clinical sample of children with aggressive behavior

Auteurs: Teresa Kernder, Manfred Doepfner, Christina Dose, Anja Goertz-Dorten

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the psychometric properties of a German modification of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale—Parent Report for children with aggressive and oppositional behavior problems (WFIRS-P for ODD/CD).

Methods

Data were collected from a clinical sample of children (6–12 years; 96% boys) with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD) (N = 219). The WFIRS-P conceptual framework was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability was estimated using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and omega statistics. Validity was assessed through correlations between WFIRS-P for ODD/CD domain scores and parent-rated scales on symptoms of ODD, CD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a broad range of other behavioral and emotional problems, and scales on health-related quality of life and family burden.

Results

CFA of the WFIRS-P for ODD/CD revealed that a bifactor model, with a general factor accounting for common variance (ωH = 0.23–0.48) and independent specific group factors accounting for additional variance in item scores (ωS = 0.37–0.60), best fits the data. Thus, CFA confirmed the theoretical assumption of a general construct of impairment (total scale) and additional specific impairments (subscales, e.g., family, social activities). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient exceeded 0.70 for all subscales. Omega statistics showed that both the general construct and specific factors accounted for item variance. As expected, correlations with symptoms scales for ODD/CD and ADHD were low to moderate.

Conclusions

The use of the parent-rated WFIRS for ODD/CD in identifying ODD- and CD-related impairment in children is psychometrically supported. The scale can be employed to assess functional impairment in children with aggressive behavior problems.
vorige artikel Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Subjective Vitality Scale: evidence from Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong
volgende artikel Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure
Literatuur
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing. CrossRef
2.
Canino, G., Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (1999). Assessing functional impairment and social adaptation for child mental health services research: A review of measures. Mental Health Services Research, 1, 93–108. CrossRef
3.
Palermo, T. M., Long, A. C., Lewandowski, A. S., Drotar, D., Quittner, A. L., & Walker, L. S. (2008). Evidence-based assessment of health-related quality of life and functional impairment in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 983–996. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Greene, R. W., Biederman, J., Zerwas, S., Monuteaux, M. C., Goring, J. C., & Faraone, S. V. (2002). Psychiatric comorbidity, family dysfunction, and social impairment in referred youth with oppositional defiant disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1214–1224. CrossRefPubMed
5.
Munkvold, L. H., Lundervold, A. J., & Manger, T. (2011). Oppositional defiant disorder: Gender differences in co-occurring symptoms of mental health problems in a general population of children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 577–587. CrossRefPubMed
6.
Schachar, R., & Wachsmuth, R. (1990). Hyperactivity and parental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 381–392. CrossRefPubMed
7.
Van Lier, P. A., & Koot, H. M. (2010). Developmental cascades of peer relations and symptoms of externalizing and internalizing problems from kindergarten to fourth-grade elementary school. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 569–582. CrossRefPubMed
8.
Gordon, M., Antshel, K., Faraone, S., Barkley, R., Lewandowski, L., Hudziak, J. J., … Cunningham, C. (2006). Symptoms versus impairment: The case for respecting DSM-IV’s Criterion D. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 465–475. CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kutash, K., Lynn, N., & Burns, B. (2008). Child and adolescent measures of functional status. In A. Rush, M. First, D. Blacker (Eds.), Handbook of psychiatric measures (pp. 343–371). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
10.
Rapee, R. M., Boegels, S. M., van der Sluis, C. M., Craske, M. G., & Ollendick, T. (2012). Annual research review: Conceptualizing functional impairment in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 454–468. CrossRefPubMed
11.
Pickles, A., Rowe, R., Simonoff, E., Foley, D., Rutter, M., & Silberg, J. (2001). Child psychiatric symptoms and psychosocial impairment: Relationship and prognostic significance. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 230–235. CrossRefPubMed
12.
Haack, L. M., & Gerdes, A. C. (2011). Functional impairment in Latino children with ADHD: Implications for culturally appropriate conceptualization and measurement. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 318. CrossRefPubMed
13.
Winters, N. C., Collett, B. R., & Myers, K. M. (2005). Ten-year review of rating scales, VII: Scales assessing functional impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 309–338. CrossRefPubMed
14.
Burke, J. D., Pardini, D. A., & Loeber, R. (2008). Reciprocal relationships between parenting behavior and disruptive psycho-pathology from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 679–692. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Sasser, T., Schoenfelder, E. N., & Stein, M. A. (2017). Targeting functional impairments in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD. CNS Drugs, 31, 97–107. CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
18.
19.
Goertz-Dorten, A., Benesch, C., Berk-Pawlitzek, E., Faber, M., Hautmann, C., Hellmich, M., … Doepfner, M. (2017). Efficacy of an individualized social competence training for children with oppositional defiant disorders/conduct disorders—A randomized controlled trial with an active control group. Psychotherapy Research, 27(3), 326–337. CrossRef
20.
21.
Goertz-Dorten, A., Katzmann, J., Groth, M., Detering, K., Hellmann, A., Lutz, L., … Doepfner, M. Efficacy of an individualized computer-based social competence training for children with Oppositional Defiant Disorders/Conduct Disorders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. CrossRefPubMed
23.
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization.
24.
Doepfner, M., Goertz-Dorten, A., & Lehmkuhl, G. (2008). Diagnostik-System für psychische Stoerungen nach ICD-10 und DMS-IV für Kinder und Jugendliche—II. [Diagnostic system for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence—II]. Berne: Huber.
25.
Gajria, K., Kosinski, M., Sikirica, V., Huss, M., Livote, E., Reilly, K., … Erder, M. H. (2015). Psychometric validation of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report Form in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 1–11. CrossRef
26.
Qian, Y., Du, Q.-X., Qu, S., & Wang, Y. F. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Weiss Functional Impairment Scale-Parent Form for school age children. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25, 767–771.
27.
Tarakçıoğlu, M. C., Memik, N., Olgun, N. N., Aydemir, O. E., & Weiss, M. D. (2015). Turkish validity and reliability study of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 7, 129–139. CrossRefPubMed
28.
Doepfner, M., Plueck, J., & Kinnen, C., für die Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist (2014). CBCL Handbuch-Schulalter. Manual zum Elternfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen, (CBCL 4-18), zum Lehrerfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen (TRF) und zum Fragebogen für Jugendliche (YSR). [Manual of the child behavior checklist (CBCL), the youth self-report and teacher’s report form]. Goettingen: Hogrefe.
29.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 399–407. CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). News from the KINDL-Questionnaire—A new version for adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 7, 653. CrossRef
31.
Bullinger, M., Bruett, A. L., Erhart, M., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & BELLA Study Group (2008). Psychometric properties of the KINDL-R questionnaire: Results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 125–132. CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Morfeld, M., Stein, R., Reissmann, C., Bullinger, M., & Thyen, U. (2001). Der Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen (FaBel-Fragebogen)—Testung und Validierung der deutschen Version der Impact on Family Scale bei Familien mit behinderten Kindern. [German Validation of the Impact on Family Scale for children with disabilities]. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 51, 384–393. CrossRefPubMed
33.
Stein, R., & Jessop, D. (2003). The Impact on Family Scale revisited: Further psychometric data. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 24, 9–16. CrossRefPubMed
34.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
35.
Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
36.
Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1033–1068. CrossRef
37.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Mueller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
38.
Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846. CrossRefPubMed
39.
Yung, Y. F., Thissen, D., & McLeod, L. D. (1999). On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model. Psychometrika, 64, 113–128. CrossRef
40.
Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225. CrossRefPubMed
41.
Varni, J. W., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2006). The PedsQL as a patient-reported outcome in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A population-based study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 26. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric properties of a modified version of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) in a clinical sample of children with aggressive behavior
Auteurs
Teresa Kernder
Manfred Doepfner
Christina Dose
Anja Goertz-Dorten
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2015-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

Quality of Life Research 1/2019 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Mapping the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory to the Health Utility Index Mark III

OriginalPaper

Validation of two PROMIS item banks for measuring social participation in the Dutch general population

OriginalPaper

The prognostic value of health-related quality of life in patients with Chagas heart disease

OriginalPaper

Psychometric performance assessment of Malay and Malaysian English version of EQ-5D-5L in the Malaysian population

OriginalPaper

The impact of education on knowledge, adherence and quality of life among patients on haemodialysis

OriginalPaper

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire among patients following open heart surgery for valve dysfunction

Version: 0.2011.0