Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This study translates the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) into Chinese and examines its factor structure and measurement invariance in a sample of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong.
Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong were invited to participate in the study. Four models of the SVS (a 7-item model, two 6-item models and a 5-item model) were compared using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, and the criterion validity was assessed using bivariate correlations between subjective vitality and positive and negative affect. Finally, measurement invariance across genders and time points was examined to evaluate the invariance of the SVS model.
The results of the CFA analysis indicated that the 5-item measurement model fit the data better than the other three models. The Cronbach’s alpha was above 0.70 (0.92), revealing excellent internal consistency reliability, and the SVS was significantly associated with positive affect and negatively associated with negative affect, indicating criterion validity. Finally, the measurement invariance analysis of the 5-item model displayed strict invariance across genders and time points.
The results support the 5-item measurement model of the Chinese version of the SVS. This model has excellent internal consistency reliability, supports the criterion validity of the instrument and demonstrates strict invariance across genders and time points. In summary, the findings suggest that the 5-item Chinese version of the SVS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the subjective vitality of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Hays, R. D., & Morales, L. S. (2001). The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 350–357. CrossRef
Hirsch, J. K., Molnar, D., Chang, E. C., & Sirois, F. M. (2015). Future orientation and health quality of life in primary care: Vitality as a mediator. Quality of Life Research, 24, 1653–1659. CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In S. Fiske (Ed.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 141–166). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. CrossRef
Avlund, K. (2010). Fatigue in older adults: An early indicator of the aging process? Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 22(2), 100–115. CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565. CrossRef
Bjorner, J. B., Wallenstein, G. V., Martin, M. C., Lin, P., Blaisdell-Gross, B., Tak, P. C., & Mody, S. H. (2007). Interpreting score differences in the SF-36 Vitality scale: Using clinical conditions and functional outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Current Medical Research & Opinion, 23, 731–739. CrossRef
Buchwald, D., Pearlman, T., Umali, J., Schmaling, K., & Katon, W. (1996). Functional status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, other fatiguing illnesses, and healthy individuals. American Journal of Medicine, 101, 364–370. CrossRef
Maynard, S., Keijzers, G., Hansen, A. M., et al. (2015). Associations of subjective vitality with DNA damage, cardiovascular risk factors and physical performance. Acta Physiology (Oxf), 213(1), 156–170. CrossRef
Kawabata, M., Yamazaki, F., Guo, D. W., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2017). Advancement of the Subjective Vitality Scale: Examination of alternative measurement models for Japanese and Singaporeans. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27(12), 1793–1800. CrossRef
Castillo, I., Tomás, I., & Balaguer, I. (2017). The Spanish-version of the Subjective Vitality Scale: Psychometric properties and evidence of validity. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, 1–8. CrossRef
Couto, N., Antunes, R., Monteiro, D., Moutão, J., Marinho, D., & Cid, L. (2017). Validation of the Subjective Vitality Scale and study of the vitality of elderly people according to their physical activity. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 19(3), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n3p261. CrossRef
Akin, U., Akin, A., & Ug˘ur (2016). Mediating role of mindfulness on the associations of friendship quality and subjective vitality. Psychological Report, 119(2), 516–526. CrossRef
Bostic, T. J., Rubio, D. M., & Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the Subjective Vitality Scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52, 313–324. CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagne, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 159–169. CrossRef
Cordeiro, P., et al. (2016). The Portuguese validation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Concurrent and longitudinal relations to well-being and ill-being. Psychologica Belgica, 56(3), 193–209. CrossRef
Liu, J. D., & Chung, P. K. (2014). Development and initial validation of the psychological needs satisfaction scale in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 18(2), 101–122. CrossRef
Liu, J. D., Bartholomew, K., & Chung, P. K. (2017). Perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal styles and well-being and ill-being in secondary school physical education students: The role of need satisfaction and need frustration. School Mental Health, 9, 360–371. CrossRef
Molina-García, J., Castillo, I., & Queralt, A. (2011). Leisure-time physical activity and psychological well-being in university students. Psychological Report, 109(2), 453–460. CrossRef
Taylor, I., & Lonsdale, C. (2010). Cultural differences in the relationships between autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, subjective vitality, and effort in British and Chinese physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 655–673. CrossRef
Park, S., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Ntoumanis, N., Stenling, A., Fenton, S. A. M., & Veldhuijzen, J. J. C. S., & van Zanten. (2017). Profiles of physical function, physical activity, and sedentary behavior and their associations with mental health in residents of assisted living facilities. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 9(1), 60–80.
Rouse, P. C., Van Zanten, J.J., Ntoumanis, N., Metsios, G. S., Chen, Y., George, D., Kitas, G. D., & Duda, J. L. (2015). Measuring the positive psychological well-being of people with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional validation of the subjective vitality scale. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 17, 312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0827-7. CrossRef
Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566. CrossRef
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 471–492. CrossRef
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. CrossRef
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-Cultural adaptation of health-related qualify of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432. CrossRef
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. CrossRef
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. CrossRef
Horn, J. L., & Mcardle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117–144. CrossRef
- Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Subjective Vitality Scale: evidence from Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong
- Springer International Publishing
Quality of Life Research
An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649