Top

Gepubliceerd in:

19-12-2016

Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS)

Auteurs: Sarit A. Golub, Kristi E. Gamarel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 3/2017

Abstract

The Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS) was developed to measure four distinct categories of barriers and motives to condom use, including: risk reduction motivations, pleasure reduction barriers, intimacy interference barriers, and partner pressure barriers. The CBMS is a 16-item scale with four items that correspond to each of these subscales. The CBMS was tested in two samples of gay and bisexual men. Results support the reliability and validity of the scale and its structure. Results also indicate that CBMS subscales are distinct from general measures of sexual wellbeing, personality factors, or relationship quality (i.e., discriminant validity) and are associated with self-reported condom use with different partner types (i.e., construct validity). The CBMS can be helpful in better understanding the dynamics of condom use in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis decision-making, and can shed light on innovative approaches to enhance condom use as part of comprehensive HIV prevention and sexual health goals.

vorige artikel Self-determination theory and weight loss in a Diabetes Prevention Program translation trial

volgende artikel Engagement in health-promoting behaviors and patient–caregiver interdependence in dyads facing advanced cancer: an exploratory study

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 170–211.CrossRef

Alaei, K., Paynter, C. A., Juan, S. C., & Alaei, A. (2016). Using pre-exposure prophylaxis, losing condoms? Preexposure prophylaxis promotion may undermine safe sex. AIDS, 30(18), 2753–2756.PubMedCrossRef

Bauermeister, J. A., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Ventuneac, A., & Dolezal, C. (2009). Assessing motivations to engage in intentional condomless anal intercourse in HIV-risk contexts (“bareback sex”) among men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 156.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Berg, R. C. (2009). Barebacking: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 754–764.PubMedCrossRef

Birrell, P. J., Owen, N. G., Delpech, V. C., et al. (2013). HIV incidence in men who have sex with men in England and Wales 2001-10: A nationwide population study. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13, 313–318.PubMedCrossRef

Blechner, M. J. (2002). Intimacy, pleasure, risk, and safety: Discussion of Cheuvront’s high-risk sexual behavior in the treatment of HIV-negative patients. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 6, 27–33.CrossRef

Brown, I. S. (1984). Development of a scale to measure attitude toward the condom as a method of birth control. Journal of Sex Research, 120, 255–263.CrossRef

Burlew, A., Wilson, J., Montgomery, L., Peteet, B., Johnson, C., & Hatch-Maillette, M. (2015). Do masculinity and perceived condom barriers predict heterosexual HIV risk behaviors among black substance abusing men? Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 7, 4.

Campbell, A. N., Brooks, A. J., Pavlicova, M., Hu, M. C., Hatch-Maillette, M. A., Calsyn, D. A., et al. (2016). Barriers to condom use: Results for men and women enrolled in HIV risk reduction trials in outpatient drug treatment. Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services, 15, 130–146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRef

Catania, J. A., Kegeles, S. M., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Towards an understanding of risk behavior: An AIDS risk reduction model (ARRM). Health Education Quarterly, 17, 53–72.PubMedCrossRef

CDC. (2014). Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2014 clinical practice guideline. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease and Control.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2015). HIV Surveillance Report, 2013 (Vol. 25). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.

Champion, V. L. (1984). Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Advances in Nursing Science, 6(3), 73–87.PubMedCrossRef

Crosby, R., Graham, C. A., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R., & Mena, L. (2016). Measures of attitudes toward communication about condom use: Their relationships with sexual risk behavior among young black men who have sex with men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 43, 94–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Crosby, R., Milhausen, R., Yarver, W. L., Sanders, S. A., & Graham, C. A. (2008). Condom “turn offs” among adults: An exploratory study. International Journal of STD andAIDS, 19, 590–594.CrossRef

Crosby, R., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., & Graham, C. A. (2005). Condom discomfort and associated problems with their use among university students. Journal of American College Health, 54, 143–147.PubMedCrossRef

DuBois, L. Z., Macapagal, K. R., Rivera, Z., Prescott, T. L., Ybarra, M. L., & Mustankis, B. (2015). To have sex or not to have sex? An online focus group study of sexual decision making among experienced and inexperienced gay and bisexual adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2027–2040.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Eaton, L. A., Driffin, D. D., Bauermeister, J., Smith, H., & Conway-Washington, C. (2015). Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among risk, HIV-negative, Black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 29, 423–429.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychology Bulletin, 111, 455–474.CrossRef

Gakumo, C. A., Moneyham, L. D., Enah, C. C., & Childs, G. D. (2012). The moderating effect of sexual pressure on young urban women’s condom use. Research in Nursing and Health, 35, 4–14.PubMedCrossRef

Gamarel, K. E., & Golub, S. A. (2015). Intimacy motivations and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption intentions among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in romantic relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 177–186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Darbes, L. A., Hoff, C. C., Chakravarty, D., Nemoto, T., et al. (2016). Dyadic dynamics of HIV risk among transgender women and their primary male sexual partners: the role of sexual agreement types and motivations. AIDS Care, 28, 104–111.PubMedCrossRef

Goedel, W. C., Halkitis, P. N., Greene, R. E., & Duncan, D. T. (2016). Correlates of awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in New York City. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 1435–1442.PubMedCrossRef

Golub, S. A. (2014). Tensions between the epidemiology and psychology of HIV risk: Implications for pre-ex. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 1686–1693.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Golub, S. A., Starks, T. J., Payton, G., & Parsons, J. T. (2012). The critical role of intimacy in sexual risk behavior of gay and bisexual men. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 626–632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Grady, W. R., Klepinger, D. H., Billy, J. O., & Tanfer, K. (1993). Condom characteristics: The perceptions and preferences of men in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 67–73.PubMedCrossRef

Grant, R. M., Lama, J. R., Anderson, P. L., et al. (2010). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2587–2599.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Harawa, N. T., Williams, J. K., Ramamurthi, H. C., & Bingham, T. (2006). Perceptions towards condom use, sexual activity, and HIV disclosure among HIV-positive African American men who have sex with men: Implications for heterosexual transmission. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 682–694.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Hart, G. J., & Elford, J. (2010). Sexual risk behaviour of men who have sex with men: Emerging patterns and new challenges. Current Opinions in Infectious Diseases, 23, 39–44.CrossRef

Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Math and Statistical Psycholology, 57, 327–351.CrossRef

Helweg-Larsen, M., & Colliins, B. E. (1994). The UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale: Documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 224–237.CrossRef

Hensel, D. J., Stupiansky, N. W., Herbenick, D., & Dodge, B. (2012). Sexual pleasure during condom-protected vaginal sex among heterosexual men. Journal of Sex Medicine, 9, 1272–1276.CrossRef

Higgins, J. A., Tanner, A. E., & Janssen, E. (2009). Arousal loss related to safer sex and risk of pregnancy: Implications for women’s and men’s sexual health. Perspectives in Sex and Reproductive Health, 41, 150–157.CrossRef

Higgins, J. A., & Wang, Y. (2015). The role of young adults’ pleasure attitudes in shaping condom use. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1329–1332.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Hill, B. J., Amick, E. E., & Sanders, S. A. (2011). Condoms and US college-aged men and women: Briefly assessing attitudes toward condoms and gender condom use behaviours. Sexual Health, 8, 372–377.PubMedCrossRef

Hoff, C. C., Campbell, C. K., Chakravarty, D., & Darbes, L. A. (2016). Relationship-based predictors of sexual risk for HIV among MSM couples: A systematic review of the literature. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2873–2892.PubMedCrossRef

Jones, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Pressure Scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 281–293.PubMedCrossRef

Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factr analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 648–718.CrossRef

Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (2001). The Sexual Compulsivity Scale: Further development and use with HIV-positive persons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 379–395.PubMedCrossRef

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.PubMedCrossRef

Liu, A. Y., Cohen, S. E., Vittinghoff, E., et al. (2015). Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection integrated with municipal- and community-based sexual health services. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 176, 75–84.

MacKellar, D. A., Valleroy, L. A., Secura, G. M., Behel, S., Bingham, T., Celentano, D. D., et al. (2007). Perceptions of lifetime risk and actual risk for acquiring HIV among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 263–270.PubMedCrossRef

Madu, S. N., & Peltzer, K. (2003). Factor structure of condom attitudes among Black South African university students. Journal of Social and Behavioral Perspectives, 31, 265–274.CrossRef

Mayer, K. H., & Krakower, D. S. (2015). If PrEP decreases HIV transmission, what is impeding its uptake? Clinical Infectious Disease. http://www.natap.org/2015/HIV/ClinInfectDis2015-Mayer-cid_civ665.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.

Mimiaga, M. J., Goldhammer, H., Belanoff, C., Tetu, A. M., & Mayer, K. H. (2007). Men who have sex with men: Perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34, 113–119.PubMedCrossRef

Morgan, E., Johnson, I., & Sigler, R. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s participation in unwanted sexual intercourse. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 515–522.CrossRef

Operario, D., Nemoto, T., Iwamoto, M., & Moore, T. (2011). Unprotected sexual behavior and HIV risk in the context of primary partnerships for transgender women. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 674–682.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Parsons, J. T., & Bimbi, D. S. (2007). Intentional unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men: Barebacking—From behavior to identity. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 277–287.PubMedCrossRef

Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Bimbi, D. S., & Borkowski, T. (2000). Perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with condom use and unprotected sex among late adolescent college students. Journal of Adolescences, 23, 377–391.CrossRef

Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Wolitski, R., & Gomez, C. (2003). Correlates of sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevevention, 15, 383–400.CrossRef

Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88.PubMed

Phillips, A. N., Cambiano, V., Nakagawa, F., et al. (2013). Increased HIV incidence in men who have sex with men despite high levels of ART-induced viral suppression: Analysis of an extensively documented epidemic. PLoS ONE, 8, e55312.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Pollack, J. A., & Halkitis, P. N. (2009). Environmental factors in relation to unprotected sexual behavior among gay, bisexual and other MSM. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 340–355.CrossRef

Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., Harlow, L. L., Rossi, J. S., & Velicer, W. F. (1994). The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: A review. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 471–486.PubMedCrossRef

Randolph, M. E., Pinkerton, S. D., Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., & Abramson, P. R. (2007). Sexual pleasure and condom use. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 844–848.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Hollub, A. V., et al. (2010). A psychometric assessment of the Multi-Factor Attitude Toward Condom Scale (MFACS). International Journal of STD and AIDS, 22, 119–129.

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measure commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.CrossRef

Sacco, W. P., Levine, B., Reed, D. L., & Thompason, K. (1991). Attitudes about condom use as an AIDS-relevant behavior: Their factor structure and relation to condom use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 265–272.CrossRef

Schumacker, E. S., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). Structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Scott, H. M., & Klausner, J. D. (2016). Sexually transmitted infections and pre-exposure prophylaxis: Challenges and opportunities among men who have sex with men in the US. AIDS Research and Therapy, 13. doi:10.1186/s12981-016-0089-8.

Scott-Sheldon, L. A., & Johnson, B. T. (2006). Eroticizing creates safer sex: A research synthesis. Journal of Primary Prevevention, 27, 619–640.CrossRef

Snell, W. E., Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (1993). The multidimensional sexuality questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 27–55.CrossRef

Starks, T. J., Payton, G., Golub, S. A., Weinberger, C. L., & Parsons, J. T. (2014). Contexualizing condom use: Intimacy interference, stigma, and unprotected sex. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 711–720.PubMedCrossRef

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Theodore, P. S., Durán, R., Antoni, M. H., Fernandez, M. I., & Schneiderman, N. (2004). Intimacy and sexual behavior among HIV-positive men-who-have-sex-with-men in primary relationships. AIDS and Behavior, 8, 321–331.PubMedCrossRef

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.CrossRef

Yu, C. Y., & Muthen, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical Report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.

Titel: Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS)
Auteurs: Sarit A. Golub
Kristi E. Gamarel
Publicatiedatum: 19-12-2016
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9815-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Relations between adaptive and maladaptive pain cognitions and within-day pain exacerbations in individuals with fibromyalgia

A group-mediated physical activity intervention in older knee osteoarthritis patients: effects on social cognitive outcomes

Investigating the role of implicit prototypes in the prototype willingness model

Examining acute bi-directional relationships between affect, physical feeling states, and physical activity in free-living situations using electronic ecological momentary assessment

Self-determination theory and weight loss in a Diabetes Prevention Program translation trial

Past racial discrimination exacerbates the effects of racial exclusion on negative affect, perceived control, and alcohol-risk cognitions among Black young adults