Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-07-2011 | Original Article

Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation

Auteurs: Rajal G. Cohen, David A. Rosenbaum

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2011

Abstract

People pick up objects in ways that reflect prospective as well as retrospective control. Prospective control is indicated by planning for end-state comfort such that people grasp a cylinder to be rotated or translated with a hand orientation or at a height that affords a comfortable final posture. Retrospective control is indicated when people reuse a remembered grasp rather than using a new grasp that would ensure end-state comfort. Here, we asked whether these manifestations of prospective and retrospective control co-occur. We did so by having healthy young-adult participants grasp a cylinder to rotate and translate it between a horizontal position and a vertical position at each of five heights. We found that participants planned for comfortable final hand orientations for first moves but relied on recall for subsequent hand orientations. The results suggest that motor planning is sensitive to computational as well as physical demands and that object rotation and translation are not dissociable features of motor control, at least as reflected in their contributions to grasp selection. The latter result is consistent with the hypothesis that movements constitute holistic body changes between successive goal postures.

vorige artikel Action–effect learning in early childhood: does language matter?

Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 36–41.PubMed

Ansuini, C., Giosa, I., Tutella, L., Alloé, G. M., & Castiello, U. (2008). An object for an action, the same object for other actions: Effects on hand shaping. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 111–119.CrossRef

Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture. Psychological Review, 114, 1015–1046.PubMedCrossRef

Chapman, K. M., Weiss, D. J., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Evolutionary roots of motor planning: The end-state comfort effect in lemurs (Lemur catta, Eulemur mongoz, Eulemur coronatus, Eulemur collaris, Hapalemur griseus, and Varecia rubra). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124, 229–232

Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486–495.CrossRef

Fischman, M. G., Stodden, D. F., & Lehman, D. M. (2003). The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 17–24.PubMed

Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99, 201–215.CrossRef

Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 867–878.CrossRef

Heuer, H. (2003). Motor control. In A. Healy & R. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology) (pp. 317–354). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Hughes, C. (1996). Planning problems in autism at the level of motor control. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 99–107.PubMedCrossRef

Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235–254.PubMed

Lam, M., McFee, K., Chua, R., & Weeks, D. J. (2006). Macroscopic aspects of gross motor control: A test of the end-state comfort effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 396–400.PubMed

Lewin, K. (1922a). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. I [The problem of measuring will and the basic law of association I]. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 191–302.CrossRef

Lewin, K. (1922b). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. II [The problem of measuring will and the basic law of association II]. Psychologische Forschung, 2, 65–140.CrossRef

Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007). Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9354–9368.PubMedCrossRef

Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef

Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 4, 365–378.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A. (2005). The Cinderella of psychology: The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist, 60, 308–317.PubMedCrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Human Motor Control (2nd ed. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.

Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Vaughan, J. (2006). Plans for grasping objects. In M. L. Latash & F. Lestienne (Eds.), Progress in motor control (pp. 9–25). New York: Springer-Verlag

Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E. S., & Cohen, R. G. (2006b). Precision requirements affect grasp choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 918–922.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. M., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28–67.PubMedCrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen, M. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 321–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709–734.PubMedCrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., van Heugten, C., & Caldwell, G. C. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94, 59–85.PubMedCrossRef

Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058–1073.PubMedCrossRef

Rossetti, Y., Meckler, C., & Prablanc, C. (1994). Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 131–136.CrossRef

Shadmehr, R., & Krakauer, J. W. (2007). A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 359–381.CrossRef

Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.PubMedCrossRef

Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96, 133–147.PubMedCrossRef

Steenbergen, B., Hulstijn, W., & Dortmans, S. (2000). Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy—Minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 385–397.CrossRef

Stelmach, G. E., Castiello, U., & Jeannerod, M. (1994). Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 178–186.PubMedCrossRef

Thibaut, J.-P., & Toussaint, L. (2010). Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 116–129.PubMedCrossRef

van Swieten, L.M., van Bergen, E., Williams, J.H.G., Wilson, A.D., Plumb, M.S., Kent, S.W., & Mon-Williams, M.A. (2010). A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 493–499.PubMedCrossRef

Weigelt, M., Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Returning home: Locations rather than movements are recalled in human object manipulation. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 191–198.CrossRef

Weigelt, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., Hülshorst, S., & Schack, T. (2009). Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 132, 68–79.PubMedCrossRef

Weiss, D. J., & Wark, J. (2009). Hysteresis effects in a motor task in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 427–433.PubMedCrossRef

Weiss, D. J., Wark, J. D., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychological Science, 18, 1063–1068.PubMedCrossRef

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9, 1–27.CrossRef

Titel: Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation
Auteurs: Rajal G. Cohen
David A. Rosenbaum
Publicatiedatum: 01-07-2011
Uitgeverij: Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0311-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2011

Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes

Integrating visual mental images and visual percepts: new evidence for depictive representations

Action–effect learning in early childhood: does language matter?

Race and gender of faces can be ignored

Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order sequential probabilities

Two-digit number processing: holistic, decomposed or hybrid? A computational modelling approach