Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal 10/2008

01-10-2008 | editorial

Primary PCI: false positives versus false negatives

Auteur: W. J. van der Giessen

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 10/2008

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed within 12 hours after onset of symptoms in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the currently recommended therapy in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.1 The basis of these recommendations is an array of clinical trials comparing PCI with thrombolysis on short-term as well as long-term follow-up.2 Initially and intuitively larger STEMIs in younger patients were eligible for this therapy, but increasingly also smaller infarcts and older patients have proven to benefit from primary PCI.3 Typically, in centres providing the service of primary PCI in the Netherlands, about a third of the total number of PCIs is now for STEMI.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J 2005;26:804-47. The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J 2005;26:804-47.
2.
go back to reference Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet 2003;361: 13-20. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet 2003;361: 13-20.
3.
go back to reference de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van 't Hof, et al. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1729-32. de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van 't Hof, et al. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1729-32.
4.
go back to reference Gu YL, Svilaas T, van der Horst ICC, Zijlstra F. Conditions mimicking acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Neth Heart J 2008;16:325-31. Gu YL, Svilaas T, van der Horst ICC, Zijlstra F. Conditions mimicking acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Neth Heart J 2008;16:325-31.
5.
go back to reference Lanson DM, Menssen KM, Sharkey SW, et al. ‘False positive’ cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007; 298:2754-60. Lanson DM, Menssen KM, Sharkey SW, et al. ‘False positive’ cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007; 298:2754-60.
Metagegevens
Titel
Primary PCI: false positives versus false negatives
Auteur
W. J. van der Giessen
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2008
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 10/2008
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086172

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2008

Netherlands Heart Journal 10/2008 Naar de uitgave