Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Peer tutor-led small group sessions are a valuable learning strategy but students may lack confidence in the absence of a content expert. This study examined whether faculty reinforcement of peer tutor-led small group content was beneficial.
Two peer tutor-led small group sessions were compared with one faculty-led small group session using questionnaires sent to student participants and interviews with the peer tutors. One peer tutor-led session was followed by a lecture with revision of the small group content; after the second, students submitted a group report which was corrected and returned to them with comments.
Student participants and peer tutors identified increased discussion and opportunity for personal reflection as major benefits of the peer tutor-led small group sessions, but students did express uncertainty about gaps in their learning following these sessions. Both methods of subsequent faculty reinforcement were perceived as valuable by student participants and peer tutors. Knowing in advance that the group report would be corrected reduced discussion in some groups, potentially negating one of the major benefits of the peer tutor-led sessions.
Faculty reinforcement of peer-tutor led small group content benefits students but close attention should be paid to the method of reinforcement.
Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:115–22. CrossRef
Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. Student teaching: Views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29:583–90. CrossRef
Dandavino M, Snell L, Wiseman J. Why medical students should learn how to teach. Med Teach. 2007;29:558–65. CrossRef
Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29:591–9. CrossRef
Wadoodi A, Crosby JR. Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited. Med Teach. 2002;24:241–4. CrossRef
Ross MT, Cameron HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2007;29:527–45. CrossRef
Yu T‑C, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken DP, Hill AG. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:157–72.
Solomon P, Crowe J. Perceptions of student peer tutors in a problem-based learning programme. Med Teach. 2001;23:181–6. CrossRef
Ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29:546–52. CrossRef
Blanchard DS. Peer teaching: an important skill for all medical students and doctors? Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:6–7. CrossRef
Fulford L, Gunn V, Davies G, Evans C, Raza T, Vassallo M. Near peer integrated teaching for final year medical students. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:129–32. CrossRef
Steele DJ, Medder JD, Turner P. A comparison of learning outcomes and attitudes in student- versus faculty-led problem-based learning: an experimental study. Med Educ. 2000;34:23–9. CrossRef
Kassab S, Abu-Hijleh MF, Al-Shboul Q, Hamdy H. Student-led tutorials in problem-based learning: educational outcomes and students’ perceptions. Med Teach. 2005;27:521–6. CrossRef
Heckmann JG, Dutsch M, Rauch C, Lang C, Weih M, Schwab S. Effects of peer-assisted training during the neurology clerkship: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15:1365–70. CrossRef
Peets AD, Coderre S, Wright B, Jenkins D, Burak K, Leskosky S, et al. Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized cross-over study. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:55–9. CrossRef
Knobe M, Munker R, Sellei RM, Holschen M, Mooij SC, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, et al. Peer teaching: a randomized controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ. 2010;44:148–55. CrossRef
Ince-Cushman D, Rudkin T, Rosenberg E. Supervised near-peer clinical teaching in the ambulatory clinic: an exploratory study of family medicine residents’ perspectives. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:8–13. CrossRef
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334. CrossRef
Kerfoot BP, DeWolf WC, Masser BA, Federman DD. Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2007;41:23:31.
Benjamin AS, Tullis J. What makes distributed practice effective? Cogn Psychol. 2010;61:228–47. CrossRef
- Peer-led small groups: Are we on the right track?
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum