Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Given widespread concern associated with school-based bullying, researchers have looked beyond a dyadic perspective (i.e., bullies and victims only), and now consider the broader social ecology of the peer group. In this research, we examined how the behaviors of peer bystanders influence subsequent reactions to bullies and their victims. Two hundred and six 10- to 15-year-old boys (Mage = 12.46) were invited to play a computer game with three other boys allegedly located at another school. Before the start of the game, participants “met the other players” apparently sitting in a waiting room. These child actors depicted an escalating bullying episode in which the behavior of the bystander was manipulated: aide to the bully, defender of the victim, or passive outsider. Immediately after exposure to the bullying, each participant played a ball toss game (Cyberball) with the three other boys in the video. Individual differences among participants were examined as moderators of the effect of bystander behavior on participants’ willingness to include the “victim” in the game. Results indicated that, when exposed to a passive bystander, boys’ normative beliefs about aggression, as well as their tendency to morally disengage from observed egregious acts, decreased their willingness to include the victim in the game.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A., Bararanelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. CrossRef
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Charach, A., Pepler, D., & Ziegler, S. (1995). Bullying at school - a Canadian perspective: a survey of problems and suggestions for intervention. Education Canada, 35, 12–18.
Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–867. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83. CrossRef
Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P. K., & Pereira, B. (2001). Measuring workplace bullying. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 7, 33–51. CrossRef
Crick, N. C., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. CrossRef
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Endersen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 147–165). Washington: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617–638.
Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527. CrossRef
Howard, A. M., & Landau, S. (2005). Psychopathy and bullying: Effect of aggressors’ characteristics on peer bystander devaluation of the victim. Poster presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282. CrossRef
Langdon, S., & Preble, W. (2008). The relationship between levels of perceived respect and bullying in 5th through 12th graders. Adolescence, 43, 485–503. PubMed
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulleting, 89, 308–324. CrossRef
Litvack-Miller, W., McDougall, D., & Romney, D. M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303–324. PubMed
Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291–310.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Education Research Journal, 37, 699–725. CrossRef
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65.
Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1997). Peer networks and bullying schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305–312. CrossRef
Staub, E., Fellner, D., Jr., Berry, J., & Morange, K. (2003). Passive and active bystandership across grades in response to students bullying other students. In E. Staub (Ed.), The psychology of good and evil. Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others (pp. 240–243). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Thornberg, R. (2007). A classmate in distress: schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 5–28. CrossRef
Thornberg, R. (2010). A student in distress: moral frames and bystander behavior in school. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 585–608. CrossRef
Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.
Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D. & William, K. D. (2012). When do we ostracize? Social Psychological and Personality Science. Online first version of record. Apr 12, 2012.
- Peer Bystanders to Bullying: Who Wants to Play with the Victim?
Anne M. Howard
John B. Pryor
- Springer US