Top

Gepubliceerd in:

30-07-2022

Partner effects on caregiver and care recipient depressed mood: heterogeneity across health condition and relationship type

Auteurs: Kristin Litzelman, Nadia Al Nassar

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 5/2022

Abstract

The well-being of caregivers and their care recipients is interrelated, although conflicting evidence has emerged across different caregiving populations. Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study and the National Study of Caregiving (2015 and 2017, n = 742 dyads), we constructed actor-partner interdependence models assessing how spillover (i.e., interdependence) of depressed mood varied by care recipient health condition (specifically cancer, dementia, stroke, and diabetes) and kinship type (spouse/partner, child, other relative, or non-relative). Across condition types, care recipient-to-caregiver partner effects were significantly larger in dyads with vs. without cancer and significantly smaller in dyads with vs. without diabetes (p_interactions < .05). Substantive differences in partner effects were observed by kinship type, although moderation was not statistically significant. The findings highlight potential heterogeneity in caregiver-care recipient interdependence with implications for future research and delivery of supportive care.

vorige artikel Identifying the risk of opioid misuse in a chronic pain population: the utility of the MMPI-2-RF personality psychopathology five (PSY-5-RF) and higher-order scales

volgende artikel Medical avoidance among marginalized groups: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Badr, H., Bakhshaie, J., & Chhabria, K. (2019). Dyadic interventions for cancer survivors and caregivers: State of the science and new directions. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 35, 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Badr, H., Federman, A. D., Wolf, M., Revenson, T. A., & Wisnivesky, J. P. (2017). Depression in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their informal caregivers. Aging & Mental Health, 21, 975–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1186153CrossRef

Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buck, H. G., Stromberg, A., Chung, M. L., Donovan, K. A., Harkness, K., Howard, A. M., & Evangelista, L. S. (2018). A systematic review of heart failure dyadic self-care interventions focusing on intervention components, contexts, and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 77, 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.007CrossRefPubMed

Dellmann-Jenkins, M., Blankemeyer, M., & Pinkard, O. (2001). Incorporating the elder caregiving role into the developmental tasks of young adulthood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2190/FGQA-65FU-JGNT-6C9JCrossRefPubMed

Hunt, G. G., Longacre, M. L., Kent, E. E., & Weber-Raley, L. (2016). Cancer Caregiving in the U.S.: An Intense, Episodic, and Challenging Care Experience. Retrieved from http://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CancerCaregivingReport_FINAL_June-17-2016.pdf

Ivziku, D., Clari, M., Piredda, M., De Marinis, M. G., & Matarese, M. (2019). Anxiety, depression and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis. Quality of Life Research, 28, 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2024-zCrossRefPubMed

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford press.

Kershaw, T., Ellis, K. R., Yoon, H., Schafenacker, A., Katapodi, M., & Northouse, L. (2015). The interdependence of advanced cancer patients’ and their family caregivers’ mental health, physical health, and self-efficacy over time. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9743-yCrossRefPubMed

Kim, Y., & Schulz, R. (2008). Family caregivers’ strains: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. Journal of Aging and Health, 20, 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264308317533CrossRefPubMed

Kim, Y., Van Ryn, M., Jensen, R. E., Griffin, J. M., Potosky, A., & Rowland, J. (2015). Effects of gender and depressive symptoms on quality of life among colorectal and lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psycho-Oncology, 24, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3580CrossRefPubMed

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2003). The patient health questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care, 41, 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3CCrossRefPubMed

Litzelman, K. (2019). Caregiver well-being and the quality of cancer care. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 35, 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Litzelman, K., & Yabroff, K. R. (2015). How are spousal depressed mood, distress, and quality of life associated with risk of depressed mood in cancer survivors? Longitudinal findings from a national sample. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 24, 969–977. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1420CrossRefPubMed

Lwi, S. J., Ford, B. Q., Casey, J. J., Miller, B. L., & Levenson, R. W. (2017). Poor caregiver mental health predicts mortality of patients with neurodegenerative disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 7319–7324. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701597114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McLean, S., Gomes, B., & Higginson, I. J. (2017). The intensity of caregiving is a more important predictor of adverse bereavement outcomes for adult–child than spousal caregivers of patients who die of cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 26, 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4132CrossRefPubMed

Meyers, E. E., Shaffer, K. M., Gates, M., Lin, A., Rosand, J., & Vranceanu, A.-M. (2020). Baseline resilience and posttraumatic symptoms in dyads of neurocritical patients and their informal caregivers: A prospective dyadic analysis. Psychosomatics, 61, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2019.11.007CrossRefPubMed

National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2016). Families caring for an aging America (0309448069). Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23606/families-caring-for-an-aging-america

National Alliance for Caregiving, & AARP Public Policy Institute. (2020). Caregiving in the US 2020. Retrieved from Washinton, DC: https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2015_CaregivingintheUS_Final-Report-June-4_WEB.pdf

National Alliance for Caregiving, & the Alzheimer’s Association. (2017). Dementia Caregiving in the US National Health and Aging Trends Study. Retrieved from Washington, D.C.: https://ogg.osu.edu/media/documents/sage/DementiaCaregivingFINAL_WEB.pdf

Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J., & Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process - an overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30, 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/30.5.583CrossRefPubMed

Pristavec, T. (2019). The caregiving dyad: Do caregivers’ appraisals of caregiving matter for care recipients’ health? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 82, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.01.020CrossRefPubMed

Pucciarelli, G., Lommi, M., Magwood, G. S., Simeone, S., Colaceci, S., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2021). Effectiveness of dyadic interventions to improve stroke patient–caregiver dyads’ outcomes after discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20, 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515120926069CrossRefPubMed

Segrin, C., Badger, T. A., Sikorskii, A., Pasvogel, A., Weihs, K., Lopez, A. M., & Chalasani, P. (2020). Longitudinal dyadic interdependence in psychological distress among Latinas with breast cancer and their caregivers. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28, 2735–2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05121-4CrossRefPubMed

Shaffer, K. M., Kim, Y., & Carver, C. S. (2016). Physical and mental health trajectories of cancer patients and caregivers across the year post-diagnosis: A dyadic investigation. Psychology & Health, 31, 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1131826CrossRef

Streck, B. P., Wardell, D. W., Derrick, J., & Wood, G. L. (2021). Physical and psychological health interdependence among dyads in hematological cancer. Cancer Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000943CrossRefPubMed

The Hormone Foundation, & The National Alliance for Caregiving. (2010). Diabetes Caregivers Needs Assessment Survey – Executive Summary. Retrieved from https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NAC_Diabetes-Caregivers-Needs-Assessment-Survey_Executive-Summary-3-25-10_Final.pdf

Thomson, P., Howie, K., Leslie, S. J., Angus, N. J., Andreis, F., Thomson, R., & Chung, M. L. (2020). Evaluating emotional distress and health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure and their family caregivers: Testing dyadic dynamics using the actor-partner interdependence model. PLoS One, 15, e0227129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Partner effects on caregiver and care recipient depressed mood: heterogeneity across health condition and relationship type
Auteurs: Kristin Litzelman
Nadia Al Nassar
Publicatiedatum: 30-07-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00343-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2022

Worry as a mechanism of the relationship between perceived new knowledge and discouragement to smoke elicited from graphic cigarette warnings

Medical avoidance among marginalized groups: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

A spotlight on avoidance coping to manage fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors in an eHealth intervention

Impacts of two behavior change interventions on determinants of medication adherence: process evaluation applying the health action process approach and habit theory alongside a randomized controlled trial

Division of Type 1 Diabetes Responsibility in Latinx and Non-Latinx White Mother-Adolescent Dyads

Diabetes stress contagion among romantic partners: a daily diary investigation