While the impact of schoolwork pressure, family structure, internet use, and obesity on mental health problems has been studied extensively at the individual level, their impact at the societal level has rarely been explored. By studying associations between these phenomena at the country level from 2002 to 2018 within 43 European and North American countries, the present internationally-comparative study advances current knowledge on national-level drivers of adolescent mental health problems.
Findings
Within the study period, psychological complaints increased more strongly among girls than boys. Furthermore, schoolwork pressure, the average time spent on internet, and obesity were generally rising, while proportions of adolescents living with both parents in one house were generally declining. Findings showed that within countries, increases in proportions of adolescents reporting high schoolwork pressure, proportions of adolescents with obesity, and average time spent on internet use were independently associated with increases in proportions of adolescents reporting high psychological complaints. The multivariate model with all four predictors included simultaneously suggests that national-level increases in obesity and time spent on internet use were about equally strongly related to increases in psychological complaints, and both seemed to explain trends in psychological complaints more strongly than trends in schoolwork pressure. Furthermore, the observed associations between trends appeared in both girls’ and boys’ samples. However, based on the multivariate model, increases in the proportions of adolescents with obesity were more strongly related to increases in proportions of high psychological complaints in girls’ than in boys’ samples. Decreases in proportions of boys and girls living with both parents were also associated with increases in proportions of boys and girls with psychological complaints, but these associations disappeared when controlling for trends in schoolwork pressure, obesity, and internet use in the multivariate model.
With regards to trends found for obesity, it could be argued that the co-occurrence of increases in national-level obesity and psychological complaints is due the fact that adolescents who are overweight or obese are more likely to experience psychological complaints (Whitehead et al.,
2017), and therefore national-level increases in adolescent obesity rates might increase the proportion of adolescents with high psychological complaints. However, the observed country-level effects of obesity were robust to individual-level obesity (Brincks et al.,
2017). This finding suggests that the revealed effects of obesity also reflect societal effects that are independent of obese adolescents’ individual susceptibility to psychological complaints. High obesity rates may drive the implementation of targeted health policies and prevention programs aimed at reducing and preventing obesity. When such policies focus on individual responsibility and lifestyle choices, rather than addressing wider structural determinants of obesity, they may inadvertently contribute to the stigmatization of overweight (Brewis et al.,
2011), and could make (young) people more concerned with their own physical appearance (Hill et al.,
2021). This may, in turn, lead to a society with more adolescents facing mental health issues (Brewis et al.,
2018). Furthermore, results suggest that girls were more susceptible to the effect of high obesity rates within society than boys. This indicates that girls are not only more sensitive to experience mental health problems in response to individual stressors (Hankin et al.,
2007), but also in response to specific societal stressors, such as exposure to obesity and possible associated weight-based stigmatization.
In addition, although an increasing number of studies show no or a very small association between internet use and mental health problems at the individual level (Appel et al.,
2020; Meier & Reinecke,
2021; Odgers & Jensen,
2020), the present findings indicates that nevertheless, at the national level, increases in internet use and in the percentages of both boys’ and girls’ mental health problems were associated. This could imply that it is not necessarily adolescent’s individual engagement with internet that affects their mental health problems, but rather the wider online culture in which they grow up. High levels of internet use may reflect cultures where it is common to share and gather information with and about peers or others on social media, and this information is typically biased toward positivity (Lee et al.,
2017). Adolescents who grow up in a digital landscape characterized by unrealistic portrayals of others may be prone to more negative self-evaluation and social comparison, ultimately harming their mental health (Verduyn et al.,
2017). It should be noted, however, that in these analyses it was not possible to control for internet use at the individual level, which would provide more accurate estimates of the effect of internet use at the societal level (Brincks et al.,
2017). However, it is expected that the association between national-level trends in internet use and psychological complaints is less affected by individual-level behaviors than the other included national-level predictors, because review studies show a nonexistent or small association between individual-level internet use and mental health problems (Appel et al.,
2020; Meier & Reinecke,
2021; Odgers & Jensen,
2020), although other research contests this negligible association (Twenge et al.,
2022).
Next to trends in obesity and internet use, national-level increases in schoolwork pressure were also associated with increases in psychological complaints. However, this association was robust to the inclusion of schoolwork pressure at the individual level for girls only. This implies that societies where schoolwork pressure is salient may pose a risk to the mental health of particularly girls. Possibly, increases in schoolwork pressure at the national level are reflective of a changing, more stressful society: a society that is more competitive, meritocratic, and in which the level of perfectionism is high (Curran & Hill,
2019). This societal context, where demands and expectations are high, likely increases the vulnerability to mental health problems. That this is especially true for girls is in line with the general notion that girls exhibit greater levels of mental health problems than boys in response to stressors, particularly to achievement stressors (De Looze et al.,
2020; Hankin et al.,
2007). Correspondingly, research proposes that higher learning intensity (i.e., quantity and complexity of learning tasks completed by a student) might be more detrimental for adolescent girls’ mental health compared to boys’, especially in wealthier nations (Rudolf & Bethmann,
2023). Trends in boys’ schoolwork pressure and psychological complaints were no longer associated when controlled for the association at the individual level. This implies that although schoolwork pressure strengthened the probability of experiencing high levels of psychological complaints in boys, there was no additional societal effect of schoolwork pressure at the national level on the mental health of boys.
Another finding worth mentioning is that the ICCs of psychological complaints indicated that only a very small percentage of the variance in psychological complaints was explained by country-level factors that changed over time, although this is not unusual for repeated individual-level cross-sectional data (Schmidt-Catran & Fairbrother,
2016; Tormos et al.,
2017). This was because the largest share of the variance in psychological complaints was explained by individual-level characteristics. The observed associations in the present study, which were examined at the country-year level, therefore only explain a small part of the total variance in adolescents’ psychological complaints. Nevertheless, these findings are meaningful as the aim of present study was to explain national-level mental health trends rather than explaining total variance in adolescent mental health problems.
In addition, the associations between the national-level developments and psychological complaints were robust to confounding of each other (except for family structure), and, furthermore, to income inequality and economic performance. Despite this multivariate approach, it could be that these associations are explained by unobserved correlated trends. More specifically, societal factors such as the level of individualism, post-materialism, and meritocracy, likely play a role in explaining adolescent mental health trends as well. Cultures where these values prevail may place heavy demands on adolescents’ individual responsibility and self-reliance (Curran & Hill,
2022), taxing their mental health. Alternatively, it has been posited that increasing awareness of mental health problems in Western societies may lead adolescents with mild distress to become more inclined to identify with and report mental health problems (Foulkes & Andrews,
2023).
Implications
Overall, these findings imply that not only processes that take place at the individual level, but also at the national level, may impact the mental health of adolescents. This highlights the importance of policies which target broader societal and structural systems which impact on individuals, rather than focusing solely on vulnerabilities at the individual level. In relation to obesity, discussing individual behavior changes necessary to prevent or overcome overweight and obesity are of crucial importance. Still, clinical and public health practitioners, policymakers, as well as researchers may want to reflect how public health messages around adolescent obesity are framed and promoted. It may be important to recognize the role of the environment in promoting obesity, for example through the ready availability and promotion of high fat, high sugar foods and targeting toward young people. Similarly, the results on the association between increases in schoolwork pressure and psychological complaints seem to suggest that education systems which prioritize academic achievement and success over other outcomes may be harmful to young people’s mental health. As a response to this, strategies may need to be developed that increase the resilience of adolescents in dealing with the pressure from schoolwork. At the same time, and in order to prevent adolescents from becoming solely responsible for dealing with this societal phenomenon, a broader societal discussion on the desirability of this increasing focus on academic achievement and (policy) changes to redress this, seems warranted. Furthermore, findings from this study reveal processes before the COVID-19 outbreak, that was declared a pandemic in March 2020. By identifying trends in and drivers of psychological complaints before the pandemic, the present study facilitates future research aimed at understanding changes in adolescent mental health problems during and since the pandemic.
Strengths and Limitations
The present study includes nationally representative data of adolescents from many countries across a time period of almost two decades. It also combined data from different sources and used advanced statistical techniques to study the possible impact of societal developments that have characterized recent decades on adolescent mental health problems. Alongside these strengths, several limitations should be considered. First, the generalizability of these findings is limited to developed Western countries. Second, the number of countries and repeated measures yielded limited power to test the associations between all four predictors and high psychological complaints in the final multivariate model. Therefore, replicating the final model with more countries and/or more repeated measures is required to consolidate the finding that trends in family structure and psychological complaints were not related when controlling for other trends. Nevertheless, findings from Fig.
1 suggest that the potential effect of family structure would be small in magnitude. Third, (for some countries) observations on average time spent on internet, obesity, and income inequality were measured in other years than the HBSC survey rounds. Although using data from other years maximized the number of observations and thus power, it may have affected the precision of the model estimates. Especially the analysis with internet use warrants replication since this analysis had the most unmatched survey years. Fourth, the models did not include time as additional control variable due to multicollinearity. Although adding time could provide more precise estimations of associations between two time-varying phenomena within countries (Cosma et al.,
2020), in some cases it could also distort such associations (L. P. Wang & Maxwell,
2015). Fifth, a more specific measure than time spent on internet use, that distinguishes different types of or addiction-like internet or social media use (Boer et al.,
2022; Schønning et al.,
2020), could improve current insights into the association with mental health and the strength of potential harmful effects of internet-related behaviors. Sixth, although the use of dichotomous measures of schoolwork pressure and psychological complaints provides insight into more severe levels of these constructs and their associations, dichotomizing implies some loss of information. Seventh, it must be acknowledged that the measure used to capture gender (“Are you a boy or girl”) is not inclusive and does not capture adolescents that might be gender diverse. Future studies would need to use a more gender inclusive measure in order to capture the time trends in gender minority adolescents.