Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Training in pairs (dyad practice) has been shown to improve efficiency of clinical skills training compared with single practice but little is known about students’ perception of dyad practice. The aim of this study was to explore the reactions and attitudes of medical students who were instructed to work in pairs during clinical skills training. A follow-up pilot survey consisting of four open-ended questions was administered to 24 fourth-year medical students, who completed four hours of dyad practice in managing patient encounters. The responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. The students felt dyad practice improved their self-efficacy through social interaction with peers, provided useful insight through observation, and contributed with shared memory of what to do, when they forgot essential steps of the physical examination of the patient. However, some students were concerned about decreased hands-on practice and many students preferred to continue practising alone after completing the initial training. Dyad practice is well received by students during initial skills training and is associated with several benefits to learning through peer observation, feedback and cognitive support. Whether dyad training is suited for more advanced learners is a subject for future research.
Räder SB, Henriksen AH, Butrymovich V, Sander M, Jørgensen E, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. A study of the effect of dyad practice versus that of individual practice on simulation-based complex skills learning and of students' perceptions of how and why dyad practice contributes to learning. Acad Med. [Epub ahead of print].
Shebilske WL, Regian JW, Arthur W, Jordan JA. A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. Hum Factors. 1992;34:369–74.
Arthur W, Day EA, Bennett W, McNelly TL, Jordan JA. Dyadic versus individual training protocols: loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82:783–91. CrossRef
Kirschner F, Paas F, Kirschner PA. A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educ Psychol Rev. 2009;21:31–42. CrossRef
Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;78:197–203. PubMed
Crook AE, Beier ME. When training with a partner is inferior to training alone: the importance of dyad type and interaction quality. J Exp Psychol. 2010;6:335–48.
- Medical students’ perception of dyad practice
Martin G. Tolsgaard
Maria B. Rasmussen
Charlotte V. Ringsted
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum