Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

14-05-2022 | Review

Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review

Auteurs: Daniëlla M. Oosterveer, Henk Arwert, Caroline B. Terwee, Jan W. Schoones, Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2022

Abstract

Purpose

Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.

Methods

Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Results

Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied.

Conclusion

The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.

Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).

volgende artikel The patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS®) physical function and its derivative measures in adults: a systematic review of content validity

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

PROMIS measures assess physical, mental, and social aspects of health and are available both as computer-adaptive tests (CAT) and as traditional “paper and pencil” instruments (called short forms or scales). Raw scores of each PROMIS measure are converted to an item response theory (IRT)-based T score. A T score of 50 is the average for the USA general population with a standard deviation (SD) of 10.⁴ PROMIS short forms and scales are freely available in different languages at the PROMIS website (www.healthmeasures.net).

Reeves, M., Lisabeth, L., Williams, L., Katzan, I., Kapral, M., Deutsch, A., & Prvu-Bettger, J. (2018). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for acute stroke: Rationale. Methods and Future Directions. Stroke., 49(6), 1549–1556. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018912CrossRefPubMed

Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Bouter, L. M., Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Salinas, J., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Ackerson, T., Bernhardt, J., Davie, C., George, M. G., Gething, S., Kelly, A. G., Lindsay, P., Liu, L., Martins, S. C., Morgan, L., Norrving, B., Ribbers, G. M., Silver, F. L., Smith, E. E., Williams, L. S., & Schwamm, L. H. (2016). An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke, 47(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898CrossRefPubMed

Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., Rose, M., PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care., 45(5), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Arwert, H., Oosterveer, D. M., Schoones, J. W., Terwee, C. G., & Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. A systematic review on the current use of PROMIS item banks as outcome measurement in stroke patients. Archives of Rehabilitation Research & Clinical Translation. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100191.

Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4CrossRefPubMed

Schünemann, H., Brożek, J., Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. (2013). GRADE handbook—Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. Updated in 2013. Retrieved from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006CrossRefPubMed

10.

Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef

12.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lapin, B., Thompson, N. R., Schuster, A., & Katzan, I. L. (2019). Clinical utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement information system domain scales. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(1), e004753. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004753CrossRefPubMed

14.

Katzan, I. L., Fan, Y., Uchino, K., & Griffith, S. D. (2016). The PROMIS physical function scale: A promising scale for use in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurology, 86(19), 1801–1807. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002652CrossRefPubMed

15.

Katzan, I. L., Thompson, N. R., Lapin, B., & Uchino, K. (2017). Added value of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in stroke clinical practice. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(7), e005356. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Lam, K. H., & Kwa, V. I. H. (2018). Validity of the PROMIS-10 Global Health assessed by telephone and on paper in minor stroke and transient ischaemic attack in the Netherlands. British Medical Journal Open, 8(7), e019919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019919CrossRef

17.

Katzan, I. L., & Lapin, B. (2018). PROMIS GH (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health) scale in stroke: A validation study. Stroke, 49(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018766CrossRefPubMed

18.

Chen, C. X., Kroenke, K., Stump, T., Kean, J., Krebs, E. E., Bair, M. J., Damush, T., & Monahan, P. O. (2019). Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS pain interference short forms with legacy pain measures: Results from three randomized clinical trials. The Journal of Pain, 20(6), 664–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.010CrossRefPubMed

19.

Chen, C. X., Kroenke, K., Stump, T. E., Kean, J., Carpenter, J. S., Krebs, E. E., Bair, M. J., Damush, T. M., & Monahan, P. O. (2018). Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: Results from 3 randomized clinical trials. Pain, 159(4), 775–782. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Kroenke, K., Stump, T. E., Chen, C. X., Kean, J., Bair, M. J., Damush, T. M., Krebs, E. E., & Monahan, P. O. (2020). Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials. Journal of Affective Disorders, 266, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Kroenke, K., Stump, T. E., Chen, C. X., Kean, J., Damush, T. M., Bair, M. J., Krebs, E. E., & Monahan, P. O. (2021). Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) depression scales in three clinical trials. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01674-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

de Graaf, J. A., Visser-Meily, J. M., Schepers, V. P., Baars, A., Kappelle, L. J., Passier, P. E., Wermer, M. J., de Wit, D. C., & Post, M. W. (2021). Comparison between EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10 to evaluate health-related quality of life 3 months after stroke: A cross-sectional multicenter study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06335-8CrossRef

23.

Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Pellicciari, L., Chiarotto, A., Giusti, E., Crins, M. H. P., Roorda, L. D., & Terwee, C. B. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale v1.2: Global Health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Alcantara, J., Whetten, A., Zabriskie, C., & Jones, S. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis of PROMIS-29 V1.0, PROMIS Global Health and the RAND SF-36 from chiropractic responders attending care in a practice-based research network. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01725-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Cameron, L. J., Wales, K., Casey, A., Pike, S., Jolliffe, L., Schneider, E. J., Christie, L. J., Ratcliffe, J., & Lannin, N. A. (2021). Self-reported quality of life following stroke: A systematic review of instruments with a focus on their psychometric properties. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02944-9CrossRefPubMed

27.

Abma, I. L., Butje, B. J. D., Ten Klooster, P. M., & van der Wees, P. J. (2021). Measurement properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01647-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Terwee, C. B., Peipert, J. D., Chapman, R., Lai, J. S., Terluin, B., Cella, D., Griffith, P., & Mokkink, L. B. (2021). Minimal important change (MIC): A conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02925-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Kuijlaars, I. A. R., Teela, L., van Vulpen, L. F. D., Timmer, M. A., Coppens, M., Gouw, S. C., Peters, M., Kruip, M. J. H. A., Cnossen, M. H., Muis, J. J., van Hoorn, E. S., Haverman, L., & Fischer, K. (2021). Generic PROMIS item banks in adults with hemophilia for patient-reported outcome assessment: Feasibility, measurement properties, and relevance. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 5(8), e12621. https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review
Auteurs: Daniëlla M. Oosterveer
Henk Arwert
Caroline B. Terwee
Jan W. Schoones
Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland
Publicatiedatum: 14-05-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2022

The impact of care–recipient relationship type on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with dementia and their informal caregivers

Health-related quality of life in long-term Caribbean prostate cancer survivors: comparisons with prostate cancer-free men

Comparing patient global impression of severity and patient global impression of change to evaluate test–retest reliability of depression, non-small cell lung cancer, and asthma measures

Reply to: Concerns with study ABC

Discussion on the assessment of functioning in people under 18 years of age

Assessing sleep and pain among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS® sleep and pain short forms