Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

14-05-2022 | Review

Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review

Auteurs: Daniëlla M. Oosterveer, Henk Arwert, Caroline B. Terwee, Jan W. Schoones, Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.

Methods

Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Results

Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied.

Conclusion

The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.
Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
PROMIS measures assess physical, mental, and social aspects of health and are available both as computer-adaptive tests (CAT) and as traditional “paper and pencil” instruments (called short forms or scales). Raw scores of each PROMIS measure are converted to an item response theory (IRT)-based T score. A T score of 50 is the average for the USA general population with a standard deviation (SD) of 10.4 PROMIS short forms and scales are freely available in different languages at the PROMIS website (www.​healthmeasures.​net).
 
Literatuur
3.
go back to reference Salinas, J., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Ackerson, T., Bernhardt, J., Davie, C., George, M. G., Gething, S., Kelly, A. G., Lindsay, P., Liu, L., Martins, S. C., Morgan, L., Norrving, B., Ribbers, G. M., Silver, F. L., Smith, E. E., Williams, L. S., & Schwamm, L. H. (2016). An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke, 47(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898CrossRefPubMed Salinas, J., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Ackerson, T., Bernhardt, J., Davie, C., George, M. G., Gething, S., Kelly, A. G., Lindsay, P., Liu, L., Martins, S. C., Morgan, L., Norrving, B., Ribbers, G. M., Silver, F. L., Smith, E. E., Williams, L. S., & Schwamm, L. H. (2016). An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke, 47(1), 180–186. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​STROKEAHA.​115.​010898CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Arwert, H., Oosterveer, D. M., Schoones, J. W., Terwee, C. G., & Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. A systematic review on the current use of PROMIS item banks as outcome measurement in stroke patients. Archives of Rehabilitation Research & Clinical Translation. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100191. Arwert, H., Oosterveer, D. M., Schoones, J. W., Terwee, C. G., & Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. A systematic review on the current use of PROMIS item banks as outcome measurement in stroke patients. Archives of Rehabilitation Research & Clinical Translation. In press. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​arrct.​2022.​100191.
9.
go back to reference Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006CrossRefPubMed Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2010.​02.​006CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference de Graaf, J. A., Visser-Meily, J. M., Schepers, V. P., Baars, A., Kappelle, L. J., Passier, P. E., Wermer, M. J., de Wit, D. C., & Post, M. W. (2021). Comparison between EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10 to evaluate health-related quality of life 3 months after stroke: A cross-sectional multicenter study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06335-8CrossRef de Graaf, J. A., Visser-Meily, J. M., Schepers, V. P., Baars, A., Kappelle, L. J., Passier, P. E., Wermer, M. J., de Wit, D. C., & Post, M. W. (2021). Comparison between EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-10 to evaluate health-related quality of life 3 months after stroke: A cross-sectional multicenter study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(3), 337–346. https://​doi.​org/​10.​23736/​S1973-9087.​21.​06335-8CrossRef
26.
29.
go back to reference Kuijlaars, I. A. R., Teela, L., van Vulpen, L. F. D., Timmer, M. A., Coppens, M., Gouw, S. C., Peters, M., Kruip, M. J. H. A., Cnossen, M. H., Muis, J. J., van Hoorn, E. S., Haverman, L., & Fischer, K. (2021). Generic PROMIS item banks in adults with hemophilia for patient-reported outcome assessment: Feasibility, measurement properties, and relevance. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 5(8), e12621. https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuijlaars, I. A. R., Teela, L., van Vulpen, L. F. D., Timmer, M. A., Coppens, M., Gouw, S. C., Peters, M., Kruip, M. J. H. A., Cnossen, M. H., Muis, J. J., van Hoorn, E. S., Haverman, L., & Fischer, K. (2021). Generic PROMIS item banks in adults with hemophilia for patient-reported outcome assessment: Feasibility, measurement properties, and relevance. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 5(8), e12621. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​rth2.​12621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review
Auteurs
Daniëlla M. Oosterveer
Henk Arwert
Caroline B. Terwee
Jan W. Schoones
Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland
Publicatiedatum
14-05-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4