Skip to main content
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

21-07-2022 | Letter to the Editor

Response to the discussion of the assessment of functioning

Auteurs: Mark A. Ferro, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Extract

We thank our colleagues for their comments regarding our use of terminology and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in examining the psychometric properties of the parent-reported KIDSCREEN-27 in young children [1]. We agree that research directed to measures of quality of life for young children with chronic physical illness is warranted. …
vorige artikel Discussion on the assessment of functioning in people under 18 years of age
volgende artikel Publisher Correction to: Response to the discussion of the assessment of functioning
Literatuur
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.
Metagegevens
Titel
Response to the discussion of the assessment of functioning
Auteurs
Mark A. Ferro
Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Publicatiedatum
21-07-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03201-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2022

Health-related quality of life in long-term Caribbean prostate cancer survivors: comparisons with prostate cancer-free men

How do the number of missing daily diary days impact the psychometric properties and meaningful change thresholds arising from a weekly average summary score?

Discussion on the assessment of functioning in people under 18 years of age

  • Letter to the Editor

Health-related quality of life analysis in ovarian cancer clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors: a critical methodological perspective

  • Commentary

How important is subjective well-being for patients? A qualitative interview study of people with psoriasis

  • Open Access

Comparing patient global impression of severity and patient global impression of change to evaluate test–retest reliability of depression, non-small cell lung cancer, and asthma measures

  • Open Access