Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2015

27-03-2015

Measurement invariance of English and French Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) empowerment scales validated for cancer

Auteurs: Jennifer Brunet, Sophie Lauzier, H. Sharon Campbell, Lise Fillion, Richard H. Osborne, Elizabeth Maunsell

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

If measurement invariance (MI) is demonstrated for a scale completed by respondents from two different language groups, it means that the scale measures the same construct in the same way in both groups. We assessed MI of the French- and English-language versions of the five Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) empowerment scales validated for the cancer setting.

Methods

Data came from two cross-sectional studies of Canadian cancer survivors (704 English, 520 French). Single-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test whether the hypothesized factor structure of the French-language heiQ empowerment scales fit the data. Multi-group CFAs were conducted to assess different levels of MI conditions (configural, metric, scalar, strict, as well as MI of factor variances, covariances, and latent means) of the French- and English-language heiQ empowerment scales.

Results

The correlated five-factor model showed good fit in both language groups (goodness-of-fit indices: CFI ≥ .97; RMSEA ≤ .07). Goodness-of-fit indices and tests of differences in fit between models supported MI of the five-factor model across the two language groups (∆CFI ≤ −.010 combined with ∆RMSEA ≤ .015).

Conclusions

The French- and English-language heiQ empowerment scales measure the same five dimensions of empowerment in the same way across both language groups. Thus, any observed similarities or differences between French- and English-speaking respondents completing these scales are valid and reflect similarities or differences in empowerment across language groups, not measurement artifact. Consequently, heiQ empowerment data from English- and French-speaking respondents can be directly pooled or contrasted in data analyses.
vorige artikel Nursing home resident quality of life: testing for measurement equivalence across resident, family, and staff perspectives
volgende artikel Measuring attachment to life in old age: the Portuguese version of the Positive Valuation of Life Scale (Positive VOL)
Literatuur
1.
Maunsell, E., Lauzier, S., Brunet, J., Pelletier, S., Osborne, R. H., & Campbell, H. S. (2014). Health-related empowerment in cancer: Validity of scales from the Health Education Impact Questionnaire. Cancer, 120(20), 3228–3236.CrossRefPubMed
2.
McCorkle, R., Ercolano, E., Lazenby, M., Schulman-Green, D., Schilling, L. S., Lorig, K., et al. (2011). Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(1), 50–62.
3.
Lauzier, S., Campbell, H. S., Livingston, P. M., & Maunsell, E. (2014). Indicators for evaluating cancer organizations’ support services: Performance and associations with empowerment. Cancer, 120(20), 3219–3227.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Lovell, M. R., Luckett, T., Boyle, F. M., Phillips, J., Agar, M., & Davidson, P. M. (2014). Patient education, coaching, and self-management for cancer pain. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(16), 1712–1720.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Yun, Y. H., Sim, J. A., Jung, J. Y., Noh, D. Y., Lee, E. S., Kim, Y. W., et al. (2014). The association of self-leadership, health behaviors, and posttraumatic growth with health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 23(12), 1423–1430.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Brady, T. J., Kruger, J., Helmick, C. G., Callahan, L. F., & Boutaugh, M. L. (2003). Intervention programs for arthritis and other rheumatic diseases. Health Education and Behavior, 30(1), 44–63.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Newman, S., Steed, L., & Mulligan, K. (2004). Self-management interventions for chronic illness. The Lancet, 364(9444), 1523–1537.CrossRef
8.
9.
Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., & Whitfield, K. (2007). The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(2), 192–201.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Buchbinder, R., Batterham, R., Elsworth, G., Dionne, C. E., Irvin, E., & Osborne, R. H. (2011). A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: Development of a conceptual and measurement model. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 13(5), R152.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
Epstein, J., Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., Beaton, D. E., & Guillemin, F. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation of the heiQ questionnaire: Experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 360–369.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Kroon, F. P. B., van Der Burg, L. R. A., Buchbinder, R., Osborne, R. H., Johnston, R. V., & Pitt, V. (2014). Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis (review). Cochrane database of systematic reviews, issue 1. Art. no.: CD008963. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD008963.​pub2.
13.
Osborne, R. H., Batterham, R., & Livingston, J. (2011). The quality, impact and implementation of chronic disease self-management across settings: The international experience of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) quality monitoring system. Nursing Clinics of North America, 46(2), 255–270.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Schuler, M., Musekamp, G., Bengel, J., Nolte, S., Osborne, R. H., & Faller, H. (2014). Measurement invariance across chronic conditions: A systematic review and an empirical investigation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(56). doi:10.​1186/​1477-7525-12-56.
15.
Wahl, A. K., Langeland, E., Larsen, M. H., Robinson, H. S., Osborne, R. H., & Krogstad, A. L. (2015). Positive changes in self-management and disease severity following climate therapy in people with psoriasis. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 95(2), 317–321.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155–175.CrossRef
17.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.CrossRef
18.
Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–107.CrossRef
19.
Fillion, S., & Cook, S. (2012). Final report: Navigation Project CPAC and CIHR April 2007 to March 2012. Unpublished report.
20.
Hawkins, M., & Osborne, R. (2007). Questionnaire translation and cultural adaptation procedure. Version 1.0. University of Melbourne, Australia, p. 9.
21.
Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 147–157.CrossRef
22.
Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française. Psychologie Canadienne, 30(4), 662–680.CrossRef
23.
Willis, G. B. (1999, August). Cognitive interviewing: A “how to” guide. In Meeting of the American statistical association.
24.
Kornblith, A. B. (1998). Psychosocial adaptation of cancer survivors. In J. C. Holland, W. Breitbart, P. B. Jacobsen, M. S. Lederberg, M. Loscalzo, M. J. Massie, & R. McCorkle (Eds.), Psycho-oncology (pp. 223–241). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–38.
26.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
27.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
28.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466.CrossRef
29.
Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515.CrossRef
30.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504.CrossRef
31.
Morita, R., Arakida, M., Osborne, R. H., Nolte, N., Elsworth, G. R., & Mikami, H. (2013). Adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) for the evaluation of self-management education interventions. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 10(2), 255–266.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement invariance of English and French Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) empowerment scales validated for cancer
Auteurs
Jennifer Brunet
Sophie Lauzier
H. Sharon Campbell
Lise Fillion
Richard H. Osborne
Elizabeth Maunsell
Publicatiedatum
27-03-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0972-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2015

Quality of Life Research 10/2015 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients

Brief Communication

Measuring attachment to life in old age: the Portuguese version of the Positive Valuation of Life Scale (Positive VOL)

OriginalPaper

The concept of physical limitations in knee osteoarthritis: as viewed by patients and health professionals

OriginalPaper

The added effect of comorbidity on health-related quality of life in patients with asthma

OriginalPaper

Brazilian urban population norms derived from the health-related quality of life SF-6D

Review

Health-related quality of life among children, young people and adults with esophageal atresia: a review of the literature and recommendations for future research