Top

Gepubliceerd in:

28-06-2021 | Original Paper

Mass Media and Intensive Mothering Predict Motivators of Mother Engagement in Children’s Education

Auteurs: Rabia Filik-Uyanık, Hasibe Ö. Demircan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 8/2021

Abstract

The aim of this exploratory and descriptive study was to investigate the links between motherhood-related variables and the determinants of the motivators behind mothers’ engagement decisions related to their children’s education. Specifically, the purpose of the study was to examine the associations between mothers’ media exposures and belief systems and the motivators of their engagement decisions. In a quantitative study of 1027 mothers (M_age ₌ 32.91 years) with young children, the participants reported their media exposures and maternal belief systems, along with the factors motivating their engagement decisions within the first level of Hoover–Dempsey and Sandler’s parent involvement model. Path analysis (LISREL) revealed that mass media and maternal belief systems predicted the motivators influencing mothers’ engagement in their children’s education. However, the majority of the variables were not associated with their perceptions of invitations from school experts, i.e., teachers and schools. The results of the current study indicated a paradox in the family engagement process. On the one hand, mothers’ media exposures and intensive motherhood ideologies were associated with their commitment to be a part of their children’s education. On the other hand, their media exposures and intensive motherhood ideologies highlight their concerns regarding invitations of school professionals in a less caring way.

vorige artikel A Balancing Act: Working and Caring for a Child with Cancer

volgende artikel The Relationship Between Helicopter Parenting and Fear of Negative Evaluation in College Students

Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media+Society, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342.CrossRef

Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: toward an understanding of parents’ decision making. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.5.311-323.CrossRef

Barash, S. S. (2006). Tripping the prom queen: the truth about women and rivalry. St. Martin’s Press.

Bigner, J. J. (2010). Parent-child relations: An introduction to parenting (8th ed.). Pearson.

Brabazon, H. (2014). Mothers of global welfare state: How neoliberal globalization affects working mothers in Sweden and Canada. In A. O’reilly (Ed.), Twenty-first century motherhood: Experience, identity, policy, agency (pp. 199–215). Colombia University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain, M. & M. Cole (Eds), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 37–43). Freeman.

Brown, W. J., Basil, M. D., & Bocarnea, M. C. (2003). The influence of famous athletes on health beliefs and practices: Mark McGwire, child abuse prevention, and Androstenedione. Journal of Health Communication, 8(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730305733.CrossRefPubMed

Caputo, V. (2007). She’s from a ‘good family’: Performing childhood and motherhood in a Canadian private school setting. Childhood, 14(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568207078326.CrossRef

Chae, J. (2015). “Am I a better mother than you?: Media and twenty-first century motherhood in the context of the social comparison theory. Communication Research, 42(4), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534969.CrossRef

Chae, J. (2017). Explaining females’ envy toward social media influencers. Media Psychology, 21(2), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1328312.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Musweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Wiley-Blackwell.

Dornbusch, S. M., Glasgow, K. L., & Lin, I. C. (1996). The social structure of schooling. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.401.CrossRefPubMed

Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined all women. Free Press.

Driessens, O. (2013). The celebritization of society and culture: Understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(6), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912459140.CrossRef

Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). ‘Having it sll’ on social media: Entrepeneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media+Society, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337.CrossRef

Dufur, M. J., Parcel, T. L., & Troutman, K. P. (2013). Does capital at home matter more than capital at school? Social capital effects on academic achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.08.002.CrossRef

Ertan, N. C. (2017). Comparing fathers and mothers: Determinants of why they involve in their children’s education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.

Ex, C. T. G. M., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Korzilius, H. P. L. M. (2006). Young females’ images of motherhood in relation to television viewing. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02583.x.CrossRef

Fan, W., & Williams, C. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302.CrossRef

Fan, W., Williams, C. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2012). Parental involvement in predicting school motivation: similar and differential effects across ethnic groups. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.515625.CrossRef

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.CrossRef

Fisher, M. L., & Moule, K. R. (2013). A new direction for intrasexual competition research: Cooperative versus competitive motherhood. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099187.CrossRef

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.

Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition a social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504114.CrossRefPubMed

Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129.CrossRefPubMed

Glenn, E. N. (1994). Social construction of mothering: A thematic overview. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. N. Forcey (Eds), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 1–29). Routledge.

Green, C. L., Walker, J. M. T., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandier, H. M. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.532.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Harris, R. J. & Sanborn, F. W. (2014). A cognitive psychology of mass communication. Rootledge Communication.

Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.

Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). The work and family orientation questionnaire: an objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 2.

Henderson, A., Harmon, S., & Newman, H. (2016). The price mothers pay, even when they are not buying it: Mental health consequences of idealized motherhood. Sex Roles, 74(11–12), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0534-5.CrossRef

Henry, L. M., Bryan, J., & Zalaquett C. P. (2017). The effects of a counselor-led, faith-based, school–family–community partnership on student achievement in a high-poverty urban elementary school. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 45(3), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12072.

Hoffman, D. M. (2010). Risky investments: parenting and the production of the ‘resilient child’. Health, Risk and Society, 12(1), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698571003789716.CrossRef

Hoover-Dempsey, K., & Sandler, H. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference. Teachers College Record, 97, 310–331.

Hoover-Dempsey, K., & Sandler, H. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42.CrossRef

Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Wilkins, A. S., Sandler, H. M., & O’Connor, K. P. J. (2004). Parental role construction for involvement: Interactions among theoretical, measurement, and pragmatic issues in instrument development [Conference session]. San Diego, CA: The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. https://studylib.net/doc/5817725/parental-role-construction-for-involvement-in-the-child-s.

Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2005, March 22). The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement. Final performance report for the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (Grant No. R305T010673). U.S. Department of Education. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/bitstream/handle/1803/7595/OERIIESfinalreport032205.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447.CrossRefPubMed

Inzani, E. L., Marshall, H. H., Sanderson, J. L., Nichols, H. J., Thompson, F. J., Kalema-Zikusoka, G., Hodge, S. J., Cant, M. A., & Vitikainen, E. I. K. (2016). Female reproductive competition explains variation in prenatal investment in wild banded mongooses. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20013.CrossRef

Jenson, J. (2001). Re-Thinking equality and equity: Canadian children and the social union. In E. Broadbent (Ed.), Democratic equality: What went wrong? (pp. 111–129). University of Toronto Press.

Johnson, M. K. (2007). Reality monitoring and the media. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1393.CrossRef

Kruglanski, A., & Mayseless, O. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.195.CrossRef

Krzyżanowska, N. (2020). The commodification of motherhood: Normalisation of consumerism in mediated discourse on mothering. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 563–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1762986.CrossRef

Kyung, L. J. (1999). The glorification of ‘scientific motherhood’ as an ideological construct in modern Korea. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 5(4), 9–27.CrossRef

Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: class, race, and family life. University of California Press.

Lavenda, O. (2011). Parental involvement in school: A test of Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler’s model among Jewish and Arab parents in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(6), 927–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.12.016.CrossRef

Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s and don’ts and how to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854.CrossRef

McWayne, C. M., Melzi, G., Limlingan, M. C., & Schick, A. (2016). Ecocultural patterns of family engagement among low-income Latino families of preschool children. Developmental Pschology, 52(7), 1088–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040343.CrossRef

Montesi, M., & Bornstein, B. A. (2017). Defining a theoretical framework for information seeking and parenting. Concepts and themes from a study with mothers supportive of attachment parenting. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2016-0047.CrossRef

Murray, K. W., Finigan-Carr, N., Jones, V. C., Copeland-Linder, N., Haynie, D. L., & Cheng, T. L. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to school-based parent involvement for parents of urban public middle school students. SAGE Open, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014558030.

National Ministry of Education Parent Teacher Association Regulation, 28199 C.F.R. (2012). www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/02/20120209-6.htm.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ110/PLAW-107publ110.pdf.

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2014). Media representations of early human development: protecting, feeding and loving the developing brain. Social Representations of Brain Research, 97, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.048.CrossRef

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival guide. Open University Press.

Patrikakou, E. N., Weissberg, R. P., Redding, S., & Walberg, H. J. (2005). School–family partnerships: Enhancing the academic, social, and emotional learning of children. In E. N. Patrikakou, R. P. Weisberg, S. Redding, & H. J. Walberg, (Eds), School-family partnerships for children’s success (pp. 1–17). Teachers College Press.

Perse, E. M. (2001). Media effects and society. Erlbaum.

Plantin, L., & Daneback K. (2009). Parenthood, information and support on the internet. A literature review of research on parents and professionals online. BMC Family Practice, 10(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-34.

Pushor, D., & Ruitenberg, C. (2005). Place, interrupted: The visual counter-narrative of Princess Alexandra School [Conference session]. Victoria, British Columbia: Provoking Curriculum Conference. February.

Pushor, D. (2013). Bringing into being a curriculum of parents. In D. Pushor & The Parent Engagement Collaborative (Eds), Portals of promise: Transforming beliefs and practices through a curriculum of parents (pp. 5–19). Sense Publshers.

Reininger, T., & Lopez, A.S. (2017). Parental involvement in municipal schools in Chile: Why do parents choose to get involved?. School Psychology International, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034317695378.

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Veli. In T.C. Adalet Bakanlığı Hukuk Sözlüğü [Ministry of Justice Law Dictionary]. https://sozluk.adalet.gov.tr/veli.

Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001.CrossRef

Rosier, K. B., & Kinney, D. A. (2005). Introduction to Volume 11: Historical and contemporary pressures on children’s freedom. In D.A. Kinney & K. B. Rosier (Eds), Sociological Studies of Children and Youth (pp. 1–20). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-4661(05)11001-0.

Rothbaum, F., Martland, N., & Jannsen, J. B. (2008). Parents’ reliance on the Web to find information about children and families: Socio-economic differences in use, skills and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.12.002.CrossRef

Rutherford, B. M. (2009). Children’s autonomy and responsibility: An analysis of childrearing advice. Qualitative Sociology, 32, 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-009-9136-2.CrossRef

Sheldon, S. (2007.). Improving student attendance with school, family, and community partnerships. The Journal of Educational Research, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.5.267-275.

Smither, R. D., & Houston, J. M. (1992). The nature of competitiveness: the development and validation of the Competitiveness Index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052002016.CrossRef

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.CrossRef

Tabachnick, B., and Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistic. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

Tanrıöver, H. U., Vitrinel, E., & Sözeri, C. (2009). Gözlemlerden eylemlere: Türkiye’de cinsiyetçi olmayan bir medyaya doğru [From observations to actions: towards a non-sexist media in Turkey]. İletişim Dergisi, 10, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuiletisim.v10i10.5000004819.CrossRef

Teke, S. G. (2014). Dönüşen anneliğe yönelik netnografik bir analiz: Blogger anneler [A netnographic analysis on the transformation of motherhood: Blogger mothers]. Milli Folklor, 26(103), 32–47. https://www.millifolklor.com/PdfViewer.aspx?Sayi=103&Sayfa=29.

The Glossary of Education Reform (2014). Stakeholder. www.edglossary.org/stakeholder.

The Turkish Language Association. (n.d.). Ebeveyn. In Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri [Turkish Language Association Dictionaries]. https://sozluk.gov.tr/.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. American Psychological Association.

Uğurlu, E. G. (2013). Media’s role in the process of learning the role of motherhood. Erciyes University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 34(1), 1–24. https://www.dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/219620

Vancour, M.L. & Sherman, W.M. (2010). Academic life balance for mothers: Pipeline or pipe dream? In Andrea O’Reilly (Ed.), Mothering at the 21st century: Identity, policy, experience and agency. Columbia University Press.

Wall, G. (2010). Mothers’ experiences with intensive parenting and brain development discourse. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2010.02.019.CrossRef

Wall, G. (2013). ‘Putting family first’: Shifting discourses of motherhood and childhood in representations of mothers’ employment and child care. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.006.CrossRef

Walls, J. K. (2016). Mothering, intensive, in the United States. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs133.

Walker, J. M., Ice, C. L., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2011). Latino parents’ motivations for involvement in their children’s schooling: an exploratory study. Elementary School Journal, 111, 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/657653.CrossRef

Walker, J. M. T., Wilkins, A. S., Dallaire, J. P., Sandler, H. M., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (2005). Parental involvement: model revision through scale development. Elementary School Journal, 106, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/499193.CrossRef

Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [Computer Software]. Ed and Psych Associates.

Whitaker, M., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. (2013). School influences on parents’ role beliefs. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/671061.CrossRef

Williams, B. M., Christopher, K., & Sinski, J. (2017). “Who doesn’t want to be this hot mom?”: Celebrity mom profiles and mothers’ accounts of their postpartum bodies. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017720562.CrossRef

Titel: Mass Media and Intensive Mothering Predict Motivators of Mother Engagement in Children’s Education
Auteurs: Rabia Filik-Uyanık
Hasibe Ö. Demircan
Publicatiedatum: 28-06-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 8/2021
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02003-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2021

A Multilevel Approach to Understanding the Determinants of Maternal Harsh Parenting: the Importance of Maternal Age and Perceived Partner Support

Parent Perspectives on Co-located Parent Coaching Services within Pediatric Primary Care

Naturalistic Observations of Caregiver – Child Dyad Mobile Device Use

Effortful Control Mediates the Effect of Parenting Intervention on Preschool Callous-Unemotional Traits

Enhancing Social-Emotional Outcomes in Early Years (E-SEE): Randomized Pilot Study of Incredible Years Infant and Toddler Programs

The acceptability of Group Triple P with Brazilian parents