Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2017

25-04-2017

Relationships between environmental factors and participation in adults with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional multi-center study

Auteurs: Alex W. K. Wong, Sheryl Ng, Jessica Dashner, M. Carolyn Baum, Joy Hammel, Susan Magasi, Jin-Shei Lai, Noelle E. Carlozzi, David S. Tulsky, Ana Miskovic, Arielle Goldsmith, Allen W. Heinemann

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and evaluate a model of environmental factors-participation relationships for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and spinal cord injury (SCI), and test whether this model differed across three diagnostic groups, as well as other demographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study included 545 community-dwelling adults with neurological disorders (TBI = 166; stroke = 189; SCI = 190) recruited at three academic medical centers. Participants completed patient-reported measures of environmental factors and participation.

Results

The final structural equation model had acceptable fit to the data (CFI = 0.923; TLI = 0.898; RMSEA = 0.085; SRMR = 0.053), explaining 63% of the variance in participation in social roles and activities. Systems, services, and policies had an indirect influence on participation and this relation was mediated by social attitudes and the built and natural environment. Access to information and technology was associated with the built and natural environment which in turn influence on participation (ps < 0.001). The model was consistent across sex, diagnosis, severity/type of injury, education, race, age, marital status, years since injury, wheelchairs use, insurance coverage, personal or household income, and crystallized cognition.

Conclusions

Social and physical environments appear to mediate the influence of systems, services, and policies on participation after acquired neurological disorders. These relations are stable across three diagnostic groups and many personal and clinical factors. Our findings inform health and disability policy, and provide guidance for implementing the initiatives in Healthy People 2020 in particular for people with acquired neurological disorders.
vorige artikel Quality of life among adolescents living in residential youth care: do domain-specific self-esteem and psychopathology contribute?
volgende artikel Tooth loss and general quality of life in dentate adults from Southern Brazil
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA URL: http://www.rstudio.com/.
 
2
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
 
Literatuur
1.
Courtney-Long, E. A., Carroll, D. D., Zhang, Q. C., Stevens, A. C., Griffin-Blake, S., Armour, B. S., et al. (2015). Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults—United States, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 64(29), 777–783.CrossRef
2.
3.
4.
Taylor, C. A., Bell, J. M., Breidling, M. J., & Xu, L. (2017). Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 66, 1–16.CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
8.
Gostin, L. O. (2015). The Americans with Disabilities Act at 25: The highest expression of American values. JAMA, 313(22), 2231–2235.CrossRefPubMed
9.
World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
10.
Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(19), 1445–1460.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Field, M. J., & Jette, A. (2007). The future of disability in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
12.
Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Gray, D. B., Stark, S., Kisala, P., et al. (2015). Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 578–588.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Magasi, S., Wong, A., Gray, D. B., Hammel, J., Baum, C., Wang, C.-C., et al. (2015). Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 569–577.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Heinemann, A. W., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., Carlozzi, N. E., Garcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2015). Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 589–595.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Stiens, S. A., Kirshblum, S. C., Groah, S. L., McKinley, W. O., & Gittler, M. S. (2002). 4. Optimal participation in life after spinal cord injury: Physical, psychosocial, and economic reintegration into the environment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S72–S81.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hammel, J., Jones, R., Gossett, A., & Morgan, E. (2006). Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 13(3), 43–58.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Whiteneck, G. G., Gerhart, K. A., & Cusick, C. P. (2004). Identifying environmental factors that influence the outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 19(3), 191–204.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association Press.CrossRef
19.
Schulz, A., & Northridge, M. E. (2004). Social determinants of health: implications for environmental health promotion. Health Education & Behavior, 31(4), 455–471.CrossRef
20.
Lai, J.-S., Hammel, J., Jerousek, S., Goldsmith, A., Miskovic, A., Baum, C., et al. (2016). An Item Bank to Measure Systems, Services, and Policies: Environmental Factors Affecting People with Disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97, 2102–2112.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bricout, J. C., & Gray, D. B. (2006). Community receptivity: The ecology of disabled persons’ participation in the physical, political and social environments. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(1), 1–21.CrossRef
22.
Hollingsworth, H., & Gray, D. B. (2010). Structural equation modeling of the relationships between participation in leisure activities and community environments by people with mobility impairments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(8), 1174–1181.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Heinemann, A. W., Miskovic, A., Semik, P., Wong, A., Dashner, J., Baum, C., et al. (2016). Measuring environmental factors: Unique and overlapping International Classification Functioning, Disability and Health coverage of 5 instruments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(12), 2113–2122.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Williams, D. H., Levin, H. S., & Eisenberg, H. M. (1990). Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery, 27(3), 422–428.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data Center (2006). Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data Base Inclusion Criteria.
26.
Kirshblum, S. C., Burns, S. P., Biering-Sorensen, F., Donovan, W., Graves, D. E., Jha, A., et al. (2011). International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 34(6), 535–546.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Van Swieten, J., Koudstaal, P., Visser, M., Schouten, H., & Van Gijn, J. (1988). Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke, 19(5), 604–607.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Bailey, I. L., & Lovie, J. E. (1976). New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. American journal of optometry and physiological optics, 53(11), 740–745.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT4). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
30.
Enderby, P. M., Wood, V. A., Wade, D. T., & Hewer, R. L. (1986). The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Disability and Rehabilitation, 8(4), 166–170.
31.
Hahn, E. A., DeVellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1035–1044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Heinemann, A. W., Magasi, S., Bode, R. K., Hammel, J., Whiteneck, G. G., Bogner, J., et al. (2013). Measuring enfranchisement: Importance of and control over participation by people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(11), 2157–2165.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hobart, J. C., Cano, S. J., Zajicek, J. P., & Thompson, A. J. (2007). Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. The Lancet Neurology, 6(12), 1094–1105.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Whiteneck, G. G., Harrison-Felix, C. L., Mellick, D. C., Brooks, C., Charlifue, S. B., & Gerhart, K. A. (2004). Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(8), 1324–1335.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Keysor, J., Jette, A., & Haley, S. (2005). Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(1), 37–44.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Heinemann, A. W., Lai, J.-S., Wong, A., Dashner, J., Magasi, S., Hahn, E. A., et al. (2016). Using the ICF’s environmental factors framework to develop an item bank measuring built and natural environmental features affecting persons with disabilities. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-016-1314-6.PubMed
37.
Garcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., Magasi, S., Lai, J.-S., Semik, P., Hammel, J., et al. (2014). Development of self-report measures of social attitudes that act as environmental barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 596–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Bauer, P. J., et al. (2013). Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology, 80(11 Supplement 3), S54–S64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Casaletto, K. B., Umlauf, A., Beaumont, J., Gershon, R., Slotkin, J., Akshoomoff, N., et al. (2015). Demographically corrected normative standards for the English version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(05), 378–391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
41.
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRef
42.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. A. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
43.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.​1080/​1070551990954011​8.CrossRef
44.
Weston, R., Gore, P. A., Jr., Chan, F., & Catalano, D. (2008). An introduction to using structural equation models in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(3), 340–356.CrossRef
45.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRef
46.
Hahn, E. A., Garcia, S. F., Lai, J.-S., Miskovic, A., Jerousek, S., Semik, P., et al. (2016). Measuring Access to Information and Technology: Environmental Factors Affecting Persons With Neurologic Disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(8), 1284–1294.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Iezzoni, L. I., & Freedman, V. A. (2008). Turning the disability tide: the importance of definitions. JAMA, 299(3), 332–334.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (Vol. 1, pp. 137–173). New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Gray, J. A., Zimmerman, J. L., & Rimmer, J. H. (2012). Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: Disability and universal design relevant? Disability and Health Journal, 5(2), 87–101.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Lawson, A. (2006). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: New Era or False Dawn? Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 563–619.
51.
World Health Organization. (2014). WHO global disability action plan 2014–2021: better health for all people with disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Metagegevens
Titel
Relationships between environmental factors and participation in adults with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional multi-center study
Auteurs
Alex W. K. Wong
Sheryl Ng
Jessica Dashner
M. Carolyn Baum
Joy Hammel
Susan Magasi
Jin-Shei Lai
Noelle E. Carlozzi
David S. Tulsky
Ana Miskovic
Arielle Goldsmith
Allen W. Heinemann
Publicatiedatum
25-04-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1586-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2017

Quality of Life Research 10/2017 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Item-level psychometrics of the ADL instrument of the Korean National Survey on persons with physical disabilities

OriginalPaper

Race-specific associations between health-related quality of life and cellular aging among adults in the United States: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OriginalPaper

Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2

Review

Does exercise training augment improvements in quality of life induced by energy restriction for obese populations? A systematic review

OriginalPaper

A comprehensive questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life in coeliac disease (CDQL)

OriginalPaper

Associations between illness duration and health-related quality of life in specified mental and physical chronic health conditions: results from a population-based survey