Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 8/2012

01-10-2012

Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses

Auteurs: Seija K. Kromm, Jennifer Bethell, Ferne Kraglund, Sarah A. Edwards, Audrey Laporte, Peter C. Coyte, Wendy J. Ungar

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Measuring utility for cost-utility analysis (CUA) is challenging in children. The objectives were to characterize pediatric CUAs, appraise their quality, and identify determinants of higher quality.

Methods

Descriptive data were imported from the PEDE database for 305 pediatric CUAs published from 1997 to 2009, and quality was rated using the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ) in 213 studies. The impact on quality of publication year, journal type, and whether utility was measured was analyzed using multiple regression.

Results

CUAs increased over time and the largest proportion was from North America (38%). Children aged 1–12 years (39%) and preventative interventions (51%) were studied most frequently. Whereas a societal perspective was most common in papers published before 2007 (49%), a third-party payer perspective was subsequently most frequent (63%). Utility was measured prospectively in 8% of studies. Domains that demonstrated the poorest quality were Perspective, Costs and resource use, Outcomes, Analysis, Incremental analysis and Conflict of interest. Quality increased significantly over time for most domains and was greater in studies published in methods/health economic journals.

Conclusions

The quality of pediatric CUAs is increasing. Few studies ascertain utility prospectively, suggesting the need for better instruments for pediatric health state valuation and measurement.
Literatuur
2.
3.
go back to reference Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, B. J. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, B. J. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
go back to reference Office of Health Economics, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Associations. Trends in economic evaluation. The Health Economic Evaluations Database (OHE HEED). (2004). London. OHE-IFPMA. OHE Briefing: England. Office of Health Economics, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Associations. Trends in economic evaluation. The Health Economic Evaluations Database (OHE HEED). (2004). London. OHE-IFPMA. OHE Briefing: England.
5.
go back to reference Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2004). Trends in pediatric health economic evaluation: 1980 to 1999. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 26–29.PubMed Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2004). Trends in pediatric health economic evaluation: 1980 to 1999. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 26–29.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ungar, W. J., & Gerber, A. (2010). The uniqueness of child health and challenges to measuring costs and consequences. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ungar, W. J., & Gerber, A. (2010). The uniqueness of child health and challenges to measuring costs and consequences. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
go back to reference Sung, L., Petrou, S., & Ungar, W. J. (2010). Measurement of health utilities in children. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 77–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sung, L., Petrou, S., & Ungar, W. J. (2010). Measurement of health utilities in children. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 77–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
go back to reference Prosser, L. A., Hammitt, J. K., & Keren, R. (2007). Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics, 25, 697–702.CrossRef Prosser, L. A., Hammitt, J. K., & Keren, R. (2007). Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics, 25, 697–702.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Prosser, L. A. (2009). Current challenges and future research in measuring preferences for pediatric health outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 7–9.PubMedCrossRef Prosser, L. A. (2009). Current challenges and future research in measuring preferences for pediatric health outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 7–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Petrou, S. (2003). Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Economics, 12, 697–702.PubMedCrossRef Petrou, S. (2003). Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Economics, 12, 697–702.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Griebsch, I., Coast, J., & Brown, J. (2005). Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: A critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Pediatrics, 115, e600–e614.PubMedCrossRef Griebsch, I., Coast, J., & Brown, J. (2005). Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: A critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Pediatrics, 115, e600–e614.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tarride, J. E., Burke, N., Bischof, M., Hopkins, R. B., Goeree, L., Campbell, K., et al. (2010). A review of health utilities across conditions common in pediatric and adult populations. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 1–11.CrossRef Tarride, J. E., Burke, N., Bischof, M., Hopkins, R. B., Goeree, L., Campbell, K., et al. (2010). A review of health utilities across conditions common in pediatric and adult populations. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 1–11.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.CrossRef The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Apajasalo, M., Sintonen, H., Holmberg, C., Sinkkonen, J., Aalberg, V., Pihko, H., et al. (1996). Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen dimensional health-related measure (16D). Quality of Life Research, 5, 205–211.PubMedCrossRef Apajasalo, M., Sintonen, H., Holmberg, C., Sinkkonen, J., Aalberg, V., Pihko, H., et al. (1996). Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen dimensional health-related measure (16D). Quality of Life Research, 5, 205–211.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ungar, W. J., Mirabelli, C., Cousins, M., & Boydell, K. M. (2006). A qualitative analysis of a dyad approach to health-related quality of life measurement in children with asthma. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2354–2366.PubMedCrossRef Ungar, W. J., Mirabelli, C., Cousins, M., & Boydell, K. M. (2006). A qualitative analysis of a dyad approach to health-related quality of life measurement in children with asthma. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2354–2366.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang, Q., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G., & Barr, R. (2002). How robust is the health utilities index mark 2 utility function? Medical Decision Making, 22, 350–358.PubMed Wang, Q., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G., & Barr, R. (2002). How robust is the health utilities index mark 2 utility function? Medical Decision Making, 22, 350–358.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Keren, R., Pati, S., & Feudtner, C. (2004). The generation gap: Differences between children and adults pertinent to economic evaluations of health interventions. Pharmacoeconomics, 22, 71–81.PubMedCrossRef Keren, R., Pati, S., & Feudtner, C. (2004). The generation gap: Differences between children and adults pertinent to economic evaluations of health interventions. Pharmacoeconomics, 22, 71–81.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Matza, L., Swensen, A., Flood, E., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in Health, 7, 79–92.PubMedCrossRef Matza, L., Swensen, A., Flood, E., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in Health, 7, 79–92.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 1–157.PubMed Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 1–157.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B. L., Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Burrows, E., Rosenbaum, P. L., et al. (1999). Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1991–1997.PubMedCrossRef Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B. L., Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Burrows, E., Rosenbaum, P. L., et al. (1999). Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1991–1997.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dickie, M., & Gerking, S. (2006). Valuing children’s health: parental perspectives. In economic valuation of environmental health risks to children (pp. 121–158). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Dickie, M., & Gerking, S. (2006). Valuing children’s health: parental perspectives. In economic valuation of environmental health risks to children (pp. 121–158). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22.
go back to reference Neumann, P. J., Greenberg, D., Olchanski, N. V., Stone, P. W., & Rosen, A. B. (2005). Growth and quality of the cost-utility literature, 1976–2001. Value in Health, 8, 3–9.PubMedCrossRef Neumann, P. J., Greenberg, D., Olchanski, N. V., Stone, P. W., & Rosen, A. B. (2005). Growth and quality of the cost-utility literature, 1976–2001. Value in Health, 8, 3–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
go back to reference Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
go back to reference Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2003). The pediatric economic database evaluation (PEDE) project: Establishing a database to study trends in pediatric economic evaluation. Medical Care, 41, 1142–1152.PubMedCrossRef Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2003). The pediatric economic database evaluation (PEDE) project: Establishing a database to study trends in pediatric economic evaluation. Medical Care, 41, 1142–1152.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2003). The pediatric quality appraisal questionnaire: An instrument for evaluation of the pediatric health economics literature. Value in Health, 6, 584–594.PubMedCrossRef Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2003). The pediatric quality appraisal questionnaire: An instrument for evaluation of the pediatric health economics literature. Value in Health, 6, 584–594.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2005). Quality appraisal of pediatric health economic evaluations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 21, 203–210.PubMed Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2005). Quality appraisal of pediatric health economic evaluations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 21, 203–210.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Au, F., Prahardhi, S., & Shiell, A. (2008). Reliability of two instruments for critical assessment of economic evaluations. Value in Health, 11, 435–439.PubMedCrossRef Au, F., Prahardhi, S., & Shiell, A. (2008). Reliability of two instruments for critical assessment of economic evaluations. Value in Health, 11, 435–439.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ladapo, J., Neumann, P., Keren, R., & Prosser, L. A. (2007). Valuing children’s health: A comparison of cost-utility analyses for adult and pediatric health interventions in the US. Pharmacoeconomics, 25, 817–828.PubMedCrossRef Ladapo, J., Neumann, P., Keren, R., & Prosser, L. A. (2007). Valuing children’s health: A comparison of cost-utility analyses for adult and pediatric health interventions in the US. Pharmacoeconomics, 25, 817–828.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Eisenberg, D., & Freed, G. L. (2007). Reassessing how society prioritizes the health of young people. Health Affairs, 26(2), 345–354.PubMedCrossRef Eisenberg, D., & Freed, G. L. (2007). Reassessing how society prioritizes the health of young people. Health Affairs, 26(2), 345–354.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Brouwer, W. B. F., Niessen, L. W., Postma, M. J., & Rutten, F. F. (2005). Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses. British Medical Journal, 331, 446–448.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer, W. B. F., Niessen, L. W., Postma, M. J., & Rutten, F. F. (2005). Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analyses. British Medical Journal, 331, 446–448.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cairns, J. A. (2006). Discounting of children’s health: conceptual and practical difficulties. In economic valuation of environmental health risks to children (pp. 187–206). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Cairns, J. A. (2006). Discounting of children’s health: conceptual and practical difficulties. In economic valuation of environmental health risks to children (pp. 187–206). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
35.
go back to reference McGhan, W. F., Al, M., Doshi, J. A., Kamae, I., Marx, S. E., & Rindress, D. (2009). The ISPOR good practices for quality improvement of cost-effectiveness research task force report. Value in Health, 12(8), 1086–1099.PubMedCrossRef McGhan, W. F., Al, M., Doshi, J. A., Kamae, I., Marx, S. E., & Rindress, D. (2009). The ISPOR good practices for quality improvement of cost-effectiveness research task force report. Value in Health, 12(8), 1086–1099.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Neumann, P. J., Rosen, A. B., Greenberg, D., Olchanski, N. N., Pande, R., Chapman, R. H., et al. (2005). Can we better prioritize resources for cost-utility research? Medical Decision Making, 25, 429–436.PubMedCrossRef Neumann, P. J., Rosen, A. B., Greenberg, D., Olchanski, N. N., Pande, R., Chapman, R. H., et al. (2005). Can we better prioritize resources for cost-utility research? Medical Decision Making, 25, 429–436.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Carroll, A. E., & Downs, S. M. (2009). Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 21–25.PubMedCrossRef Carroll, A. E., & Downs, S. M. (2009). Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 21–25.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Petrou, S., & Kupek, E. (2009). Estimating preference-based health utilities index mark 3 utility scores for childhood conditions in England and Scotland. Medical Decision Making, 29, 291–303.PubMedCrossRef Petrou, S., & Kupek, E. (2009). Estimating preference-based health utilities index mark 3 utility scores for childhood conditions in England and Scotland. Medical Decision Making, 29, 291–303.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Varni, J., Burwinkle, T., & Lane, M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 1–9.CrossRef Varni, J., Burwinkle, T., & Lane, M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 1–9.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Moodie, M., Richardson, J., Rankin, B., Iezzi, A., & Sinha, K. (2010). Predicting time trade-off health state valuations of adolescents in four Pacific countries using the assessment of quality-of-life (AQoL-6D) instrument. Value in Health, 13(8), 1014–1027.PubMedCrossRef Moodie, M., Richardson, J., Rankin, B., Iezzi, A., & Sinha, K. (2010). Predicting time trade-off health state valuations of adolescents in four Pacific countries using the assessment of quality-of-life (AQoL-6D) instrument. Value in Health, 13(8), 1014–1027.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., et al. (2010). Development of the EQ-5D-Y: A child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 875–886.PubMedCrossRef Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., Devlin, N., et al. (2010). Development of the EQ-5D-Y: A child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 875–886.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Stevens, K. J. (2010). Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference-based, generic, pediatric, health-related quality-of-life measure. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3), 340–351.PubMedCrossRef Stevens, K. J. (2010). Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference-based, generic, pediatric, health-related quality-of-life measure. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3), 340–351.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses
Auteurs
Seija K. Kromm
Jennifer Bethell
Ferne Kraglund
Sarah A. Edwards
Audrey Laporte
Peter C. Coyte
Wendy J. Ungar
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0049-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2012

Quality of Life Research 8/2012 Naar de uitgave