Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

04-03-2019

Development and Initial Validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Other-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BORF)

Auteurs: Yuliya Kotelnikova, Lee Anna Clark, Elizabeth P. Hayden

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 3/2019

Abstract

The full-length Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality - 2nd Edition (SNAP-2, Clark et al. 2014) and various derivative versions were developed as measures of normal- and pathological-range personality traits. We report herein on the development and initial validation of the SNAP Brief Other-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BORF), an abbreviated version of the SNAP Other-Description Rating Form (ORF; Harlan and Clark Assessment, 6, 131–145, 1999). Our goal was to create a more efficient SNAP informant short form by making items more succinct rather than by eliminating items. SNAP-ORF word count was reduced by 68%, and the 1.5-page SNAP-BORF can be completed in approximately 10 min, one-third to one-half the time required to complete the SNAP-ORF. Mean-level differences between the SNAP-ORF and SNAP-BORF scales were negligible for all scales except propriety. Using exploratory factor analysis, we found the SNAP-BORF had a three-factor structure (NA vs. Low PA, Disinhibition vs. Constraint, and Antagonism) broadly consistent with extant literature. The SNAP-BORF showed good convergent/ discriminant validity with respect to the SNAP-family measures as well as measures of normal personality and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and worry. Results indicated that the SNAP-BORF is a useful measure when a very brief informant assessment of adaptive and maladaptive personality is needed.

vorige artikel The Development and Validation of the Thwarted Belongingness Scale (TBS) for Interpersonal Suicide Risk

volgende artikel Which Brief Is Best? Clarifying the Use of Three Brief Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

The difference between the SNAP and SNAP-2 is only in the diagnostic and validity scales. The temperament and personality trait scales of the instruments are identical. Because the SNAP-ORF assesses only the temperament and personality traits, we do not distinguish between the two “parent” measures, except where necessary, and hereafter refer to the full measure simply as the SNAP.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRef

Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893.CrossRefPubMed

Beck, A.T. & Steer, R.A. (1993a). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Beck, A.T. & Steer, R.A. (1993b). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Beer, A., Watson, D., & McDade-Montez, E. (2013). Self–other agreement and assumed similarity in neuroticism, extraversion, and trait affect: Distinguishing the effects of form and content. Assessment, 20(6), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113500521.CrossRefPubMed

Bornstein, R. F. (1993). The dependent personality. New York: Guilford Press.

Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150.CrossRef

Calabrese, W. R., Rudick, M. M., Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2012). Development and validation of big four personality scales for the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality—Second edition (SNAP-2). Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait- multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRef

Campbell, A., & Hemsley, S. (2009). Outcome rating scale and session rating scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures. Clinical Psychologist, 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13284200802676391.CrossRef

Chmielewski, M., & Watson, D. (2009). What is being assessed and why it matters: The impact of transient error on trait research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015618.CrossRefPubMed

Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Peter, J. P. (1984). Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 360–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151463.CrossRef

Clark, L. A. (1993). SNAP (schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Clark, L. A. (2005). Stability and change in personality pathology: Revelations of three longitudinal studies. Invited commentary, Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.5.524.CrossRef

Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (2014). Manual for the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive Personality-2 (SNAP-2). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Clark, L. A., Vanderbleek, E., Shapiro, J., Nuzum, H., Allen, X., Daly, E., Kingsbury, T., Oiler, M., & Ro, E. (2015). The brave new world of personality disorder-trait specified: Effects of additional definitions on prevalence and comorbidity. Psychopathology Review, 2(1), 52–82.CrossRef

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.CrossRef

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In O. P. John, R. W., Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 3 ^rd ed., (pp. 265–286). New York: Guilford Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212.CrossRefPubMed

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1985). NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T. Jr & McCrae, R.R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Eaton, N. R., Krueger, R. F., South, S. C., Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2011). Contrasting prototypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathology: Evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes, are robust. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710001650.CrossRefPubMed

Everett, J. E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18(2), 197–218.CrossRef

Everett, J. E., & Entrekin, L. V. (1980). Factor comparability and the advantages of multiple group factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15(2), 165–180.CrossRef

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Thomas: Springfield, Ill.

Finn, S. E. (1986). Structural stability of the MMPI in adult males. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 703–707.CrossRef

Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412445309.CrossRef

Furnham, A., Strait, L., & Hughes, D. J. (2012). Modern health worries and personality. Personality and Mental Health, 6, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1187.CrossRef

Galione, J. N., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2013). Identifying personality pathology associated with major depressive episodes: Incremental validity of informant reports. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.825624.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gamez, W., Watson, D., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2007). Abnormal personality and the mood and anxiety disorders: Implications for structural models of anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.08.003.CrossRefPubMed

Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the big five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030841.CrossRefPubMed

Hamby, T., & Ickes, W. (2015). Do the readability and average item length of personality scales affect their reliability?: Some meta-analytic answers. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000154.CrossRef

Harlan, E., & Clark, L. A. (1999). Short forms of the schedule for non-adaptive and adaptive personality (SNAP) for self- and collateral ratings: Development, reliability, and validity. Assessment, 6, 131–145.CrossRef

Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240.CrossRefPubMed

Kaurin, A., Sauerberger, K. S., & Funder, D. C. (2018). Associations between informant ratings of personality disorder traits, self-reports of personality, and directly observed behavior. Journal of Personality, 86, 1078–1101.CrossRef

Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002). Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation to self-reports and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/9.3.300.CrossRef

Koerner, N., Mejia, T., & Kusec, A. (2017). What’s in a name? Intolerance of uncertainty, other uncertainty-relevant constructs, and their differential relations to worry and generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 46, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2016.1211172.CrossRefPubMed

Kotelnikova, Y., Clark, L. A., Vernon, P. A., & Hayden, E. P. (2015). Development and validation of the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality brief self-description rating form (SNAP-BSRF). Assessment, 22, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114534959.CrossRefPubMed

Krueger, R. F., & Tackett, J. L. (2005). Progress and innovation: Personality disorders and the vanguard of psychopathology research. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 540–546. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.5.540.CrossRefPubMed

Linde, J. A. (2002). Validation of the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality-youth version (SNAP-Y): Self and parent ratings of adolescent personality (Order No. AAI3034123). Available from PsycINFO. (619969153; 2002–95012-180).

Linde, J. A., Stringer, D., Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2013). The schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality for youth (SNAP-Y): A new measure for assessing adolescent personality and personality pathology. Assessment, 20, 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113489847.CrossRefPubMed

Malatras, J. W., & Israel, A. C. (2013). The influence of family stability on self-control and adjustment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(7), 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21935.CrossRefPubMed

Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220.CrossRef

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509.CrossRefPubMed

Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State worry questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495.CrossRef

Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., McCain, J. L., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Widiger, T. A., & Campbell, W. K. (2016). Thinking structurally about narcissism: An examination of the five-factor narcissism inventory and its components. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2015_29_177.CrossRefPubMed

Mineka, S., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1998). Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 377–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.377.CrossRefPubMed

Morey, L. C. (2003). Measuring personality and psychopathology. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 377–405). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Morey, L. C., Warner, M. B., Shea, M. T., Gunderson, J. G., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C., . . . & McGlashan, T. H. (2003). The representation of four personality disorders by the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality dimensional model of personality. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 326–322.CrossRef

Morgan, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2010). Passive-submissive and active-emotional trait dependency: Evidence for a two-factor model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1325–1352.PubMed

Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (1998-2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Nuzum, H., Ready, R. E., & Clark, L. A. (2019, in press). Self- versus other-ratings of personality: A structural comparison. Psychological Assessment.

O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402.CrossRef

O'Connor, B. P. (2005). A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20017.CrossRefPubMed

Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Pincus, A. L., & Gurtman, M. B. (1995). The three faces of interpersonal dependency structural analysis of self-report dependency measures. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 69, 744–758.CrossRef

Pincus, A. L., & Wilson, K. R. (2001). Interpersonal variability in dependent personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 223–251.CrossRef

Ready, R. E., & Clark, L. A. (2002). Correspondence of psychiatric patient and informant ranges of personality traits, temperament, and interpersonal problems. Psychological Assessment, 14, 39–49.CrossRef

Ready, R. E., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Westerhouse, K. (2000). Self- and peer-related personality: Agreement, trait ratability, and the “self-based heuristic”. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2280.CrossRef

Reynolds, S. K., & Clark, L. A. (2001). Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 69, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00142.CrossRefPubMed

Ro, E., Stringer, D., & Clark, L. A. (2012). The schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality: A useful tool for diagnosis and classification of personality disorder. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735013.013.0004.CrossRef

Samuel, D. B. (2011). Assessing personality in the DSM–5: The utility of bipolar constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.577476.CrossRefPubMed

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationsh0069ps between the five-factor model and the DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet-level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

Schoenleber, M., Chow, P. I., & Berenbaum, H. (2014). Self-conscious emotions in worry and generalized anxiety disorder. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12047.CrossRefPubMed

Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102.CrossRefPubMed

Spain, J. S., Eaton, L. G., & Funder, D. C. (2000). Perspectives on personality: The relative accuracy of self versus others for the prediction of emotion and behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 837–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00118.CrossRefPubMed

Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Vol. II. Personality measurement and assessment (pp. 261–292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Troister, T., D'Agata, M. T., & Holden, R. R. (2015). Suicide risk screening: Comparing the Beck depression inventory-II, Beck hopelessness scale, and Psychache scale in undergraduates. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1500–1506. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000126.CrossRefPubMed

Van den Broek, J., Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., De Clercq, B., & Hofmans, J. (2014). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Join factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114.CrossRef

Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327.CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Chmielewski, M. (2008). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology: II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure. Journal of Personality, 76(6), 1485–1522.CrossRef

Widiger, T. A., Livesley, W. J., & Clark, L. A. (2009). An integrative dimensional classification of personality disorder. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016606.CrossRefPubMed

Westerhouse, K. C. (2002). Development and validation of the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality: Collateral report version (SNAP-CRV). Unpublished Dissertation.

Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Development and Initial Validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Other-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BORF)
Auteurs: Yuliya Kotelnikova
Lee Anna Clark
Elizabeth P. Hayden
Publicatiedatum: 04-03-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09729-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2019

Health and Functional Outcomes for Shared and Unique Variances of Interpersonal Callousness and Low Prosocial Behavior

Cultural Differences in Environmental Reward Across Individuals in China, Taiwan, and the United States

The Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ): Rationale and Initial Psychometric Properties

Which Brief Is Best? Clarifying the Use of Three Brief Versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

Anxiety Sensitivity Moderates the Effect of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms on Emotion Dysregulation among Trauma-Exposed Firefighters

Psychometric Evaluation of the Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire in a Community Sample