Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Original Article

Semantic alignment and number comparison

Auteurs: Jamie I. D. Campbell, Sean G. Sacher

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Are the quantity representations activated by Arabic digits influenced by semantic context? We developed a novel paradigm to examine semantic alignment effects (e.g., Bassok et al. in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:343–352, 2008) in number comparison. A horizontal word pair (either less more or few many) appeared for 480 ms to prime either relative magnitude (less more) or quantity (few many). Then a horizontal pair of single digits that were either successors (near) or differed by at least four (far) appeared above the word pair. Participants indicated verbally whether or not the word and digit pairs were congruent with respect to left-to-right ascending or descending relative magnitude. The RT advantage for far number pairs compared to near pairs (the distance effect) was greater with magnitude primes (81 ms) than quantity primes (17 ms), demonstrating a semantic alignment effect. This effect disappeared in Experiment 2 in which participants received identical stimuli but named the larger of the two digits and were free to ignore the primes. Nonetheless, mean RT in Experiment 2 was faster with prime and target pairs both ascending or both descending, but only with quantity primes. This prime-dependent order-congruity effect suggests that semantic alignment with respect to numerical order affected number comparison in Experiment 2. The results thereby demonstrate that number comparison exhibits task-dependent semantic alignment effects and recruits distinct numerical representations as a function of semantic context (e.g., Cohen Kadosh and Walsh in Behav Brain Sci 32:313–373, 2009).
Voetnoten
1
We explored analyses that treated reported use of the strategy “anchor on many or more” (n = 12) versus all other reported strategies (n = 12) as a between-participants factor. These analyses did not present any significant effects associated with this strategy classification.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Bassok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (Chapter 12, 401–433). Cambridge: MIT Press. Bassok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (Chapter 12, 401–433). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Bassok, M., Chase, V., & Martin, S. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 99–134.PubMedCrossRef Bassok, M., Chase, V., & Martin, S. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 99–134.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference French, P. L. (1979). Linguistic marking, strategy, and affect in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 425–449. French, P. L. (1979). Linguistic marking, strategy, and affect in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 425–449.
go back to reference Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124–138.PubMedCrossRef Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124–138.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jou, J. (2003). Multiple number and letter comparison: Directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 543–579. doi:10.2307/1423660.PubMedCrossRef Jou, J. (2003). Multiple number and letter comparison: Directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 543–579. doi:10.​2307/​1423660.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference LeFevre, J., & Kulak, A. (1994). Individual differences in the obligatory activation of addition facts. Memory & Cognition, 22, 188–200.CrossRef LeFevre, J., & Kulak, A. (1994). Individual differences in the obligatory activation of addition facts. Memory & Cognition, 22, 188–200.CrossRef
go back to reference LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., & Mrkonjic, L. (1988). Cognitive arithmetic: evidence for obligatory activation of arithmetic facts. Memory & Cognition, 16, 45–53.CrossRef LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., & Mrkonjic, L. (1988). Cognitive arithmetic: evidence for obligatory activation of arithmetic facts. Memory & Cognition, 16, 45–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Opstal, F., Gevers, W., De Moor, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 419–425. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.419.CrossRef Opstal, F., Gevers, W., De Moor, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 419–425. doi:10.​3758/​PBR.​15.​2.​419.CrossRef
go back to reference Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (2001). Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory & Cognition, 29, 383–393.CrossRef Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (2001). Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory & Cognition, 29, 383–393.CrossRef
go back to reference Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: structure and content. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: structure and content. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Zorzi, M., Stoianov, I., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Computational modeling of numerical cognition. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 67–84). New York: Psychology Press. Zorzi, M., Stoianov, I., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Computational modeling of numerical cognition. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 67–84). New York: Psychology Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Semantic alignment and number comparison
Auteurs
Jamie I. D. Campbell
Sean G. Sacher
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0331-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2012

Psychological Research 1/2012 Naar de uitgave