Abstract
When participants are asked to compare two stimuli, responses are slower for stimuli close to each other on the relevant dimension than for stimuli further apart. Previously, it has been proposed that this comparison distance effect originates from overlap in the representation of the stimuli. This idea is generally accepted in numerical cognition, where it is assumed that representational overlap of numbers on a mental number line accounts for the effect (e.g., Cohen Kadosh et al., 2005). In contrast, others have emphasized the role of response-related processes to explain the comparison distance effect (e.g., Banks, 1977). In the present study, numbers and letters are used to show that the comparison distance effect can be dissociated from a more direct behavioral signature of representational overlap, the priming distance effect. The implication is that a comparison distance effect does not imply representational overlap. An interpretation is given in terms of a recently proposed model of quantity comparison (Verguts, Fias, & Stevens, 2005).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Banks, W. P. (1977). Encoding and processing of symbolic information in comparative judgments. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 101–159). New York: Academic Press.
Chiao, J. Y., Bordeaux, A. R., & Ambady, N. (2004). Mental representations of social status. Cognition, 93, B49-B57.
Cohen Kadosh, R., Henik, A., Rubinsten, O., Mohr, H., Dori, H., van de Ven, V., et al. (2005). Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1238–1248.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 390–407.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219–250.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.
Holyoak, K. J., & Patterson, K. K. (1981). A positional discriminability model of linear-order judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1283–1302.
Jou, J. W., & Aldridge, J. W. (1999). Memory representation of alphabetic postion and interval information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 680–701.
Kaufmann, L., Koppelstaetter, F., Delazer, M., Siedentopf, C., Rhomberg, P., Golaszewski, S., et al. (2005). Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: An eventrelated fMRI study. NeuroImage, 25, 888–898.
Leth-Steensen, C., & Marley, A. A. J. (2000). A model of response time effects in symbolic comparison. Psychological Review, 107, 62–100.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1 476–490.
Maki, R. (1981). Categorization and distance effects with spatial linear orders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Memory & Learning, 7, 15–32.
Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 3–23.
Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.
Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635–647.
Pavese, A., & Umiltà, C. (1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1535–1545.
Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547–555.
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 191–205.
Shaki, S., Leth-Steensen, C., & Petrusic, W. M. (2006). Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments. Memory & Cognition, 34, 196–206.
Turconi, E., Campbell, J. I. D., & Seron, X. (2006). Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison. Cognition, 98, 273–285.
Verguts, T., Fias, W., & Stevens, M. (2005). A model of exact smallnumber representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 66–80.
Verguts, T., & Van Opstal, F. (2005). Dissociation of the distance effect and size effect in one-digit numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 925–930.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
F.V.O. and T.V. were supported by Grant G.0188.04 from the Fund of Scientific Research (FWO)-Flanders. W.G. is a postdoctoral researcher supported by the FWO-Flanders.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., De Moor, W. et al. Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 419–425 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.419
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.419