Ga naar de hoofdinhoud
Top

Infection after ICD implantation: operating room versus cardiac catheterisation laboratory

  • 01-03-2009
  • original article
Gepubliceerd in:
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Extract

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has evolved into an important treatment modality in the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. An ICD system comprises a pulse generator and one or more leads for pacing and defibrillation electrodes (ICD with single, dual, or triple chamber pacing).1 The first-generation devices required an abdominal pocket for the pulse generator and insertion of an epicardial lead system by means of thoracotomy.1 The epicardial lead system was later replaced by a transvenous non-thoracotomy lead system in the subclavian or cephalic veins while preserving abdominal pulse generators. Technological advances have made a gradual reduction in the size of the pulse generator possible, thereby permitting superficial implantation of the pulse generator in the anterior chest wall.1 This technique resembles pacemaker (PM) implantation. …
Titel
Infection after ICD implantation: operating room versus cardiac catheterisation laboratory
Auteurs
H. H. F. Remmelts
M. Meine
P. Loh
R. N. W. Hauer
P. A. Doevendans
L. A. van Herwerden
T. E. M. Hopmans
P. M. Ellerbroek
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2009
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086226
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.