Infection after ICD implantation: operating room versus cardiac catheterisation laboratory
- 01-03-2009
- original article
- Auteurs
- H. H. F. Remmelts
- M. Meine
- P. Loh
- R. N. W. Hauer
- P. A. Doevendans
- L. A. van Herwerden
- T. E. M. Hopmans
- P. M. Ellerbroek
- Gepubliceerd in
- Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 3/2009
share
DELEN
Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)
-
Optie A:
-
Optie B:Deel de link per e-mail
Extract
The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has evolved into an important treatment modality in the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. An ICD system comprises a pulse generator and one or more leads for pacing and defibrillation electrodes (ICD with single, dual, or triple chamber pacing).1 The first-generation devices required an abdominal pocket for the pulse generator and insertion of an epicardial lead system by means of thoracotomy.1 The epicardial lead system was later replaced by a transvenous non-thoracotomy lead system in the subclavian or cephalic veins while preserving abdominal pulse generators. Technological advances have made a gradual reduction in the size of the pulse generator possible, thereby permitting superficial implantation of the pulse generator in the anterior chest wall.1 This technique resembles pacemaker (PM) implantation. …
- Titel
- Infection after ICD implantation: operating room versus cardiac catheterisation laboratory
- Auteurs
-
H. H. F. Remmelts
M. Meine
P. Loh
R. N. W. Hauer
P. A. Doevendans
L. A. van Herwerden
T. E. M. Hopmans
P. M. Ellerbroek
- Publicatiedatum
- 01-03-2009
- Uitgeverij
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
- Gepubliceerd in
-
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086226
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.