Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2020

25-02-2020

FDA review summary of patient-reported outcome results for ibrutinib in the treatment of chronic graft versus host disease

Auteurs: Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis, Tanya Wroblewski, Virginia Kwitkowski, R. Angelo De Claro, Thomas Gwise, Vishal Bhatnagar, Ann T. Farrell, Paul G. Kluetz

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

On August 2, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration approved ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA) for the treatment of patients with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) after the failure of one or more lines of systemic therapy. The approval was based on results from a single-arm, multicenter trial that enrolled patients with refractory cGVHD. This paper describes the FDA review of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data from Study PCYC-1129-CA and the decision to incorporate descriptive PRO data in the FDA label to support the primary clinician-reported outcome results.

Methods

In this trial, the Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale (LSS) was used to capture patient-reported symptom bother. The 42 patients who received treatment were included in the analysis and completed the PRO tool. Post hoc descriptive analyses were conducted to further understand the measurement properties of the LSS.

Results

The analysis submitted to FDA reported that 18 patients had a ≥ 7-point improvement on the LSS overall summary score at any point during the assessment period. For 10 patients, the ≥ 7-point improvement was sustained for ≥ 2 consecutive PRO assessments. An assessment of the responder threshold suggested the threshold submitted to the FDA was reasonable and in line with clinical findings.

Conclusions

Overall, study PCYC-1129-CA demonstrated favorable clinician-reported cGVHD efficacy results that were complemented by results from PRO data, supporting the FDA’s positive benefit-risk assessment leading to regular approval. Limitations included the single-arm trial design, responder definition, and instrument shortcomings. These limitations were thoroughly explored through additional FDA post hoc analyses.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
5.
go back to reference FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. (2016). BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. (2016). BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource.
7.
go back to reference Pidala, J., Kurland, B. F., Chai, X., Vogelsang, G., Weisdorf, D. J., Pavletic, S., et al. (2011). Sensitivity of changes in chronic graft-versus-host disease activity to changes in patient-reported quality of life: Results from the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Consortium. Haematologica,96(10), 1528–1535.CrossRef Pidala, J., Kurland, B. F., Chai, X., Vogelsang, G., Weisdorf, D. J., Pavletic, S., et al. (2011). Sensitivity of changes in chronic graft-versus-host disease activity to changes in patient-reported quality of life: Results from the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Consortium. Haematologica,96(10), 1528–1535.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services; US Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). (2009). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring, MD. US Department of Health and Human Services; US Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). (2009). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring, MD.
10.
go back to reference Pavletic, S. Z., Martin, P., Lee, S. J., Mitchell, S., Jacobsohn, D., Cowen, E. W., et al. (2006). Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. Response criteria working group report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,12(3), 252–266.CrossRef Pavletic, S. Z., Martin, P., Lee, S. J., Mitchell, S., Jacobsohn, D., Cowen, E. W., et al. (2006). Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. Response criteria working group report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,12(3), 252–266.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee, S. J., Wolff, D., Kitko, C., Koreth, J., Inamoto, Y., Jagasia, M., et al. (2015). Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,21(6), 984–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.02.025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee, S. J., Wolff, D., Kitko, C., Koreth, J., Inamoto, Y., Jagasia, M., et al. (2015). Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,21(6), 984–999. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​bbmt.​2015.​02.​025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Yost, K. J., Cella, D., Chawla, A., Holmgren, E., Eton, D. T., Ayanian, J. Z., et al. (2005). Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,58(12), 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.008.CrossRefPubMed Yost, K. J., Cella, D., Chawla, A., Holmgren, E., Eton, D. T., Ayanian, J. Z., et al. (2005). Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,58(12), 1241–1251. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2005.​07.​008.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care,41(5), 582–592.PubMed Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care,41(5), 582–592.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
FDA review summary of patient-reported outcome results for ibrutinib in the treatment of chronic graft versus host disease
Auteurs
Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis
Tanya Wroblewski
Virginia Kwitkowski
R. Angelo De Claro
Thomas Gwise
Vishal Bhatnagar
Ann T. Farrell
Paul G. Kluetz
Publicatiedatum
25-02-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02448-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

Quality of Life Research 7/2020 Naar de uitgave