Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Pedobarography offers dynamic information about the foot, but the interpretation of its large data is challenging. In a prior study it was shown that attention can be restricted to pedobarographic midfoot load data. We aim to verify this observation in ankle osteoarthritic and contralateral feet.
We assessed both feet of 120 patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) and 35 healthy volunteers with AOFAS-score and dynamic pedobarography in barefoot condition. We introduce a new parameter, the Relative Midfoot Index (RMI), representing the depth of the midfoot weighted by the maximal force (MF) in the hindfoot and forefoot. Main outcome measures were the RMI, MF and contact times in the hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot. Ankle OA, contralateral and healthy feet were compared with ANOVA.
The RMI was significantly smaller in OA feet (0.65 ± 0.19) and contralateral feet (0.69 ± 0.15) than in healthy feet (0.84 ± 0.08, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between OA and contralateral feet. The RMI showed a correlation of 0.48 with the AOFAS score. Contralateral and OA feet were significantly different from healthy feet (p < 0.001) in all parameters except the hindfoot MF. An RMI <0.8 showed a positive predictive value of 80% and sensitivity of 78% for being unhealthy.
The RMI assists the interpretation of pedobarographic parameters and provides a user-friendly indicator for unhealthy foot conditions with a cut-off value of 0.8. The contralateral feet of ankle OA patients differed significantly from healthy feet and are therefore not suitable as control group.
Level of Evidence: 3 case control study
Burns J, Crosbie J, Hunt A, Ouvrier R. The effect of pes cavus on foot pain and plantar pressure. Clin Biomech. 2005;20(9):877–82. CrossRef
Hutton WC, Dhanendran M. The mechanism of normal and hallux valgus feet: a quantitative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;157:7–13.
Rosenbaum D, Schmiegel A, Meermeier M, Gaubitz M. Plantar sensitivity, foot loading and walking pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(2):212–4. CrossRef
Frigg A, Schäfer J, Dougall H, Rosenthal R, Valderrabano V. The midfoot load shows impaired function after ankle arthrodesis. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(10):1064–71. CrossRef
Schmiegel A, Rosenbaum D, Schorat A, Hilker A, Gaubitz M. Assesment of foot impairment in rheumatoid arthritis patients by dynamic pedobarography. Gait Posture. 2008;27(1):100–4. CrossRef
Bosch K, Nagel A, Weigend L, Rosenbaum D. From “first” to “last” steps in life – pressure patterns of three generations. Clin Biomech. 2009;24(8):676–81. CrossRef
Rammelt S, Grass R, Zawadski T, Biewener A, Zwipp H. Foot function after subtalar distraction bone-block arthrodesis: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86-B(5):659–68. CrossRef
Schuh R, Hofstaetter J, Hofstaetter S, Adams S, Kristen K, Trnka H. Plantar pressure distribution after tibiotalar arthrodesis. Clin Biomech. 2011;26(6):620–5. CrossRef
Nüesch C, Valderrabano V, Huber C, von Tscharner V, Pagenstert G. Gait patterns of asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis patients. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(6):613–8. CrossRef
MacWilliams BA, Armstrong PF. Clinical applications of plantar pressure measurement in pediatric orthopaedics. Pediatr Gait. 2000;40:143–50.
Schuh R, Gruber F, Wanivenhaus A, Hartig N, Windhager R, Trnka HJ. Flexor digitorumlongus transfer and medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy for the treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: kinematic and functional results of fifty one feet. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1815–20. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
- Facilitating the interpretation of pedobarography: the relative midfoot index as marker for pathologic gait in ankle osteoarthritic and contralateral feet
- BioMed Central