Ga naar de hoofdinhoud
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research

Erratum to: An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences

  • 01-02-2016
  • Erratum
Gepubliceerd in:
Auteurs
Federico Augustovski
Lucila Rey-Ares
Vilma Irazola
Osvaldo Ulises Garay
Oscar Gianneo
Graciela Fernández
Marcelo Morales
Luz Gibbons
Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2016

Extract

In the Original publication of the article, the mean value index has been published with an incorrect value in the abstracts part. The corrected line is “The mean index value, using the selected Uruguayan EQ-5D-5L value set, for the general population in Uruguay was 0.954”. …
vorige artikel An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences
volgende artikel Adaptation of the 10-Item Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire to Iranian Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Titel
Erratum to: An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences
Auteurs
Federico Augustovski
Lucila Rey-Ares
Vilma Irazola
Osvaldo Ulises Garay
Oscar Gianneo
Graciela Fernández
Marcelo Morales
Luz Gibbons
Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1146-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2016

An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences

The definition and role of quality of life in Germany’s early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach

Gender, race, BMI, and social support in relation to the health-related quality of life of cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society’s Study of Cancer Survivors II (SCS-II)

Psychosocial profile of pediatric brain tumor survivors with neurocognitive complaints

  • Open Access

Empirical validation of the English version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory

Quality of life in maltreated children and adult survivors of child maltreatment: a systematic review

  • Review