Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 2/2016

06-08-2015

Content validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) items in the context of HIV clinical care

Auteurs: Todd C. Edwards, Rob J. Fredericksen, Heidi M. Crane, Paul K. Crane, Mari M. Kitahata, William C. Mathews, Kenneth H. Mayer, Leo S. Morales, Michael J. Mugavero, Rosa Solorio, Frances M. Yang, Donald L. Patrick

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To assess content validity and patient and provider prioritization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, anxiety, fatigue, and alcohol use items in the context of clinical care for people living with HIV (PLWH), and to develop and assess new items as needed.

Methods

We conducted concept elicitation interviews (n = 161), item pool matching, prioritization focus groups (n = 227 participants), and cognitive interviews (n = 48) with English-speaking (~75 %) and Spanish-speaking (~25 %) PLWH from clinical sites in Seattle, San Diego, Birmingham, and Boston. For each domain we also conducted item review and prioritization with two HIV provider panels of 3–8 members each.

Results

Among items most highly prioritized by PLWH and providers were those that included information regarding personal impacts of the concept being assessed, in addition to severity level. Items that addressed impact were considered most actionable for clinical care. We developed additional items addressing this. For depression we developed items related to suicide and other forms of self-harm, and for all domains we developed items addressing impacts PLWH and/or providers indicated were particularly relevant to clinical care. Across the 4 domains, 16 new items were retained for further psychometric testing.

Conclusion

PLWH and providers had priorities for what they believed providers should know to provide optimal care for PLWH. Incorporation of these priorities into clinical assessments used in clinical care of PLWH may facilitate patient-centered care.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Jensen, R. E., Rothrock, N. E., DeWitt, E. M., et al. (2015). The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Medical Care, 53, 153–159. CrossRefPubMed Jensen, R. E., Rothrock, N. E., DeWitt, E. M., et al. (2015). The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Medical Care, 53, 153–159. CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kozak, M. S., Mugavero, M. J., Ye, J., et al. (2012). Patient reported outcomes in routine care: Advancing data capture for HIV cohort research. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 54, 141–147. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kozak, M. S., Mugavero, M. J., Ye, J., et al. (2012). Patient reported outcomes in routine care: Advancing data capture for HIV cohort research. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 54, 141–147. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1305–1314. CrossRefPubMed Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1305–1314. CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Haroutiunian, S., Donaldson, G., Yu, J., & Lipman, A. G. (2012). Development and validation of shortened, restructured Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey instrument (the S-TOPS) for assessment of individual pain patients’ health-related quality of life. Pain, 153, 1593–1601. CrossRefPubMed Haroutiunian, S., Donaldson, G., Yu, J., & Lipman, A. G. (2012). Development and validation of shortened, restructured Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey instrument (the S-TOPS) for assessment of individual pain patients’ health-related quality of life. Pain, 153, 1593–1601. CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brubaker, L., Khullar, V., Piault, E., et al. (2011). Goal attainment scaling in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: Development and pilot testing of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire. International Urogynecology Journal, 22, 937–946. CrossRefPubMed Brubaker, L., Khullar, V., Piault, E., et al. (2011). Goal attainment scaling in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: Development and pilot testing of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire. International Urogynecology Journal, 22, 937–946. CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mannion, A. F., Caporaso, F., Pulkovski, N., & Sprott, H. (2010). Goal attainment scaling as a measure of treatment success after physiotherapy for chronic low back pain. Rheumatology, 49, 1734–1738. CrossRefPubMed Mannion, A. F., Caporaso, F., Pulkovski, N., & Sprott, H. (2010). Goal attainment scaling as a measure of treatment success after physiotherapy for chronic low back pain. Rheumatology, 49, 1734–1738. CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lohr, K. N., & Zebrack, B. J. (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18, 99–107. CrossRefPubMed Lohr, K. N., & Zebrack, B. J. (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18, 99–107. CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Donaldson, G. (2008). Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement. Quality of Life Research, 17, 1303–1313. CrossRefPubMed Donaldson, G. (2008). Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement. Quality of Life Research, 17, 1303–1313. CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fredericksen, R., Edwards, T. C., Crawford, P. et al. (in press) Patient and provider priorities for self-reported domains of clinical care. AIDS Care. Fredericksen, R., Edwards, T. C., Crawford, P. et al. (in press) Patient and provider priorities for self-reported domains of clinical care. AIDS Care.
10.
go back to reference Magasi, S., Ryan, G., Revicki, D., et al. (2012). Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: Perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Quality of Life Research, 21, 739–746. CrossRefPubMed Magasi, S., Ryan, G., Revicki, D., et al. (2012). Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: Perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Quality of Life Research, 21, 739–746. CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fredericksen, R. J., Crane, P. K., Tufano, J., et al. (2012). Integrating a web-based patient assessment into primary care for HIV-infected adults. Journal of AIDS and HIV Research, 4, 47–55. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fredericksen, R. J., Crane, P. K., Tufano, J., et al. (2012). Integrating a web-based patient assessment into primary care for HIV-infected adults. Journal of AIDS and HIV Research, 4, 47–55. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lawrence, S. T., Willig, J. H., Crane, H. M., et al. (2010). Routine, self-administered, touch-screen, computer-based suicidal ideation assessment linked to automated response team notification in an HIV primary care setting. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 50, 1165–1173. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lawrence, S. T., Willig, J. H., Crane, H. M., et al. (2010). Routine, self-administered, touch-screen, computer-based suicidal ideation assessment linked to automated response team notification in an HIV primary care setting. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 50, 1165–1173. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bradley, K. A., Bush, K. R., Epler, A. J., et al. (2003). Two brief alcohol-screening tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Validation in a female Veterans Affairs patient population. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163, 821–829. CrossRefPubMed Bradley, K. A., Bush, K. R., Epler, A. J., et al. (2003). Two brief alcohol-screening tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Validation in a female Veterans Affairs patient population. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163, 821–829. CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Justice, A. C., Holmes, W., Gifford, A. L., et al. (2001). Development and validation of a self-completed HIV symptom index. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(Suppl 1), S77–S90. CrossRefPubMed Justice, A. C., Holmes, W., Gifford, A. L., et al. (2001). Development and validation of a self-completed HIV symptom index. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(Suppl 1), S77–S90. CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA, 282, 1737–1744. CrossRefPubMed Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA, 282, 1737–1744. CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1789–1795. CrossRefPubMed Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1789–1795. CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12–S21. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45, S12–S21. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brislin, R. W. (1986). Chapter 5: The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). London: Sage Publications. Brislin, R. W. (1986). Chapter 5: The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). London: Sage Publications.
20.
go back to reference Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 212–232. CrossRefPubMed Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28, 212–232. CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fowler, F. J. (1993). Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Fowler, F. J. (1993). Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
go back to reference Jabine, T. B. (1984). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines. Report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology. National Academies. Jabine, T. B. (1984). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines. Report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology. National Academies.
23.
go back to reference Willis, G. B. (1999). Cognitive interviewing: A “how to” guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. Willis, G. B. (1999). Cognitive interviewing: A “how to” guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
24.
go back to reference Harley, C., Takeuchi, E., Taylor, S., et al. (2012). A mixed methods approach to adapting health-related quality of life measures for use in routine oncology clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 21, 389–403. CrossRefPubMed Harley, C., Takeuchi, E., Taylor, S., et al. (2012). A mixed methods approach to adapting health-related quality of life measures for use in routine oncology clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 21, 389–403. CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Geller, G., Carducci, M. A., & Wu, A. W. (2010). Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1045–1055. CrossRefPubMed Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Geller, G., Carducci, M. A., & Wu, A. W. (2010). Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1045–1055. CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115–123. CrossRefPubMed Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115–123. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Content validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) items in the context of HIV clinical care
Auteurs
Todd C. Edwards
Rob J. Fredericksen
Heidi M. Crane
Paul K. Crane
Mari M. Kitahata
William C. Mathews
Kenneth H. Mayer
Leo S. Morales
Michael J. Mugavero
Rosa Solorio
Frances M. Yang
Donald L. Patrick
Publicatiedatum
06-08-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1096-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2016

Quality of Life Research 2/2016 Naar de uitgave