Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Gender differences in brain structure and function have long been an interest to neuroscientists. One region where these differences have been reported is in the band of white matter that connects the two cerebral hemisphere, the corpus callosum. The current study explores the possibility that differences in cognitive ability contribute to the observed gender effects. The focus here is on visuo-spatial processing as measured by mental rotation which has also been found to have significant gender differences. The results reported show that two segments of the corpus callosum revealed gender differences, the rostrum and the anterior midbody. Both segments connect cortical regions that have been implicated in mental rotation. Additionally, the gender effect found in the rostrum appears to be due to visuo-spatial processing while the anterior midbody appears to be affected by both visuo-spatial processing and gender. These results suggest that because neural structure and cognition are intimately intertwined, cognition should be accounted for when making group comparisons of neural structure.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.
Baroody, A. E., & Diamond, K. E. (2012). Links among home literacy environment, literacy interest, and emergent literacy skills in preschoolers at risk for reading difficulties. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32(2), 78–87. CrossRef
Crucian, G. P., & Berenbaum, S. A. (1998). Sex differences in right hemisphere tasks. Brain Cognit., 36, 377–389. CrossRef
Driesen, N. R., & Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on corpus callosum morphology: a meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23, 240–247.
Greces, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 212–222.
Newman, S. D. & Just, M. A. (2005). The neural bases of intelligence: a perspective based on functional neuroimaging. In R. Sternberg, J. Davidson & J. Pretz, (Eds.), Cognition & Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Newman, S. D., & Malaia, E. (2013). Neural bases of giftedness. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical Issues and practices in gifted education (2nd ed.). Waco: Prufrock Press.
Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2012). Home Literacy Environment and the beginning of reading and spelling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 40–50. CrossRef
Siegler, R. S. (1998). Children’s thinking. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Tracy, D. M. (1987). Toy-playing habits, spatial ability, science and mathematics achievement: are they related? Sex Roles, 17, 115–138. CrossRef
Tracy, D. M. (1990). Toy-playing behavior, sex-role orientation, spatial ability, and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(7), 637–649. CrossRef
Vandenberg, S. G. (1971). Mental rotation test. Boulder: University of Colorado.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817. CrossRef
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: a 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 860. CrossRef
Weiss, E., Siedentopf, C. M., Hofer, A., Deisenhammer, E. A., Hoptman, M. J., Kremser, C., Golaszewski, S., Felber, S., Fleischhacker W. W., & Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neuroscience letters, 344(3), 169–172. CrossRefPubMed
- Differences in cognitive ability and apparent sex differences in corpus callosum size
Sharlene D. Newman
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg