Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2016

12-08-2015 | Original Article

Dissociations of spatial congruence effects across response measures: an examination of delta plots

Auteurs: Jeff Miller, Nora M. Roüast

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Spatial congruence (“Simon”) effects on reaction time (RT) and response force (RF) were studied in two experiments requiring speeded choice responses to the color of a stimulus located irrelevantly to the left or right of fixation. In Experiment 1 with unimanual responses, both RT and incorrect-hand RF were sensitive to spatial congruence, and both showed larger Simon effects following a congruent trial than following an incongruent one. RT and incorrect-hand RF were dissociated in distributional (i.e., delta plot) analyses, however. As in previous studies, the Simon effect on RT was largest for the fastest responses and diminished as RT increased (i.e., decreasing delta plot). In contrast, Simon effects on RF did not decrease for slower responses; if anything, they increased slightly. In Experiment 2 participants made bimanual responses, allowing measurement of the spatial congruence effect for each trial. Responses were both faster and more forceful with the spatially congruent hand than with the spatially incongruent one, but neither of these effects decreased for slower responses. Overall, the results demonstrate that at least some motor-level effects of irrelevant spatial location persist for slower responses.
Voetnoten
1
Such decay might occur either because the activation produced by irrelevant location information is actively suppressed (Ridderinkhof, 2002a) or because it decays passively (De Jong et al., 1994). We will not consider this distinction further, however, because the present experiments do not attempt to differentiate between these two possibilities.
 
2
Interestingly, this evidence would be valuable regardless of the direction of the congruence effect on \({\mathrm{RF}_{r}}\). Whether the congruence effect involves an increase or decrease in \({\mathrm{RF}_{r}}\) for congruent trials, the critical issue for within-trial dynamics is how this effect changes across RT bins. If location-based activation effects decrease over time within a trial, then any congruence effect on \({\mathrm{RF}_{r}}\) should be larger for the faster responses than for the slower ones.
 
3
Where appropriate, all reported p values have been adjusted for possible violations of the sphericity assumption using the method described by Huynh (1978).
 
4
The mean of 642 cN might appear too high given that the average waveforms shown in Fig. 2a, d peak at less than 600 cN, but the apparent discrepancy arises due to well-known problems in comparing the properties of average waveforms with the average of the same property assessed in the individual waveforms contributing to the average (e.g., Callaway, Halliday, Naylor, & Thouvenin, 1984). Here, the peak of the average waveform is lower than the average of the individual waveform peaks because of temporal smearing. That is, the peaks of the individual waveforms are not perfectly aligned when computing the average waveform, so the peak of the average waveform is not as high as the average of the individual waveform peaks.
 
5
In analogous studies of flanker compatibility effects, Mattler (2005) reported that \({\mathrm{RF}_{r}}\) was larger with incompatible than compatible flankers, as if extra correct-finger activation was needed to overcome response conflict generated by incompatible flankers. A similar effect could increase responding finger force output in the present Simon task.
 
6
We thank Rolf Ulrich for pointing out this explanation.
 
7
In view of the small size of this effect, it is worth noting that each hand’s RT was measured with sub-millisecond accuracy in each trial. This was possible because a force reading was taken every 4 ms with 12-bit accuracy, and linear interpolation was used to determine the time at which the response threshold was crossed within a given 4 ms interval. Furthermore, force measurements were obtained using an analog-to-digital converter with direct memory access, so the times of force measurement were independent of the other operations of the computer (e.g., CPU activity).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Burle, B., Spieser, L., Servant, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2014). Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: Marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 1003–1010. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0561-6.CrossRef Burle, B., Spieser, L., Servant, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2014). Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: Marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 1003–1010. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-013-0561-6.CrossRef
go back to reference Burle, B., Van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 619–641. doi:10.1080/09541440540000121.CrossRef Burle, B., Van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 619–641. doi:10.​1080/​0954144054000012​1.CrossRef
go back to reference Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, H., & Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies. Psychophysiology, 21, 571. Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, H., & Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies. Psychophysiology, 21, 571.
go back to reference Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529–553. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.11.5.529. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529–553. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​11.​5.​529.
go back to reference Craft, J. L., & Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415–420. doi:10.1037/h0028843.CrossRefPubMed Craft, J. L., & Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415–420. doi:10.​1037/​h0028843.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731–750. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731–750. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​20.​4.​731.
go back to reference Eimer, M. (1997). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of automatic response activation in S-R compatibility situations. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Advances in psychology (pp. 51–73). Amsterdam: North Holland. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80027-1.CrossRef Eimer, M. (1997). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of automatic response activation in S-R compatibility situations. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Advances in psychology (pp. 51–73). Amsterdam: North Holland. doi:10.​1016/​S0166-4115(97)80027-1.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.CrossRef Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Franz, E. A. (1997). Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 684–704. doi:10.1080/713755726.CrossRef Franz, E. A. (1997). Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 684–704. doi:10.​1080/​713755726.CrossRef
go back to reference Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1278–1291. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.19.6.1278. Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1278–1291. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​19.​6.​1278.
go back to reference Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 331–344. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 331–344.
go back to reference Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C. A., Bonnet, M., & Vidal, F. (1999). Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: An electromyographic study in humans. Psychophysiology, 36, 522–526. doi:10.1017/S0048577299001602.CrossRefPubMed Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C. A., Bonnet, M., & Vidal, F. (1999). Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: An electromyographic study in humans. Psychophysiology, 36, 522–526. doi:10.​1017/​S004857729900160​2.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Helmuth, L. L., & Ivry, R. B. (1996). When two hands are better than one: Reduced timing variability during bimanual movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 278–293. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.278. Helmuth, L. L., & Ivry, R. B. (1996). When two hands are better than one: Reduced timing variability during bimanual movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 278–293. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​22.​2.​278.
go back to reference Hietanen, J. K., & Rämä, P. (1995). Facilitation and interference occur at different stages of processing in the Simon paradigm. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7(2), 183–199.CrossRef Hietanen, J. K., & Rämä, P. (1995). Facilitation and interference occur at different stages of processing in the Simon paradigm. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7(2), 183–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290. doi:10.1007/BF00419688.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290. doi:10.​1007/​BF00419688.CrossRef
go back to reference Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., Jaroszyk, F., & Lemański, D. (1995). The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 55, 57–64.PubMed Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., Jaroszyk, F., & Lemański, D. (1995). The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 55, 57–64.PubMed
go back to reference Jaśkowski, P., Verleger, R., & Wascher, E. (1994). Response force and reaction time in a simple reaction task under time pressure. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202(4), 405–413.PubMed Jaśkowski, P., Verleger, R., & Wascher, E. (1994). Response force and reaction time in a simple reaction task under time pressure. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202(4), 405–413.PubMed
go back to reference Jaśkowski, P., Wroblewski, M., & Hojan-Jezierska, D. (1994). Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 995–1002.CrossRef Jaśkowski, P., Wroblewski, M., & Hojan-Jezierska, D. (1994). Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 995–1002.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 229–238. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.2.229. Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 229–238. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​5.​2.​229.
go back to reference Kerzel, D., & Buetti, S. (2012). Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: A comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 456–461. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0246-6.CrossRef Kerzel, D., & Buetti, S. (2012). Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: A comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 456–461. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-012-0246-6.CrossRef
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 688–714. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.25.3.688. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 688–714. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​25.​3.​688.
go back to reference Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(7), 1089–1097. doi:10.3758/BF03205523.CrossRef Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(7), 1089–1097. doi:10.​3758/​BF03205523.CrossRef
go back to reference Mattler, U. (2005). Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 577–601. doi:10.1080/02724980443000089.CrossRef Mattler, U. (2005). Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 577–601. doi:10.​1080/​0272498044300008​9.CrossRef
go back to reference Mewaldt, S. R., Connelly, C., & Simon, J. R. (1980). Response selection in choice reaction time: Test of a buffer model. Memory & Cognition, 8, 606–611. doi:10.3758/BF03213780.CrossRef Mewaldt, S. R., Connelly, C., & Simon, J. R. (1980). Response selection in choice reaction time: Test of a buffer model. Memory & Cognition, 8, 606–611. doi:10.​3758/​BF03213780.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J. O., Franz, V., & Ulrich, R. (1999). Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 107–119. doi:10.3758/BF03211952.CrossRef Miller, J. O., Franz, V., & Ulrich, R. (1999). Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 107–119. doi:10.​3758/​BF03211952.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J. O., & Van Nes, F. (2007). Effects of response task and accessory stimuli on redundancy gain: Tests of the hemispheric coactivation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 829–844. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.829. Miller, J. O., & Van Nes, F. (2007). Effects of response task and accessory stimuli on redundancy gain: Tests of the hemispheric coactivation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 829–844. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​33.​4.​829.
go back to reference Plat, F. M., Praamstra, P., & Horstink, M. W. I. M. (2000). Redundant-signals effects on reaction time, response force, and movement-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 533–539. doi:10.1007/s002219900276.CrossRefPubMed Plat, F. M., Praamstra, P., & Horstink, M. W. I. M. (2000). Redundant-signals effects on reaction time, response force, and movement-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 533–539. doi:10.​1007/​s002219900276.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 2013–2025. doi:10.3758/APP.72.7.2013.CrossRef Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 2013–2025. doi:10.​3758/​APP.​72.​7.​2013.CrossRef
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and performance XIX (pp. 494–519). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and performance XIX (pp. 494–519). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). Delta plots in the study of individual differences: New tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/HD that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 197–215. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.197.CrossRefPubMed Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). Delta plots in the study of individual differences: New tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/HD that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 197–215. doi:10.​1037/​0021-843X.​114.​2.​197.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 369–377). New York: Guilford Press. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 369–377). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Rinkenauer, G., Osman, A., Ulrich, R., Müller-Gethmann, H., & Mattes, S. (2004). On the locus of speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 261–282.CrossRef Rinkenauer, G., Osman, A., Ulrich, R., Müller-Gethmann, H., & Mattes, S. (2004). On the locus of speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 261–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A. M. (2001). Brief bimanual force pulses: Correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1485–1497. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.6.1485. Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A. M. (2001). Brief bimanual force pulses: Correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1485–1497. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​27.​6.​1485.
go back to reference Simon, J. R., Acosta, E, Jr, Mewaldt, S. R., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22. doi:10.3758/BF03199380.CrossRef Simon, J. R., Acosta, E, Jr, Mewaldt, S. R., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22. doi:10.​3758/​BF03199380.CrossRef
go back to reference Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345–1363. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345–1363. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​28.​6.​1345.
go back to reference Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 972–990. doi:10.1080/713755672.CrossRef Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 972–990. doi:10.​1080/​713755672.CrossRef
go back to reference Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., & Miller, J. O. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 915–928. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.915. Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., & Miller, J. O. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 915–928. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​24.​3.​915.
go back to reference Vallesi, A., & Umiltà, C. A. (2009). Decay of stimulus spatial code in horizontal and vertical Simon tasks. The Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology, 136(4), 350–373. doi:10.1080/00221300903266580.CrossRef Vallesi, A., & Umiltà, C. A. (2009). Decay of stimulus spatial code in horizontal and vertical Simon tasks. The Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology, 136(4), 350–373. doi:10.​1080/​0022130090326658​0.CrossRef
go back to reference van Campen, A. D., Keuken, M. C., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2014). TMS over M1 reveals expression and selective suppression of conflicting action impulses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(1), 1–15. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00482.CrossRefPubMed van Campen, A. D., Keuken, M. C., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2014). TMS over M1 reveals expression and selective suppression of conflicting action impulses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(1), 1–15. doi:10.​1162/​jocn_​a_​00482.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(222), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00222. Van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(222), 1–13. doi:10.​3389/​fnhum.​2010.​00222.
go back to reference Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27(3), 731–751. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.731. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27(3), 731–751. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​27.​3.​731.
go back to reference Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of S-R correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31(3), 453–464. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453. Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of S-R correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31(3), 453–464. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​31.​3.​453.
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 705–731. doi:10.1080/02724980443000269.CrossRef Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 705–731. doi:10.​1080/​0272498044300026​9.CrossRef
go back to reference Zachay, A. (1991). Diskrete und kontinuierliche Informationsverarbeitungsmodelle zur Erklärung von Reiz-Reaktions-inkompatibilitäten: Evidenz für einen Antwortkonkflikt beim Simon-Effekt. [Discrete versus continuous information processing models of stimulus-response incompatibility: Evidence for response conflict in the Simon effect] (Unpublished master’s thesis,Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany.) Zachay, A. (1991). Diskrete und kontinuierliche Informationsverarbeitungsmodelle zur Erklärung von Reiz-Reaktions-inkompatibilitäten: Evidenz für einen Antwortkonkflikt beim Simon-Effekt. [Discrete versus continuous information processing models of stimulus-response incompatibility: Evidence for response conflict in the Simon effect] (Unpublished master’s thesis,Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany.)
go back to reference Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1543–1551. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.23.5.1543. Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber’s (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1543–1551. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​23.​5.​1543.
Metagegevens
Titel
Dissociations of spatial congruence effects across response measures: an examination of delta plots
Auteurs
Jeff Miller
Nora M. Roüast
Publicatiedatum
12-08-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0694-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2016

Psychological Research 5/2016 Naar de uitgave