Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Quality of life (QoL) measurements are considered important outcome measures both for research on multiple sclerosis (MS) and in clinical practice. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can improve the precision of measurements made using QoL instruments while reducing the burden of testing on patients. Moreover, a cross-cultural approach is also necessary to guarantee the wide applicability of CAT. The aim of this preliminary study was to develop a calibrated item bank that is available in multiple languages and measures QoL related to mental health by combining one generic (SF-36) and one disease-specific questionnaire (MusiQoL).
Patients with MS were enrolled in this international, multicenter, cross-sectional study. The psychometric properties of the item bank were based on classical test and item response theories and approaches, including the evaluation of unidimensionality, item response theory model fitting, and analyses of differential item functioning (DIF). Convergent and discriminant validities of the item bank were examined according to socio-demographic, clinical, and QoL features.
A total of 1992 patients with MS and from 15 countries were enrolled in this study to calibrate the 22-item bank developed in this study. The strict monotonicity of the Cronbach’s alpha curve, the high eigenvalue ratio estimator (5.50), and the adequate CFA model fit (RMSEA = 0.07 and CFI = 0.95) indicated that a strong assumption of unidimensionality was warranted. The infit mean square statistic ranged from 0.76 to 1.27, indicating a satisfactory item fit. DIF analyses revealed no item biases across geographical areas, confirming the cross-cultural equivalence of the item bank. External validity testing revealed that the item bank scores correlated significantly with QoL scores but also showed discriminant validity for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
This work demonstrated satisfactory psychometric characteristics for a QoL item bank for MS in multiple languages. This work may offer a common measure for the assessment of QoL in different cultural contexts and for international studies conducted on MS.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Baumstarck, K., Boyer, L., Boucekine, M., Michel, P., Pelletier, J., & Auquier, P. (2013). Measuring the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: A necessary challenge. Multiple Sclerosis International, 2013, 524894. doi: 10.1155/2013/524894. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., Gandek, B., & Institute, N. E. M. C. H. H. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. New England Medical Center: The Health Institute.
Leong, K. P., Yeak, S. C. L., Saurajen, A. S. M., Mok, P. K. H., Earnest, A., Siow, J. K., et al. (2005). Why generic and disease-specific quality-of-life instruments should be used together for the evaluation of patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 35, 288–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02201.x. PubMedCrossRef
Riemsma, R. P., Forbes, C. A., Glanville, J. M., Eastwood, A. J., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). General health status measures for people with cognitive impairment: Learning disability and acquired brain injury. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 5, 1–100.
Lobentanz, I. S., Asenbaum, S., Vass, K., Sauter, C., Klösch, G., Kollegger, H., et al. (2004). Factors influencing quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients: Disability, depressive mood, fatigue and sleep quality. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 110, 6–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00257.x. PubMedCrossRef
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fayers, P., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70–84.
Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22–S31. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04. PubMedCrossRef
Hill, C. D., Edwards, M. C., Thissen, D., Langer, M. M., Wirth, R. J., Burwinkle, T. M., et al. (2007). Practical issues in the application of item response theory: A demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales. Medical Care, 45, S39–S47. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000259879.05499.eb. PubMedCrossRef
Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 17–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025. PubMedCrossRef
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1179–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Leplege, A., Ecosse, E., Pouchot, J., Coste, J., & Perneger, T. (2001). MOS SF36 Questionnaire. Manual and Guidelines for Scores’ Interpretation. Paris: Editions Estem.
Cameletti, M., Caviezel, V., (2010). CMC: Cronbach-Mesbah Curve.
Muthén L., Muthén, B. (2012). MPlus user’s guide. 7th Ed. Muthén Muthén.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
Andersen, J., (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 32, 283–301.
Mair, P., Hatzinger, R., Extended rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT Models in R 2007. http://epub.wu.ac.at/332/ (accessed April 18, 2014).
Akaike, H. (1998). Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, & G. Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 199–213). New York: Springer. CrossRef
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item response theory to practical testing problems. Routledge.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 35(1), p. 139.
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A Handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
SPSS Inc. Released 2008. SPSS statistics for windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
R Core Team. R. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Marrie, R. A., Miller, D. M., Chelune, G. J., & Cohen, J. A. (2003). Validity and reliability of the MSQLI in cognitively impaired patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills Basingstoke England), 9, 621–626. CrossRef
Bullinger, M., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Leplège, A., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., et al. (1998). Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. International quality of life assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 913–923. PubMedCrossRef
Al-Tahan, A. M., Al-Jumah, M. A., Bohlega, S. M., Al-Shammari, S. N., Al-Sharoqi, I. A., Dahdaleh, M. P., et al. (2011). The importance of quality-of-life assessment in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis. Recommendations from the Middle East MS advisory group. Neurosciences (Riyadh Saudi Arab), 16, 109–113.
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376. PubMedCrossRef
Baumstarck, K., Butzkueven, H., Fernández, O., Flachenecker, P., Stecchi, S., Idiman, E., et al. (2013). Responsiveness of the multiple sclerosis international quality of life questionnaire to disability change: A longitudinal study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 127. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-127. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Ostini, R., Nering, M. L. (Eds.). (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
- Development of a cross-cultural item bank for measuring quality of life related to mental health in multiple sclerosis patients
- Springer International Publishing