Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Perceiving musical rhythms can be considered a process of attentional chunking over time, driven by accent patterns. A rhythmic structure can also be generated internally, by placing a subjective accent pattern on an isochronous stimulus train. Here, we investigate the event-related potential (ERP) signature of actual and subjective accents, thus disentangling low-level perceptual processes from the cognitive aspects of rhythm processing. The results show differences between accented and unaccented events, but also show that different types of unaccented events can be distinguished, revealing additional structure within the rhythmic pattern. This structure is further investigated by decomposing the ERP into subcomponents, using principal component analysis. In this way, the processes that are common for perceiving a pattern and self-generating it are isolated, and can be visualized for the tasks separately. The results suggest that top-down processes have a substantial role in the cerebral mechanisms of rhythm processing, independent of an externally presented stimulus.
Abecasis, D., Brochard, R., Granot, R., & Drake, C. (2005). Differential brain response to metrical accents in isochronous auditory sequences. Music Perception, 22(3), 549–562. CrossRef
Bolton, T. L. (1894). Rhythm. American Journal of Psychology, 6, 145–238. CrossRef
Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.
Brochard, R., Abecasis, D.,Potter, D., Ragot, R., & Drake, C. (2003). The “ticktock” of our internal clock: Direct brain evidence of subjective accents in isochronous sequences. Psychological Science 14(4), 362–366. CrossRef
Desain, P. (1992). A (de)composable theory of rhythm perception. Music Perception, 9(4), 439–454.
Desain P., & Honing, H. (1992) Music, Mind and Machine: Studies in Computer Music, Music Cognition and Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
Dien J., & Frishkoff, G. A. (2005). Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. In T. Handy (Eds.), Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Geiser, E., Ziegler, E., Jancke, L., & Meyer, M. (2009). Early electrophysiological correlates of meter and rhythm processing in music perception. Cortex, 45, 93–102.
Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ladinig, O., Honing, H., Háden, G., & Winkler, I. (2009). Probing attentive and preattentive emergent meter in adult listeners without extensive music training. Music Perception, 26(4), 377–386. CrossRef
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159. CrossRef
Large, E. W., & Kolen, J. F. (1995). Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Connection Science, 6, 177–208. CrossRef
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
London, J. (2004). Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Lee, C. S. (1984). The rhythmic interpretation of monophonic music. Music Perception, 1, 424–441.
Potter, D., Fenwick, M., Abecasis, D., & Brochard, R. (2009). Perceiving rhythm where none exists: Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of subjective accenting. Cortex, 45, 103–109.
- Decomposing rhythm processing: electroencephalography of perceived and self-imposed rhythmic patterns
Rebecca S. Schaefer
Rutger J. Vlek