Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1643-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) into Danish (SMFA-DK) and assess the psychometric properties.
SMFA was translated and cross-culturally adapted according to a standardized procedure. Minor changes in the wording in three items were made to adapt to Danish conditions. Acute patients (n = 201) and rehabilitation patients (n = 231) with musculoskeletal problems aged 18–87 years were included. The following analysis were made to evaluate psychometric quality of SMFA-DK: Reliability with Chronbach’s alpha, content validity as coding according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), floor/ceiling effects, construct validity as factor analysis, correlations between SMFA-DK and Short Form 36 and also known group method. Responsiveness and effect size were calculated.
Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.79 and 0.94. SMFA-DK captured all components of the ICF, and there were no floor/ceiling effects. Factor analysis demonstrated four subscales. SMFA-DK correlated good with the SF-36 subscales for the rehabilitation patients and lower for the newly injured patients. Effect sizes were excellent and better for SMFA-DK than for SF-36.
The study indicates that SMFA-DK can be a valid and responsive measure of outcome in rehabilitation settings.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 168 kb)11136_2017_1643_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
World Health Organization. (2013). How to use the ICF. A practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
Böhm, T. D., Kirschner, S., Köhler, M., Wollmerstedt, N., Walther, M., Matzer, M., et al. (2005). The German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire: Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and comparison with the Short Form 36 and constant score—A prospective evaluation of patients undergoing repair for rotator cuff tear. Rheumatology International,25(2), 86–93. CrossRefPubMed
Kirschner, S., Walther, M., Böhm, D., Matzer, M., Heesen, T., Faller, H., et al. (2003). German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): Comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology International,23(1), 15–20. PubMed
Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. World Health Organization. (2005). Retrieved June 26, 2010 from http://who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/print/.html
Bjoerner, J., Damsgaard, M., & Watt, T. (1998). Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. Journal Clinical Epidemiology,51(11), 1001–1011. CrossRef
Reininga, I. H. F., El Moumni, M., Bulstra, S. K., Olthof, M. G. L., Wendt, K. W., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-NL): Internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness. Injury,43(6), 726–733. CrossRefPubMed
Baker, S., Neill, B., & Haddon, W. (1974). The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care,14(3), 187–196. CrossRef
World Health Organization. ICF Browser.Retrieved September 2016 from http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/Accessed
Portney, L., & Watkins, M. (2009). Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Middel, B., & van Sonderen, E. (2002). Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. International Journal of Integrated Care,2, e15. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hedbeck, C. J., Tidermark, J., Ponzer, S., Blomfeldt, R., & Bergström, G. (2011). Responsiveness of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) in patients with femoral neck fractures. Quality of Life Research:an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation,20(4), 513–521. CrossRef
Martin, D. P., Engelberg, R., Agel, J., & Swiontkowski, M. F. (1997). Comparison of the musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume,79(9), 1323–1335. CrossRefPubMed
Van Son, M. A. C., Den Oudsten, B. L., Roukema, J. A., Gosens, T., Verhofstad, M. H. J., & De Vries, J. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire in patients with a fracture of the upper or lower extremity. Quality of Life Research,23(3), 917–926. CrossRefPubMed
Wang, Y., He, Z., Lei, L., Lin, D., Lin, Y., Wang, G., et al. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire in patients with skeletal muscle injury of the upper or lower extremities. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,7(16), 161. CrossRef
Brandt, D. E., Ho, P. S., Chan, L., & Rasch, E. K. (2014). Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Quality of Life Research,23(10), 2663s–2671s. CrossRef
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA)
- Springer International Publishing