Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

01-08-2012

Construction and international validation of CIVIQ-14 (a short form of CIVIQ-20), a new questionnaire with a stable factorial structure

Auteurs: R. Launois, J. G. Le Moine, F. S. Lozano, A. Mansilha

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2012

Abstract

Background

The factorial instability of the CIVIQ-20 social dimension in different populations has necessitated the development of a new stable questionnaire to interpret results from international studies.

Objective

Construction of a stable and psychometrically validated questionnaire from CIVIQ-20.

Methods and major findings

A prospective, international study was used to construct a stable CIVIQ scale and to validate its psychometric properties. An iterative process was implemented to eliminate the more unstable items (six), and the social and physical dimensions were combined. The resulting instrument comprised 14 items, split into three dimensions (pain, physical, and psychological), and was named CIVIQ-14. The stability of the CIVIQ-14 factorial structure was confirmed in Polish, Czech, Spanish, and French populations using principal component analysis and multitrait/multimethod analysis. Psychometric assessment demonstrated that CIVIQ-14 was reliable (intra-class coefficient >0.8; weighted kappa >0.8), valid (correlation coefficients between dimension scores and clinical severity scores between 0.3 and 0.6), and sensitive (effect sizes >0.6 for psychological dimension; >0.8 for the other dimensions).

Conclusion

CIVIQ-14 is a reliable, valid, and sensitive instrument applicable to international studies of patients with chronic venous disease.

vorige artikel Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change

volgende artikel Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in chronic pain patients

Vasquez, M. A., & Munschauer, C. E. (2008). Venous clinical severity score and quality of life assessment tools: Application to vein practice. Phlebology, 23, 259–275.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, J. J., Guest, M. G., Greenhalgh, R. M., & Davies, A. H. (2000). Measuring the quality of life in patients with venous ulcers. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 31(4), 642–649.PubMedCrossRef

Hareendran, A., Doll, H., Wild, D. J., Moffatt, C. J., Musgrove, E., Wheatley, C., et al. (2007). The venous leg ulcer quality of life (VLU-QoL) questionnaire: Development and psychometric validation. Wound Repair Regen, 15(4), 465–473.PubMedCrossRef

Garratt, A. M., Macdonald, L. M., Ruta, D. A., Russell, I. T., Buckingham, J. K., & Krukowski, Z. H. (1993). Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. Quality Health Care, 2(1), 5–10.CrossRef

Lamping, D. L., Schroter, S., Kurz, X., Kahn, S. R., & Abenhaim, L. (2003). Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: Development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 37(2), 410–419.PubMedCrossRef

Guex, J. J., Zimmet, S. E., Boussetta, S., Nguyen, C., & Taieb, C. (2007). Construction and validation of a patient-reported outcome dedicated to chronic venous disorders: SQOR-V (specific quality of life and outcome response - venous). Journal des Maladies Vasculaires, 32, 135–147.PubMedCrossRef

Launois, R., Reboul-Marty, J., & Henry, B. (1996). Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Quality of Life Research, 5, 539–554.PubMedCrossRef

Launois, R., Mansilha, A., & Jantet, G. (2010). International psychometric validation of the chronic venous disease quality of life questionnaire CIVIQ-20. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 40, 783–789.PubMedCrossRef

Padberg, F. (2003). Regarding “Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: Development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life”. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 37(4), 911–912.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Guidance for Industry. (2010). Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryinformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed Dec 2010.

11.

Jantet, G. (2002). Chronic venous insufficiency: worldwide results of the RELIEF study. Reflux assEssment and quaLity of lIfe improvEment with micronized Flavonoids. Angiology, 53, 245–256.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Launois, R. Data on file, REES France Paris.

13.

Chassany, O., Le-Jeunne, P., Duracinsky, M., Schwalm, M. S., & Mathieu, M. (2006). Discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes in chronic venous disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Value Health, 9, 39–46.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Localio, A. R., Berlin, J. A., Ten Have, T. R., & Kimmel, S. E. (2001). Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: An overview. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 112–123.PubMed

15.

Methods of Monte-Carlo and of Re-Sampling (Jack-Knife Bootstrap) [in French]. (2006). In G. Saporta (Ed.), Probabilités, analyse des données et statistique (2nd edn., pp. 371–386). Paris, France: Editions Technip.

16.

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P., & Patrick, D. L. (1991). Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clinical Trials, 12(4 Suppl), 142S–158S.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27–36.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Guyatt, G., Feeny, D., & Patrick, D. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118, 622–629.PubMed

20.

Norman, G. (1989). Issues in the use of change scores in randomised trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 1097–1105.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Biemans, A. A., van der Velden, S. K., Bruijninckx, C. M., Buth, J., & Nijsten, T. (2011). Validation of the chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire in Dutch patients treated for varicose veins. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. doi:10.1016/ejves.2011.04.007.

22.

Guyatt, G. H., Bombardier, C., & Tugwell, P. X. (1986). Measuring disease specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ, 134, 889–895.PubMed

23.

Alegre, P., Puskas, A., Giurcaneanu, C., Andercou, A., & Jantet, G. (2010). Absenteeism and impaired quality of life in chronic venous disease in patients in Romania. ISPOR 13th Annual European congress research abstracts. Value in Health, 13, A239–A250.

24.

Sarvananthan, T., Sheperd, A. C., & Davies, A. (2010). Who benefits the most from varicose vein intervention: Can we predict treatment outcomes? Phlebology, 25, 1–2.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Construction and international validation of CIVIQ-14 (a short form of CIVIQ-20), a new questionnaire with a stable factorial structure
Auteurs: R. Launois
J. G. Le Moine
F. S. Lozano
A. Mansilha
Publicatiedatum: 01-08-2012
Uitgeverij: Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0008-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods and major findings

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2012

Comparison of hypothetical and experienced EQ-5D valuations: relative weights of the five dimensions

Screen time and physical activity behaviours are associated with health-related quality of life in Australian adolescents

Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change

Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in chronic pain patients

Prof. Andrei A. Novik: 27th February, 1952 to 11th July, 2011

The associations among coping, nadir CD4+ T-cell count, and non-HIV-related variables with health-related quality of life among an ambulatory HIV-positive patient population