Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
IRB approval. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, which was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
The aim of this study was to create an Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I) and evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample with chronic low back pain.
The PCS was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric testing included factor analysis, reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest repeatability (intraclass coefficient correlations), and concurrent validity by comparing the PCS-I with a numerical rating scale (NRS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) (Pearson’s correlation).
It took 4 months to develop an agreed version of the PCS-I, which was satisfactorily administered to 180 subjects with chronic low back pain. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor 13-item solution (68% of explained variance). The questionnaire was internally consistent with one exception (α = 0.92 as a whole; 0.89 for Helplessness, 0.87 for Rumination and 0.56 for Magnification subscales) and showed a high degree of test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.842). Concurrent validity showed moderate correlations with the NRS (r = 0.44), TSK (r = 0.59), RMDQ (r = 0.45), HADS (Anxiety: r = 0.57; Depression r = 0.46) and PANAS (Negative Affect r = 0.54). The minimum detectable change was 10.45. The subscales were also psychometrically analysed.
The successfully translated Italian version of the PCS has good psychometric properties replicating those of other versions.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Pincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002). A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),27(5), E109–E120. CrossRef
Sullivan, M. J., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment,7, 524–532. CrossRef
García Campayo, J., Rodero, B., Alda, M., Sobradiel, N., Montero, J., & Moreno, S. (2008). Validation of the Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in fibromyalgia. Medicina Clínica (Barc),131(13), 487–492. CrossRef
Pallegama, R. W., Ariyawardana, S. P. A. G., Ranasinghe, A. W., Sitheeque, M. A. M., & Glaros, A. (2009). Validation of the Sinhala version of Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Proceedings of the Peradeniya University Research Sessions,14, 94–96.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),25, 3186–3189. CrossRef
Huskinson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet,2, 1127–1131. CrossRef
Monticone, M., Giorgi, I., Baiardi, P., Barbieri, M., Rocca, B., & Bonezzi, C. (2010). Development of the Italian version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK-I. Cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),35(12), 1241–1246.
Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. (1997). Comment on use of concordance correlation to assess the agreement between two variables. Biometrics,52, 775–777.
Terwee, C. B., Van der Slikke, R. M., Van Lummel, R. C., Benink, R. J., Meijers, W. G., & De Vet, H. C. (2006). Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,59, 724–731. PubMedCrossRef
- Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change
- Springer Netherlands