Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

07-02-2018 | Review

Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Auteurs: Valéria Baldassin, Helena Eri Shimizu, Emerson Fachin-Martins

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2018

Abstract

Study design

Systematic review.

Objective

The purpose of the study was to identify and organize evidence regarding quality of life influenced by assistive technology related to computers for people with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting

Distrito Federal, Brazil.

Methods

A search strategy was conducted on the PubMed, PEDro, LILACS, PsycINFO, and SCIELO. All types of study designs considering assistive technology to improve quality of life for individuals with SCI were included. After search strategy procedures, ten references were included to review. The methodologic quality of each study was evaluated using the Level of Evidence proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.

Results

Most of the studies showed that devices for computer access improve the quality of life of people with SCI, regardless of the level of injury and type of resource. However, the positive outcomes in the quality of life should be interpreted with caution, as several methodological limitations were observed in the articles.

Conclusions

Despite the scarcity of studies and their methodological limitations, there is evidence that assistive technology for computer access favors the quality of life of people with tetraplegia due to SCI, since it improves participation, independence, and self-esteem.

vorige artikel Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis

volgende artikel Quality of life at 6 years after occupational injury

Boakye, M., & Barbara, C. L. S. A. (2012). Quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury: Comparisons with other populations. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, 17(September), 29–37. CrossRefPubMed

Hill, M., Noonan, V., Sakakibara, B., & Miller, W. (2010). Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord, 48(6), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.164.Quality. CrossRefPubMed

Trgovcevic, S., Milicevic, M., Nedovic, G., & Jovanic, G. (2014). Health condition and quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 43(9), 1229–1238. PubMedPubMedCentral

Barker, R. N., Kendall, M. D., Amsters, D. I., Pershouse, K. J., Haines, T. P., & Kuipers, P. (2009). The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 47(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.82. CrossRefPubMed

Van Leeuwen, C. M. C., Post, M. W. M., Van Der Woude, L. H. V., et al. (2012). Changes in life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury during and after inpatient rehabilitation: Adaptation or measurement bias? Quality of Life Research, 21(9), 1499–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136011-0073-7. CrossRefPubMed

The WHOQOL Group (1995) The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409. CrossRef

Fleck, M., Louzada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., & Santos, L. (2000). Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-bref. Rev Saude Publica, 34(2), 178–183. CrossRefPubMed

Scherer, M. J., & Cushman, L. A. (2000) Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries. Psychological Reports, 87(3), 981–987. CrossRefPubMed

Folan, A., Barclay, L., Cooper, C., & Robinson, M. (2013). Exploring the experience of clients with tetraplegia utilizing assistive technology for computer access. Disability and Rehabilitation, 10(1), 46–52. CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cooper, R., & Cooper, R. (2010). Quality-of-life technology for people with spinal cord injuries. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.004. PubMed

11.

Andrade, L., Araújo, E., Andrade, K., Soares, D., & Cianca, T. (2010). Role of nursing in physical rehabilitation. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 63(6), 1056–1060. CrossRefPubMed

12.

McKinley, W., Tewksbury, M., Sitter, P., Reed, J., & Floyd, S. (2004). Assistive technology and computer adaptations for individuals with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 19(2), 141–146. PubMed

13.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. CrossRef

14.

OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/. Published 2011. Accessed 26 April 2017.

15.

Rigby, P., Ryan, S. E., & Campbell, K. A. (2011). Electronic aids to daily living and quality of life for persons with tetraplegia. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 6(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.522678. CrossRefPubMed

16.

Rigby, P., Ryan, S., Joos, S., Cooper, B., Jutai, J., & Steggles, E. (2005). Impact of electronic aids to daily living on the lives of persons with cervical spinal cord injuries. Assistive Technology, 17(2), 89–97. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Scherer, M., & Cushman, L. (2001) Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation 23(9), 387–393. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11394589.

18.

Collinger, J., Boninger, M., Bruns, T., Kenneth, C., Wang, W., & Weber, D. (2013). Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 50(2), 145–160. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Ripat, J. D., & Woodgate, R. L. (2012). The role of assistive technology in self-perceived participation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 35(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283531806. CrossRefPubMed

20.

Verdonck, M., Chard, G., & Nolan, M. (2011). Electronic aids to daily living: Be able to do what you want. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.525291. CrossRefPubMed

21.

Craig, A., Tran, Y., McIsaac, P., & Boord, P. (2005) The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled. Medical Science Monitor 11(1):RA32–RA39. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15614204.

22.

Des Jarlais, D., Lyles, C., & Crepaz, N. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00785.x. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Tsai, T.-H., Nash, R. J., & Tseng, K. C. (2009). A five-layer users’ need hierarchy of computer input device selection: A contextual observation survey of computer users with cervical spinal injuries (CSI). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(3), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100802543312. CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hammell, K. W. (2004). Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: A review and critique. Spinal Cord, 42(9), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101636. CrossRefPubMed

25.

Geyh, S., Fellinghauer, B. A. G., Kirchberger, I., & Post, M. W. M. (2010). Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-94. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Alves, A. C. J., Matsukura, T. S., & Scherer, M. J. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation of the assistive technology device—Predisposition assessment (ATD PA) for use in Brazil (ATD PA Br). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(2), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1233294. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review
Auteurs: Valéria Baldassin
Helena Eri Shimizu
Emerson Fachin-Martins
Publicatiedatum: 07-02-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Study design

Objective

Setting

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2018

Factors affecting the quality of life before and after surgery in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Prospective associations of social isolation and loneliness with poor sleep quality in older adults

Association between social support and health-related quality of life among Chinese rural elders in nursing homes: the mediating role of resilience

Evaluating cognition in individuals with Huntington disease: Neuro-QoL cognitive functioning measures

Bias in retrospective assessment of perceived dental treatment effects when using the Oral Health Impact Profile

Quality of life after hip, vertebral, and distal forearm fragility fractures measured using the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, and time-trade-off: results from the ICUROS