Biopsychosocial factors of quality of life in individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a scoping review

The articles were identified from the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO, with the search conducted on 24 April 2021. With the help of a subject-area expert librarian, the initial database search was developed using key search terms: ‘brain injuries,’ ‘quality of life,’ and ‘life quality.’ Boolean terms (‘AND,’ ‘OR,’ ‘NOT’) were used to combine terms, and asterisks were used to include variants in spelling.

English peer-reviewed articles published since 1990 to the date of search were reviewed to limit the breadth of articles obtained and to analyze more recent QOL literature. Full-text articles were selected if they had: (1) presented data on half or more participants with a moderate to severe TBI who were 18 years or older, (2) identified biological, psychological, or social QOL factors, and (3) provided quantitative data on a validated global QOL measure. Adolescents or children with TBI were not included as there may be developmental causes affecting their QOL, which may not be present in the adult population. Furthermore, the exclusion criteria consisted of articles with no full-texts available (i.e., conference abstracts, poster, dissertations) or study designs such as case studies or qualitative methodologies. Articles with surgical (e.g., cranioplasty) or hormone-related interventions (e.g., pituitary dysfunction) were also excluded.

The study selection and information extraction were performed using the software Covidence [17]. All authors were involved in each stage of the review process, with additional help of four research assistants. Authors RM, JG, JNG, and two research assistants independently performed the title and abstract screening, while authors RM, JNG, and JS independently conducted the full-text screening. Conflicts were resolved by JS. Data extraction was independently conducted by RM, JG, and two research assistants. In line with the aims of this scoping review, a critical appraisal was not conducted. Extracted data included the country of the study, authors, participant information, measures of QOL, factors associated with QOL, and other main findings (Tables 1, 2).

There were 28 studies that reported 19 biological QOL factors, such as sex, TBI severity, cognition, age, time since injury, mobility, functional independence, length of hospital stay, length of ICU treatment, pre-injury comorbidities, thoracic injury, trauma, epilepsy, fatigue, sleep disturbance, symptom severity, identifying emotions, global function, and duration of posttraumatic amnesia.

There were seven studies that reported on sex and QOL after TBI [19‐25]. Most studies found that females reported lower HRQOL than males [19‐23]. However, two studies reported contrasting findings, where being male was associated with lower QOL [24, 25]. One study identified that males had lower scores than females on all HRQOL domains, except for the domains of role-emotional and mental health [24], while another study reported that females had higher self-rated QOL [25].

A person’s age was another biological QOL factor after TBI, with differing results [23, 26‐32]. Van Delft-Schreurs et al. [30] found that higher QOL in the environmental domain was associated with older age, while Tsaousides et al., [29] identified a positive correlation between the age at injury and QOL. In contrast, one study noted that older women reported worse QOL [23], and a separate study reported that participants aged 31 and above, had decreased scores in the role-physical domain of QOL [28]. However, the relationship of age and QOL varies across the lifespan and could explain the discrepant findings looking for linear correlations or associations.

The severity of a TBI was a common QOL factor, as illustrated by six studies [21, 28, 29, 32‐34]. Mixed findings were described, with two studies associating higher severity of injury with better QOL [28, 34], while one study reported high severity of injury with low QOL [29]. A separate study identified that higher severity of TBI was associated with lower scores on the physical functioning domain, but higher scores on general health and role-physical domains [21]. Additionally, one study found TBI severity to be a predictor for mental HRQOL [32], while another study found a weak correlation between TBI severity and HRQOL [33].

There were six studies that described how cognition affected QOL [27, 35‐39]. Except for one study, higher scores on neuropsychological tests were associated with higher QOL. Cognition was a direct predictor of QOL [27], and people with cognitive impairments, such as deficits in attention, memory, and executive functioning reported lower QOL scores [35‐37, 39]. However, a case–control study reported that those with lower executive functioning had high scores in the social relationship QOL domain [38].

There were a few factors that were identified once or by only a small number of studies. The factors reported only once included sleep disturbance, pre-injury comorbidity, longer periods of posttraumatic amnesia, epilepsy, fatigue, mobility problems, symptom severity, lower global function, thoracic injuries, and longer length of ICU treatment [19, 22, 30, 36, 40‐43]. These factors impacted QOL negatively, except for thoracic injuries, which were associated with better QOL in the environmental domain. Time since injury, functional independence, identifying emotions, and longer hospital stay were identified by a few studies. Time since injury was a predictor of QOL [32, 44], while two other studies reported that as time since injury increased, so did QOL [22, 24]. There were mixed findings for identifying emotions, with one study reporting poorer QOL for those who had difficulties [45], while another study noted lower QOL for those who had better facial affect recognition [46]. Functional independence was also identified as a factor, with three studies showing associations with physical HRQOL [28, 32, 39]. Finally, longer hospitalization reported decreased QOL and was a predictor for physical functioning [30, 32, 39].

There were 31 studies that reported 16 psychological QOL factors, these included depression, anxiety, other psychiatric disorders, self-efficacy, coping styles, optimistic life orientation, positive affect, positive changes, positive views of self, self-awareness, posttraumatic stress, somatic impairments, motivation, health locus of control, suicide ideation, and self-appraisal.

Mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and other psychiatric disorders, lowered QOL as identified by 18 studies. Depression was the most common mental health disorder, as depression was associated with lower QOL [27, 42, 44, 47, 48] with low scores in almost all the HRQOL subscales [19, 28, 36, 49, 50] and negative correlations with QOL [35, 51]. Additionally, a prospective longitudinal study found that individuals with no depression had higher QOL than those with late onset or chronic depression, and similar scores to those who had resolved depression [52]. Anxiety was assessed along with depression, and individuals with these disorders portrayed low QOL [33, 39, 42, 47]. Similar findings were noted for other psychiatric disorders, such as substance use, eating disorders, and personality changes [32, 47, 50, 53].

Coping styles and self-efficacy were psychological QOL factors identified in this review, which described how an individual with TBI approaches difficulties and attains goals. A case–control study reported that individuals with TBI used task-oriented coping styles less often than controls; however, individuals with this type of coping style reported higher QOL [54]. Three studies highlighted non-productive or avoidance strategies after TBI, with individuals portraying lower QOL [31, 55, 56] and one study portraying negative correlations with all domains of HRQOL [55]. Self-efficacy was reported to correlate positively with QOL by two studies [29, 41]. However, in one study, while general and employment-related self-efficacy were positively correlated with perceived QOL, there was a negative correlation with a global QOL measure [29].

Individuals who experienced optimistic life orientation, positive affect, changes, and views of self had higher QOL after TBI, while those with posttraumatic stress had lower QOL [28, 51, 54, 57‐60]. Viewing life with optimism post-injury was positively correlated with all HRQOL domains [54]. Additionally, experiencing positive emotions, changes, and views of self in life post-injury also facilitated QOL [28, 51, 57, 58]. Participants with posttraumatic stress had lower QOL than individuals with no posttraumatic stress [59]. Furthermore, mental HRQOL was negatively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms after TBI [60].

Other psychological factors that were identified in this review include self-awareness, somatic impairments, motivation, self-appraisal, and suicide ideation. With regard to self-awareness, as an individual’s awareness increased, QOL decreased [38, 48]. Somatic impairments, motivation, self-appraisal, and suicide ideation were identified once by the studies in this review. Somatic impairments and self-appraisal were predictors of QOL, while low motivation and thoughts about suicide portrayed low QOL [24, 27, 35, 61].

There were 31 studies consisting of 19 social factors that affected QOL, these included employment, income, work discrepancy, productive activities, work adjustment, education, community integration, social participation, social support, marital status, friendships, living with others, intimate relationships, social isolation, discharge destination, transition success, pre-injury sick leave, relatives interpersonal functioning, and environmental setting.

Employment was the most common social factor, with 10 studies stating that individuals who were employed had higher QOL [19, 21, 22, 28‐30, 34, 42, 53, 62]. Individuals with pre-injury employment had higher scores in all HRQOL domains [28], and it was also a predictor for higher HRQOL [22, 42, 53]. Income, work discrepancy, engagement in productive activities, work adjustment, and education were identified as other vocational-related social factors. Income correlated and was a predictor of high QOL after TBI [29, 34], while reduced work discrepancy (e.g., how work needs are met related to perceived importance of work) was associated with low QOL [34]. Productive activities, defined as work or study programs, were another predictor of QOL [24, 63], while work adjustment correlated with QOL [31]. Individuals with more education reported better QOL [21, 25, 28, 31, 37], with some studies noting an increase in specific QOL domains such as the physical functioning [21, 28] and environmental domain [37].

Community integration and social participation increased QOL. A retrospective longitudinal study identified that more community integration and fewer activity limitations, increased QOL [64], while a cross-sectional study found that those with community integration had higher HRQOL in almost all domains [28]. Additionally, community integration was stated as a predictor for QOL [20, 57]. Social participation had a positive impact on QOL [26, 65], with one study showing that participants who socially participated in more activities with others reported high QOL [26].

Individuals who had social support, friendships, and were married had higher QOL, hence, indicating the importance of having connections after TBI. There were 7 studies that portrayed individuals with high social support reported better QOL [25, 31, 41, 54, 57, 63, 66]. Two studies noted that satisfaction of social support correlated with higher QOL [31, 54], while another study identified positive appraisals in seeking support as a predictor of high QOL [63]. A larger number of friends were a predictor for QOL [67], while losing friendships reported a low QOL score [68]. Being married and living with other individuals was highlighted by three studies in increasing QOL [24, 25, 30]. Additionally, participants who reported a low QOL were more socially isolated and had fewer intimate relationships [68].

There were six additional social factors reported, such as discharge destination, transition success, pre-injury sick leave, relatives interpersonal functioning, and environmental setting. Home discharges compared to nursing home discharges was associated with greater QOL, and increased transition success from hospital to home was correlated with higher QOL [32, 39, 69]. A history of pre-injury sick leave predicted worse QOL, relatives interpersonal functioning was associated with mental and physical HRQOL, and rural settings were a predictor for high QOL [53, 63, 70].

Many studies identified sex as a biological factor of QOL [19‐25]. However, in these studies, the sex of the participant (e.g., male, female) was reported as ‘gender.’ As we now understand gender to be a sociocultural construct [71], for this review, we have used the term sex (biological) instead. Majority of the studies indicated that females reported lower QOL [19‐23], while a few identified that being male was linked to low QOL [24, 25]. Females are reported to have shorter hospital stays and receive less intensive care and rehabilitation after their TBI [72]. As such, females may be at risk for poorer long-term outcomes, and hence, experience a negative impact on their QOL. Sex was also the only biological factor that affected the same QOL domain in multiple studies. In four studies, females reported low QOL on the mental health domains of their QOL outcome measures. Previous literature shows that women with TBI are likely to experience more depressive symptoms than men or those without the injury [73‐75]. Gender roles can contribute to this, as gender or power imbalances may be amplified post-injury [76, 77]. For example, if a woman occupies the role of a caregiver in their household, they may be expected to retain these duties and receive minimum assistance from others. This disparity showcases the need for support and help for women to reformulate their roles and characteristics post-injury [78].

TBI severity was a biological factor that reported mixed findings in this review. For some studies in our review, higher TBI severity was associated with higher QOL [28, 34]. Literature has noted the paradox of high severity of injury associated with better QOL, indicating that reduced awareness of injury-related deficits may be a causal factor for higher QOL [79, 80]. This also aligns with another finding from this review, as two other studies associated high self-awareness with low QOL [38, 48]. Indeed, as an individual’s self-awareness improves, the realization of deficits and consequent changes in function are more apparent, thereby decreasing their perceived QOL. There was one study that reported increasing severity resulted in lower QOL, which could be indicative of the physical and cognitive problems from a TBI [29]. However, it must be noted that the studies reporting on injury severity and QOL have most likely excluded individuals who are not able to self-report. As QOL measures are self-reported, individuals who have severe injuries from their TBI may not have the capacity to complete a QOL measure and hence, may be excluded from the study sample.

Cognitive impairment, such as deficits in attention, memory, and executive functioning, were identified as a factor that lowered QOL [27, 35‐37, 39]. This review highlights the extent in which cognitive impairments impede everyday functions as various QOL domains (e.g., environmental, psychosocial) were impacted. For example, Gorgoraptis et al. [36] reported that the physical functioning, social and emotional role functioning, and mental health domains were all affected. Additionally, poor cognition is often associated with comorbidities such as sleep disorders which also lower QOL [81, 82], as highlighted in this review [36]. As such, these findings add to the literature that state the importance of improving cognition in rehabilitation and the need for effective interventions [83‐85].

Fatigue, among others, were identified only once by studies in this review, indicating a gap in the research on these biological factors. Fatigue is a complex symptom with debilitating effects that is often difficult to measure objectively. Approximately up to 80% of individuals after a TBI experience fatigue [86], and it is also common in various chronic populations such as multiple sclerosis and stroke [87, 88]. While research on fatigue in the TBI population has been conducted through reviews and intervention outcomes, there is still much to explore about post-TBI fatigue and QOL.

The most common psychological factor identified was mental health disorders, with depression, anxiety, and other psychiatric disorders, with individuals reporting low QOL [19, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35, 36, 39, 42, 44, 47‐53]. The risk of depression after a TBI is doubled compared to a non-TBI population [75]. The symptoms of depression after a TBI are pervasive, as in this review, most studies reported low scores in all QOL domains. This aligns with other findings in populations such as multiple sclerosis [89], cancer [90], and Parkinsons [91]. Depression is associated with poor health and social outcomes such as a decrease in social activity, occupational function, and relationship status [92, 93], and as such, these findings highlight the importance of long-term support systems and screenings that need to be available for individuals with TBI [94].

Studies in this review have identified that active or task-oriented coping strategies, such as cognitive behavior strategies, facilitates high QOL, when compared to maladaptive strategies (i.e., avoidance, trivialization) [31, 54‐56]. Using coping styles that are characterized by actively working on problems have indicated positive associations with emotional adjustment and positive affect post-injury [95, 96]. Using problem-solving oriented coping styles were reported to correlate with the socially related domains in this review [54, 55]. This indicates that by developing strategies and actively working on ways to manage stressful situations, individuals may find it easier to resume their social interactions [97], and hence increase their QOL.

It was surprising that only two studies explored the effects of self-awareness on QOL [38, 48], given that up to 97% of individuals with moderate to severe TBI experience some degree of impaired self-awareness [98]. Furthermore, both studies reported varying results for different QOL domains, portraying the need for more research to enhance knowledge on the effects of self-awareness on QOL. Assessing self-awareness is an essential step in TBI rehabilitation, as those with impaired self-awareness can fail to recognize their lack of capabilities [99]. This can create challenges when trying to resume meaningful roles or participate in everyday activities, both factors which can affect QOL [25].

The most common social factor identified in this review was employment, with individuals who were employed having higher QOL [19, 21, 22, 28‐30, 34, 42, 53, 62]. Most studies reported high scores in the physical functioning QOL domain, indicating that physical performance is a necessary factor for vocational outcomes. Notably, while returning to work is an important goal in rehabilitation [100], a longitudinal study stated that only 44% of individuals with a moderate to severe TBI return to work after 3 years post-injury due to cognitive and physical difficulties [101]. This can have a negative impact on an individual’s QOL as being employed improves many psychosocial outcomes such as self-esteem and financial independence [102, 103]. Furthermore, higher income is associated with greater QOL, as reported by this review [29, 34]. Individuals can face more expenses post-injury, such as medical costs [104]. Direct medical costs for individuals with TBI are on average $4906 higher than the medical costs for individuals with non-head injuries [105]. Earning a higher income may help these individuals manage any financial challenges and reduce finance-related stressors.

This review identified social factors of community integration, participation, and support as prominent QOL contributors. After a TBI, a ‘gap’ may be identified in activities that are more physically and cognitively challenging (e.g., return to work, playing sports) [106]. Community integration and social participation are essential after a TBI, as it facilitates the participation in new and meaningful activities, building connections, and creating new life roles [107], all of which can help improve QOL. Social support can be important in facilitating participation and also increased QOL, as highlighted in this review [25, 31, 41, 54, 57, 63, 66]. Receiving support from brain injury communities, rehabilitation programs, family, and friends provides help to navigate the new and unexpected experiences that can arise post-injury [108]. However, findings from our present review and other literature, notes that these social supports often decrease overtime, emphasizing the need for long-term supports [31, 66, 109, 110].

Transition success and discharge destination were among two social factors that were reported only a few times [32, 39, 69]. The transition post-injury from hospital to home is complex as it involves the re-integration into pre-injury settings with the added challenges that stem from a TBI (e.g., cognition, greater dependence on others). There is a need for more research about the transition phase, as increased levels of depression and stress may be experienced as individuals start to adapt to life after injury [111]. While Wielenga-Bolten et al. reported that not being discharged to a nursing home was associated with total higher HRQOL [39], individuals with moderate to severe TBI may benefit from interdisciplinary in-patient rehabilitation instead [112]. Since substantial care may be needed after a moderate to severe TBI, discharge to home may mean reduced facilities for the individual post-injury or increased caregiver burden for family members [113]. More research on understanding the meaning and lived experiences of the transition phase and being discharged to non-home settings can help identify the barriers to QOL.

This study had three main limitations. First, as the definition and scope of QOL are vast, there were a large volume of articles obtained in this review, and this may have impacted the rigor and specificity of our review. While we provided a broad account of the data and encompassed all literature relating to this broad construct of QOL, a detailed overview of the changes in different QOL domains have not been reported. Second, our search included only published literature, as gray literature was not explored. As such, relevant articles and theses may have been excluded and limited the depth of findings. Last, this review only included articles published in English and may have limited findings to English-speaking areas of the world. As factors relating to QOL may vary in non-English-speaking countries, excluding articles published in other languages may have limited the scope of the findings.