Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

11-12-2015 | Uitgave 6/2016

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6/2016

Age and Social Context Modulate the Effect of Anxiety on Risk-taking in Pediatric Samples

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology > Uitgave 6/2016
Auteurs:
Dana Rosen, Nilam Patel, Nevia Pavletic, Christian Grillon, Daniel S. Pine, Monique Ernst
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s10802-015-0098-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Although risk-taking has been studied from a developmental perspective, no study has examined how anxiety, age, risk-valence and social context interact to modulate decision-making in youths. This study probes this question using a risk-taking task, the Stunt Task, in clinically anxious children (n = 17, 10 F, age = 8.3–12.1 years), healthy children (n = 13, 4 F, age = 9.3–12.2 years), clinically anxious adolescents (n = 18, 6 F, age = 12.3–17.7 years), and healthy adolescents (n =14, 10 F, age = 12.5–17.3 years). Social context was manipulated: in one condition, participants were led to believe that a group of peers were observing and judging their performance (peer-judge), while, in the other condition, they were led to believe that peers were not observing them (control). Only anxious children showed an influence of social context on their risk-taking behavior. Specifically, anxious children bet significantly less and had slower reaction times (RT) during the peer-judge than control condition. However, across social conditions, risk-valence modulated RT differently in function of age and diagnosis. Anxious children were slower on the positive-valence risky trial, whereas anxious adolescents were slower on the negative-valence risky trials relative to their respective healthy peers. In conclusion, clinically anxious children were the only group that was sensitive (risk-averse) to the effect of a negative peer-judge context. The negative peer-judge context did not affect risky decision-making in adolescents, whether they were anxious or healthy. Future work using a stronger aversive social context might be more effective at influencing risky behavior in this age group.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Extra materiaal
ESM 1 (DOCX 1760 kb)
10802_2015_98_MOESM1_ESM.docx
ESM 2 (DOCX 31 kb)
10802_2015_98_MOESM2_ESM.docx
ESM 3 (DOCX 15 kb)
10802_2015_98_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2016

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6/2016 Naar de uitgave