Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

11-11-2019

Affective and Cognitive Correlates of the Frequency of Using the Verb “to be”: An Empirical Test of E-Prime Theory

Auteurs: Horea-Radu Oltean, Daniel Ovidiu David

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy | Uitgave 2/2020

Abstract

The current study aimed to be an empirical test of E-Prime theory regarding its alleged positive effects of eliminating the verb “to be” from speech. Therefore, we investigated the intensity and the direction of the association between the frequency of using the verb “to be” and various psychological outcomes, namely general rational and irrational beliefs, negative functional and dysfunctional emotions, the functionality of inferences, and general psychological distress. 197 participants completed measures of investigated variables. Multiple Pearson product-moment correlations were used to test our hypothesis within a cross-sectional design. The frequency of using the verb “to be” was significantly negatively associated with levels of general rational beliefs, r = − .211, p = .021, and also with levels of preference beliefs, r = − .251, p = .003. This study provides first evidence in favor of E-Prime’s assumption that a less frequent use of the verb “to be” can lead to a less rigid and non-judgmental style of thinking. The elimination of the verb “to be” from speech may prevent dogmatic or rigid thinking, thus stimulating flexibility, and in turn determine the increase of rational beliefs levels, especially the levels of preference beliefs. Possible clinical and scientific implications are discussed.

vorige artikel The Factor Structure of the Attitudes and Beliefs Scale 2: Implications for Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

volgende artikel How Can Stoic Philosophy Inspire Psychosocial Genetic Counseling Practice? An Introduction and Exploration

Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.

Bond, F. W., & Dryden, W. (2000). How rational beliefs and irrational beliefs affect people’s inferences: An experimental investigation. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(1), 33–43.

Bond, F. W., Dryden, W., & Briscoe, R. (1999). Testing two mechanisms by which rational and irrational beliefs may affect the functionality of inferences. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72(Pt 4), 557–566. PubMed

Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62–65. PubMed

Bourland, D. (1965). A linguistic note: Writing in E-Prime. General Semantics Bulletin, 32/33, 111–114.

Bourland, D. D. (2004). To be or not to be: E-Prime as a tool for critical thinking. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 61(4), 546–557.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546.

David, D. (2013). E-Prime/R-Prime and emotion regulation in the context of the binary model of distress: An experimental investigation based on the general semantics framework. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13(1), 1–11.

David, D. (2015). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). In R. L. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp077.

David, D., & Cramer, D. (2009). Rational and irrational beliefs in human feelings and psychophysiology. Rational and Irrational Beliefs. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195182231.003.0006.

David, D., Montgomery, G. H., Macavei, B., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2005). An empirical investigation of Albert Ellis’s binary model of distress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20058. PubMed

DiGiuseppe, R., Leaf, R., Exner, T., & Robin, M. W. (1988). The development of a measure of irrational/rational thinking. World Congress of Behavior Therapy, Edinburgh, Scotland.

DiGiuseppe, R. A., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive behavior therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edwards, T., & Holtzman, N. S. (2017). A meta-analysis of correlations between depression and first person singular pronoun use. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.005.

Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Oxford, England: Lyle Stuart.

Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Revised and Updated. Secaucus: Carol Publishing Group.

Ellis, A. (2007). General semantics and rational-emotive therapy: 1991 Alfred Korzybski Memorial Lecture. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 64(4), 301–319.

Gaetano, J. (2013). Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction: An EXCEL calculator—Ver. 1.2. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3920.0481.

Haynes, W. (2013). Holm’s method. In W. Dubitzky, O. Wolkenhauer, K.-H. Cho, & H. Yokota (Eds.), Encyclopedia of systems biology (p. 902). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1214.

Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.

Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., Adamson, G., & Boduszek, D. (2014). Modeling the structure of the Attitudes and Belief Scale 2 using CFA and Bifactor approaches: Toward the development of an abbreviated version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43(1), 60–71. PubMed

Kellogg, E. W., & Bourland, D. D. (1990). Working with E-Prime: Some practical notes. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 47, 376–392.

Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of GS.

Masgoret, A.-M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta–analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and Associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00212.

Menefee, E. (1991). E-prime or E-choice. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 48, 136–140.

Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x. PubMed

Oltean, H. R., & David, D. O. (2015). The effects of using E-Prime/R-Prime language on emotional level in the context of the binary model of distress. Presented at the AREBT Annual Conference, London, UK.

Oltean, H.-R., & David, D. O. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relationship between rational beliefs and psychological distress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22562. PubMed

Oltean, H.-R., Hyland, P., Vallières, F., & David, D. O. (2017). An empirical assessment of REBT models of psychopathology and psychological health in the prediction of anxiety and depression symptoms. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465817000133. PubMed

Opris, D., & Macavei, B. (2007). The profile of emotional distress; norms for the Romanian population. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 7(2), 139–158.

Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(68)90028-4. PubMed

Vîslă, A., Flückiger, C., Grosse Holtforth, M., & David, D. (2016). Irrational beliefs and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441231. PubMed

Walen, S. R., DiGiuseppe, R., & Dryden, W. (1992). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2015). Language may indeed influence thought. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01631. PubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Affective and Cognitive Correlates of the Frequency of Using the Verb “to be”: An Empirical Test of E-Prime Theory
Auteurs: Horea-Radu Oltean
Daniel Ovidiu David
Publicatiedatum: 11-11-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy / Uitgave 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0894-9085
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6563
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-019-00329-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2020

Rational Emotive Family Health Therapy for Reducing Parenting Stress in Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Group Randomized Control Study

Targeting Trauma-Related Beliefs in PTSD with Behavioral Experiments: Illustrative Case Study

Concepts of Metacognition in the Treatment of Patients with Mental Disorders

Gender Differences in the Organizational Structure of the Rational/Irrational Beliefs in Depressive Symptoms

Academic Procrastination, School Attachment, and Life Satisfaction: A Mediation Model

The Factor Structure of the Attitudes and Beliefs Scale 2: Implications for Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy