Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The current study aimed to be an empirical test of E-Prime theory regarding its alleged positive effects of eliminating the verb “to be” from speech. Therefore, we investigated the intensity and the direction of the association between the frequency of using the verb “to be” and various psychological outcomes, namely general rational and irrational beliefs, negative functional and dysfunctional emotions, the functionality of inferences, and general psychological distress. 197 participants completed measures of investigated variables. Multiple Pearson product-moment correlations were used to test our hypothesis within a cross-sectional design. The frequency of using the verb “to be” was significantly negatively associated with levels of general rational beliefs, r = − .211, p = .021, and also with levels of preference beliefs, r = − .251, p = .003. This study provides first evidence in favor of E-Prime’s assumption that a less frequent use of the verb “to be” can lead to a less rigid and non-judgmental style of thinking. The elimination of the verb “to be” from speech may prevent dogmatic or rigid thinking, thus stimulating flexibility, and in turn determine the increase of rational beliefs levels, especially the levels of preference beliefs. Possible clinical and scientific implications are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.
Bond, F. W., & Dryden, W. (2000). How rational beliefs and irrational beliefs affect people’s inferences: An experimental investigation. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(1), 33–43. CrossRef
Bourland, D. (1965). A linguistic note: Writing in E-Prime. General Semantics Bulletin, 32/33, 111–114.
Bourland, D. D. (2004). To be or not to be: E-Prime as a tool for critical thinking. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 61(4), 546–557.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
David, D. (2013). E-Prime/R-Prime and emotion regulation in the context of the binary model of distress: An experimental investigation based on the general semantics framework. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13(1), 1–11.
David, D. (2015). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). In R. L. Cautin & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp077.
David, D., & Cramer, D. (2009). Rational and irrational beliefs in human feelings and psychophysiology. Rational and Irrational Beliefs. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195182231.003.0006. CrossRef
DiGiuseppe, R., Leaf, R., Exner, T., & Robin, M. W. (1988). The development of a measure of irrational/rational thinking. World Congress of Behavior Therapy, Edinburgh, Scotland.
DiGiuseppe, R. A., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive behavior therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, T., & Holtzman, N. S. (2017). A meta-analysis of correlations between depression and first person singular pronoun use. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.005. CrossRef
Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Oxford, England: Lyle Stuart.
Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Revised and Updated. Secaucus: Carol Publishing Group.
Ellis, A. (2007). General semantics and rational-emotive therapy: 1991 Alfred Korzybski Memorial Lecture. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 64(4), 301–319.
Gaetano, J. (2013). Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction: An EXCEL calculator—Ver. 1.2. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3920.0481.
Haynes, W. (2013). Holm’s method. In W. Dubitzky, O. Wolkenhauer, K.-H. Cho, & H. Yokota (Eds.), Encyclopedia of systems biology (p. 902). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1214. CrossRef
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
Kellogg, E. W., & Bourland, D. D. (1990). Working with E-Prime: Some practical notes. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 47, 376–392.
Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of GS.
Menefee, E. (1991). E-prime or E-choice. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 48, 136–140.
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x. PubMedCrossRef
Oltean, H. R., & David, D. O. (2015). The effects of using E-Prime/R-Prime language on emotional level in the context of the binary model of distress. Presented at the AREBT Annual Conference, London, UK.
Oltean, H.-R., Hyland, P., Vallières, F., & David, D. O. (2017). An empirical assessment of REBT models of psychopathology and psychological health in the prediction of anxiety and depression symptoms. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465817000133. PubMedCrossRef
Opris, D., & Macavei, B. (2007). The profile of emotional distress; norms for the Romanian population. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 7(2), 139–158.
Walen, S. R., DiGiuseppe, R., & Dryden, W. (1992). A practitioner’s guide to rational-emotive therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Affective and Cognitive Correlates of the Frequency of Using the Verb “to be”: An Empirical Test of E-Prime Theory
Daniel Ovidiu David
- Springer US
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Print ISSN: 0894-9085
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6563