Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The ICECAP-A is a simple measure of capability well-being for use with the adult population. The descriptive system is made up of five key attributes: Stability, Attachment, Autonomy, Achievement and Enjoyment. Studies have begun to assess the psychometric properties of the measure, including the construct and content validity and feasibility for use. This is the first study to use longitudinal data to assess the responsiveness of the measure.
This responsiveness study was completed alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for older adults with knee pain attributable to osteoarthritis. Anchor-based methodologies were used to explore the relationship between change over time in ICECAP-A score (the target measure) and change over time in another measure (the anchor). Analyses were completed using the non-value-weighted and value-weighted ICECAP-A scores. The EQ-5D-3L was used as a comparator measure to contextualise change in the ICECAP-A. Effect sizes, standardised response means and t tests were used to quantify responsiveness.
Small changes in the ICECAP-A scores were seen in response to underlying changes in patients’ health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression. Non-weighted scores were slightly more responsive than value-weighted scores. ICECAP-A change was of comparable size to change in the EQ-5D-3L reference measure.
This first analysis of the responsiveness using longitudinal data provides some positive evidence for the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A measure. There is a need for further research in those with low health and capability, and experiencing larger underlying changes in quality of life.
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In A. Sen (Ed.), Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Anand, P., et al. (2009). The development of capability indicators. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1), 125–152. CrossRef
Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16, 236–247. CrossRef
Burchardt, T. (2004). Capabilities and disability: The capabilities framework and the social model of disability. Disability and Society, 19(7), 735–751. CrossRef
Al-Janabi, H., et al. (2015). Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population. Health Economics, 24, 625–630.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Brazier, J., et al. (2007). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, N. E., et al. (2014). A multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: The BEEP trial protocol (ISRCTN: 93634563). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15, 254. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Wyrwich, K. W., et al. (2013). Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 22(3), 475–483.
The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208. CrossRef
Harrison, M. J., et al. (2008). The validity and responsiveness of generic utility measures in rheumatoid arthritis: A review. Journal of Rheumatology, 35(4), 592–602. PubMed
Flynn, T., et al. (2015). Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Economics, 24(3), 258–269.
Al-Janabi, H., et al. (2013). An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1831–1840.
Kind, P., Hardman, G., & Macran, S. (1993). UK population norms for EQ-5D, in discussion paper 172. Centre for Health Economics: The University of York.
Francis, J., & Byford, S. (2011). SCIE’s approach to economic evaluation in social care. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
- A longitudinal assessment of the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A in a randomised controlled trial of a knee pain intervention
N. E. Foster
- Springer International Publishing