Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

7 Vrouwelijke genitaliën

Auteurs : E. Hageraats, A.P. Gijsen

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Doel van het onderzoek van de vrouwelijke genitaliën is om zich een beeld te kunnen vormen van de toestand van de tractus genitalis van de vrouw. Door het gynaecologisch onderzoek is het mogelijk vulva, vagina, cervix, uterus, eileiders en ovaria te beoordelen. Zo kan de mogelijke aanwezigheid van bepaalde aandoeningen waarschijnlijk of minder waarschijnlijk gemaakt worden. Bovendien kan het onderzoek een rol spelen bij het evalueren van (gynaecologische oorzaken van) onderbuikklachten.

vorige hoofdstuk 6 Buik

volgende hoofdstuk 8 Mannelijke genitaliën

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Singh V, Sehgal A. Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection. BMJ. 1992;304(6826):534–5.CrossRef

Chirenje ZM, Chipato T. Visual inspection of the cervix as a primary means of cervical cancer screening: results of a pilot study. Centr Afr J Med. 1999;45(2):30–3.

Vooijs GP. Endocervical brush device. Lancet. 1989;1(8641):784.CrossRef

Fokke HE. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 1993;48:103–6.CrossRef

Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P, et al. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;335:28.CrossRef

Rask J, Lynge E, Franzmann M, et al. Impact of technology on cytology outcome in cervical cancer screening of young and older women. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:2168–79.CrossRef

Kirschner B, Simonsen K, Junge J. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer. Cytopathology. 2006;17:187–94.CrossRef

Harrison WN, Teale AM, Jones SP, Mohammed MA. The impact of the introduction of liquid based cytology on the variation in the proportion of inadequate samples between GP practices. BMC. 2007;7:191.

Boon ME, Rijkaart DC, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Korporaal H. Dutch solutions for liquid-based cytology: analysis of unsatisfactory slides and HPV testing of equivocal cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34;644–8.CrossRef

10.

Klinkhamer PJ, Meerding WJ, Rosier PF, Hanselaar AG. Liquid-based cervical cytology, a review of the literature with methods of evidence-based medicine. Cancer. 2003;99:263–71.CrossRef

11.

Ronco G, Confortini M, Maccalini V, et al. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening.] Epidemiol Prev. 2012;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.

12.

Whitlock EP, Vesco KK, Eder M, et al. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:687–97.CrossRef

13.

Rosmalen J van, Kok IM de, Ballegooien M van. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing. BJOG. 2012;119:699–709.CrossRef

14.

Igidbashian S, Boveri S, Radice D, et al. Performance of self-sampled HPV test in comparison with liquid based cytology. European J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014.

15.

Strauss RA, Eucker B, Savitz DA, Thorp JM Jr. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis from self-obtained vaginal swabs. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2005;13:31–5.CrossRef

16.

Schachter J, Chernesky MA, Willis DE, et al. Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea: results from a multicenter evaluation oft he APTIMA assays for both infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:725–8.CrossRef

17.

Pol B van der, Williams JA, Taylor SN, et al. Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis DANN by use of self-obtained vaginal swabs with the BD Probetec Qx assay on the BD Viper system. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:885–9.CrossRef

18.

Shafer MA, Pantell RH, Schachter J. Is the routine pelvic examination needed with the advent of urine-based screening for sexually transmitted disease? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:119–25.CrossRef

19.

Hoffman MS, Cardosi RJ, Roberts WS, et al. Accuracy of pelvic examination in the assessment of patients with operable cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:986–93.CrossRef

20.

Postema S, Pattynama PM, Berg-Huysmans A van den, et al. Effect of MRI on therapeutic decisions in invasive cervical carcinoma, direct comparison with the pelvic examination as a preoperative test. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:485–9.CrossRef

21.

Marks C. Diagnosing PID getting the balance right. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11:545–47.CrossRef

22.

Buckley R. History and physical examination to estimate the risk of ectopic pregnancy: validation of a clinical prediction model. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:644–7.CrossRef

23.

Wong E. Ectopic pregnancy – a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2000;7:189–94.CrossRef

24.

Dart RG. Predictive value of history and p.e. in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:283–90.CrossRef

25.

Close RJ. Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments. West J Med. 2001;175:240–4.CrossRef

26.

Essed G, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman N. Fysische diagnostiek – het vaginaal toucher. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;154(44).

27.

Dekel A, Farhi J, Levy T, et al. Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of nongravid, enlarged uteri-correlation with bimanual examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;80:205–7.CrossRef

28.

Padilla L, Radosevich D. Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88:84–8.CrossRef

29.

Padilla L, Radosevich D. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;4:593–98.

30.

Stewart R, Thistlethwaite J. Routine pelvic examination for asymptomatic women. Exploring the evidence. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37:493–6.

31.

Schutter EM, Kenemans P. Diagnostic value of pelvic examination, ultrasound and serum CA125 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass. An international multicenter study. Cancer. 1994;74:1398–406.CrossRef

32.

Buckshee K, Temsu I. Pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler sonography as predictors of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1998;61:51–7.CrossRef

Bickley LS. Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking. 11e druk. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

Hageraats E, Essed G. Vaardigheden in de geneeskunde: het gynaecologisch onderzoek. Maastricht: Mediview; 2007.

Jongh TOH de. Praktische vaardigheden. Houten: BSL; 2012. Hierin hoofdstukken en filmbeelden over afname fluor vaginalis, cervixuitstrijkje en spiraaltje plaatsen en verwijderen.

Meer J van der, Meer JWM van der. Anamnese en lichamelijk onderzoek. 7e druk. Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2014.

Swartz MH. Textbook of physical diagnosis, history and examination. 7e druk. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2014.CrossRef

Titel: 7 Vrouwelijke genitaliën
Auteurs: E. Hageraats
A.P. Gijsen
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Fysische diagnostiek
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-0892-7

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-0893-4

Copyright: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0893-4_7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen