Top

Gepubliceerd in:

29-08-2023

Wearable device adherence among insufficiently-active young adults is independent of identity and motivation for physical activity

Auteurs: Jingchuan Wu, Jenny L. Olson, Deborah Brunke-Reese, Constantino M. Lagoa, David E. Conroy

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 2/2024

Abstract

Wearable devices are increasingly being integrated to improve prevention, chronic disease management and rehabilitation. Inferences about individual differences in device-measured physical activity depends on devices being worn long enough to obtain representative samples of behavior. Little is known about how psychological factors are associated with device wear time adherence. This study evaluated associations between identity, behavioral regulations, and device wear adherence during an ambulatory monitoring period. Young adults who reported insufficient physical activity (N = 271) were recruited for two studies before and after the SARS-COVID-19 pandemic declaration. Participants completed a baseline assessment and wore an Actigraph GT3X + accelerometer on their waist for seven consecutive days. Multiple linear regression indicated that wear time was positively associated with age, negatively associated with integrated regulation for physical activity, and greater after (versus before) the pandemic declaration. Overall, the model accounted for limited variance in device wear time. Exercise identity and exercise motivation were not associated with young adults’ adherence to wearing the physical activity monitors. Researchers and clinicians can use wearable devices with young adults with minimal concern about systematic motivational biases impacting adherence to device wear.

vorige artikel Conservatism, anti-vaccination attitudes, and intellectual humility: examining their associations through a social judgment theory framework

volgende artikel Investigating the combined and unique contributions of positive psychological traits to sleep and exploring emotion regulation as a common mediator

Aadland, E., & Ylvisåker, E. (2015). Reliability of objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity in adults. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0133296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133296CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Anderson, D. F., & Cychosz, C. M. (1994). Development of an exercise identity scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3), 747–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/003151259407800313CrossRefPubMed

Anderson, D. F., Cychosz, C. M., & Franke, W. D. (1998). Association of exercise identity with measures of exercise commitment and physiological indictors of fitness in a law enforcement cohort. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21(3), 233–241.

Cho, S., Ensari, I., Weng, C., Kahn, M. G., & Natarajan, K. (2021). Factors affecting the quality of person-generated wearable device data and associated challenges: Rapid systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(3), e20738. https://doi.org/10.2196/20738CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015CrossRefPubMed

Conroy, D. E., Wu, J., Lee, A. M., Brunke-Reese, D., & Lagoa, C. M. (2023). Dose-response relations between the frequency of two types of momentary feedback prompts and daily physical activity. Health Psychology, 42(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef

D’Abundo, M. L., Sidman, C. L., Milroy, J., Orsini, M., & Fiala, K. (2014). Construct validity of college students’ responses to the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire (BREQ-2). Recreational Sports Journal, 38(1), 40–49.

Donaldson, S. C., Montoye, A. H., Imboden, M. T., & Kaminsky, L. A. (2016). Variability of objectively measured sedentary behavior. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(4), 755–761.CrossRef

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.CrossRefPubMed

Fjeldsoe, B. S., Goode, A. D., Phongsavan, P., Bauman, A., Maher, G., Winkler, E., & Eakin, E. G. (2016). Evaluating the maintenance of lifestyle changes in a randomized controlled trial of the ‘Get healthy, stay healthy’program. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), e5280.CrossRef

Frederix, I., Hansen, D., Coninx, K., Vandervoort, P., Vandijck, D., Hens, N., & Dendale, P. (2015). Medium-term effectiveness of a comprehensive internet-based and patient-specific telerehabilitation program with text messaging support for cardiac patients: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 17(7), e4799.CrossRef

Hassani, M., Kivimaki, M., Elbaz, A., Shipley, M., Singh-Manoux, A., & Sabia, S. (2014). Non-consent to a wrist-worn accelerometer in older adults: The role of socio-demographic, behavioural and health factors. PLoS One, 9(10), e110816.

Hojjatinia, S., Hojjatinia, S., Lagoa, C. M., Brunke-Reese, D., & Conroy, D. E. (2021). Person-specific dose-finding for a digital messaging intervention to promote physical activity. Health Psychology, 40(8), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Howie, E. K., & Straker, L. M. (2016). Rates of attrition, non-compliance and missingness in randomized controlled trials of child physical activity interventions using accelerometers: A brief methodological review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19(10), 830–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.520CrossRefPubMed

Huang, Y., Upadhyay, U., Dhar, E., Kuo, L. J., & Syed-Abdul, S. (2022). A scoping review to assess adherence to and clinical outcomes of wearable devices in the cancer population. Cancers, 14(18), 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Huisman, M., Krol, B., & Van Sonderen, E. (1998). Handling missing data by re-approaching non-respondents. Quality and Quantity, 32(1), 77–91.CrossRef

Kaewkannate, K., & Kim, S. (2016). A comparison of wearable fitness devices. Bmc Public Health, 16(1), 433. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3059-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kang, H. (2013). The prevention and handling of the missing data. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 64(5), 402–406. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34CrossRef

Lee, P. H., Macfarlane, D. J., & Lam, T. H. (2013). Factors associated with participant compliance in studies using accelerometers. Gait & Posture, 38(4), 912–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.018CrossRef

Liu, K., Daviglus, M. L., Loria, C. M., Colangelo, L. A., Spring, B., Moller, A. C., & Lloyd-Jones, D. M. (2012). Healthy lifestyle through young adulthood and the presence of low cardiovascular disease risk profile in middle age. Circulation, 125(8), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.060681CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Liu, L., Xiang, M., Guo, H., Sun, Z., Wu, T., & Liu, H. (2020). Reliability and validity of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire-2 for nursing home residents in China. Asian Nursing Research, 14(1), 11–16.CrossRefPubMed

Loprinzi, P. D., Cardinal, B. J., Crespo, C. J., Brodowicz, G. R., Andersen, R. E., & Smit, E. (2013). Differences in demographic, behavioral, and biological variables between those with valid and invalid accelerometry data: Implications for generalizability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 10(1), 79–84.CrossRefPubMed

Lu, L., Zhang, J., Xie, Y., Gao, F., Xu, S., Wu, X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Wearable health devices in health care: Narrative systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(11), e18907. https://doi.org/10.2196/18907CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McCann, D. A., Knowles, Z. R., Fairclough, S. J., & Graves, L. E. F. (2016). A protocol to encourage accelerometer wear in children and young people. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 8(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2016.1160949CrossRef

Migueles, J. H., Cadenas-Sanchez, C., Ekelund, U., Nyström, C. D., Mora-Gonzalez, J., Löf, M., et al. (2017). Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity and other outcomes: A systematic review and practical considerations. Sports Medicine, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0

Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035002CrossRefPubMed

Nelson, M. C., Story, M., Larson, N. I., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Lytle, L. A. (2008). Emerging adulthood and college-aged youth: An overlooked age for weight-related behavior change. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 16(10), 2205–2211. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.365CrossRefPubMed

Pépin, J. L., Bruno, R. M., Yang, R. Y., Vercamer, V., Jouhaud, P., Escourrou, P., & Boutouyrie, P. (2020). Wearable activity trackers for monitoring adherence to home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide: Data aggregation and analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e19787. https://doi.org/10.2196/19787CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Peterson, R. A., & Cavanaugh, J. E. (2020). Ordered quantile normalization: A semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era. Journal of Applied Statistics, 47(13–15), 2312–2327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372MathSciNetCrossRefPubMed

R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rhodes, R. E., Kaushal, N., & Quinlan, A. (2016). Is physical activity a part of who I am? A review and meta-analysis of identity, schema and physical activity. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1143334CrossRefPubMed

Roth, M. A., & Mindell, J. (2011). Who wears an accelerometer? Correlates of adherence to wearing an accelerometry motion sensor: The 2008 Health Survey for England. J Epidemiol Community Health, 65(Suppl 2), A27–A27. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2011.143586.60CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. Advances in motivation science (6 vol., pp. 111–156). Elsevier. In.

Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Thomas, S., Reading, J., & Shephard, R. J. (1992). Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 17(4), 338–345.PubMed

Tison, G. H., Avram, R., Kuhar, P., Abreau, S., Marcus, G. M., Pletcher, M. J., & Olgin, J. E. (2020). Worldwide effect of COVID-19 on physical activity: A descriptive study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(9), 767–770. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2665CrossRefPubMed

Troiano, R. P., McClain, J. J., Brychta, R. J., & Chen, K. Y. (2014). Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(13), 1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546CrossRefPubMed

Trost, S. G., Mciver, K. L., & Pate, R. R. (2005). Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37(11), S531–S543.CrossRef

Vlachopoulos, S. P., Kaperoni, M., & Moustaka, F. C. (2011). The relationship of self-determination theory variables to exercise identity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.006CrossRef

Vogels, E. A. (2020, January 9). About one-in-five Americans use a smart watch or fitness tracker. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/09/about-one-in-five-americans-use-a-smart-watch-or-fitness-tracker/. Accessed 5 September 2021.

Wierts, C. M., Faulkner, G., Rhodes, R. E., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2022). Psychological needs and exercise behaviour: A comparison of two psychological needs models. Psychology & Health, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2141484

Wilke, J., Mohr, L., Tenforde, A. S., Edouard, P., Fossati, C., González-Gross, M., et al. (2021). A pandemic within the pandemic? Physical activity levels substantially decreased in Countries affected by COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2235. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wilson, P. M., & Muon, S. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Exercise Identity Scale in a university sample. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2008.9671857CrossRef

Wilson, P. M., Rodgers, W. M., Loitz, C. C., & Scime, G. (2006). It’s who I Am… really!’The importance of integrated regulation in exercise contexts. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 11(2), 79–104.CrossRef

Titel: Wearable device adherence among insufficiently-active young adults is independent of identity and motivation for physical activity
Auteurs: Jingchuan Wu
Jenny L. Olson
Deborah Brunke-Reese
Constantino M. Lagoa
David E. Conroy
Publicatiedatum: 29-08-2023
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00444-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2024

The contribution of pain catastrophizing, depression and anxiety symptoms among patients with persistent pain and opioid misuse behaviours

Factors associated with HPV-associated sexual risk behaviors among sexually active college students

Factors associated with prior completion of colorectal cancer and hepatitis C virus screenings among community health center patients: a cross-sectional study to inform a multi-behavioral educational intervention

Using behavioral theory to understand partisan differences in COVID-19 vaccination and booster intentions

Exploring the use of self-management strategies for antiretroviral therapy adherence among women with HIV in the Miami-Dade County Ryan White Program

High study participation but diverging adherence levels: qualitatively unpacking PrEP use among adolescent girls and young women over two years in Eastern Cape, South Africa