Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
Omslag van het boek

2018 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

1. Validity

Auteurs : Dr. Arianne Verhagen, Drs. Jeroen Alessie

Gepubliceerd in: Evidence based diagnostics of musculoskeletal disorders in primary care

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This chapter covers all elements of the validity of diagnostic tests relevant for physiotherapists whenever one reads a research paper, or searches the literature for clinical relevant diagnostic tools necessary to set a diagnosis or develop a treatment plan. In this chapter I explain the different forms of validity, such as sensitivity, specificity and predictive value. Furthermore, I explain concepts such as a likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratios and ROC-curves (receiver operator curves), although these are more relevant for research than clinical practice.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, Riet G ter. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:417–23.CrossRef Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, Riet G ter. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:417–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhandari M, Guyatt GH. How to appraise a diagnostic test. World J Surg. 2005;29:561–6.CrossRef Bhandari M, Guyatt GH. How to appraise a diagnostic test. World J Surg. 2005;29:561–6.CrossRef
go back to reference Bie RA de, Vet HC de, Wildenberg FA van den, Lenssen T, Knipschild PG. The prognosis of ankle sprains. Int J Sports Med. 1997;18(4):285–9. Bie RA de, Vet HC de, Wildenberg FA van den, Lenssen T, Knipschild PG. The prognosis of ankle sprains. Int J Sports Med. 1997;18(4):285–9.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychol Bull. 1953;50(6):456–73.CrossRef Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychol Bull. 1953;50(6):456–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52(4):281–302.CrossRef Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52(4):281–302.CrossRef
go back to reference Davidson M. The interpretation of diagnostic tests: a primer for physiotherapists. Austr J Physiother. 2002;48:227–33.CrossRef Davidson M. The interpretation of diagnostic tests: a primer for physiotherapists. Austr J Physiother. 2002;48:227–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Hegedus EJ, Stern B. Beyond SpPIn and SnNOut: considerations with dichotomous tests during assessment of diagnostic accuracy. JMPT. 2009;17(1):E1–5. Hegedus EJ, Stern B. Beyond SpPIn and SnNOut: considerations with dichotomous tests during assessment of diagnostic accuracy. JMPT. 2009;17(1):E1–5.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guide to the medical literature III. How to use an article about diagnostic test B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 1994;271:703–7.CrossRef Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guide to the medical literature III. How to use an article about diagnostic test B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 1994;271:703–7.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaikkonen A, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. A performance test protocol and scoring scale for the evaluation of ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(4):462–9.CrossRef Kaikkonen A, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. A performance test protocol and scoring scale for the evaluation of ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(4):462–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Karlsson J, Peterson L. Evaluation of ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale. Foot. 1991;11:15–9.CrossRef Karlsson J, Peterson L. Evaluation of ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale. Foot. 1991;11:15–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Leeflang MM, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. CMAJ 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537–44. Leeflang MM, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. CMAJ 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537–44.
Metagegevens
Titel
Validity
Auteurs
Dr. Arianne Verhagen
Drs. Jeroen Alessie
Copyright
2018
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2146-9_1