Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander hoofdstuk

2018 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

2. Reproducibility

eerste hoofdstuk lezen

Auteurs: Dr. Arianne Verhagen, Drs. Jeroen Alessie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Gepubliceerd in: Evidence based diagnostics of musculoskeletal disorders in primary care

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Abstract

This chapter covers all aspects of reproducibility of diagnostic tests relevant for physiotherapists in daily practice. In daily practice knowledge about reproducibility of tests is relevant, especially when one reads a research paper, or searches the literature for clinical relevant diagnostic tools to tackle a clinical problem. I explain different elements of reproducibility, such as agreement, Kappa and correlation coefficients as well as the interpretation of these concepts.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

Evidence based diagnostics of musculoskeletal disorders in primary care

Meer informatie

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10. CrossRef

Bouter LM, Dongen MCJM, Zielhuis GA, Zeegers MPA. Leerboek epidemiologie. 7e druk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2016.

Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992;304:1491–4. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST. Reliability: what is it and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000;86(2):94–9. CrossRef

Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa, II: resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;50(43):551–8. CrossRef

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46. CrossRef

Cohen J. Weighed kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. 1968;70(4):213–20.

Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley; 1981.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74. CrossRefPubMed

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull. 1979;86:420–8. CrossRef

Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257–68. PubMed

Vet HCW de, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Hoekstra OS, Knol DL. Clinicians are right not to like Cohen’s K. BMJ. 2013;346:f2125.

Vet HC de, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–9.

Vet HCW de, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

Titel

Reproducibility

Boek

Evidence based diagnostics of musculoskeletal disorders in primary care

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2145-2

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2146-9

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2146-9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2146-9_2

Auteurs:

Dr. Arianne Verhagen
Drs. Jeroen Alessie

Uitgeverij

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Volgnummer

Hoofdstuknummer

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander hoofdstuk

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

Evidence based diagnostics of musculoskeletal disorders in primary care