Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
To describe a new approach for deriving a preference-based index from a condition specific measure that uses Rasch analysis to develop health states.
The CORE-OM is a 34-item instrument monitoring clinical outcomes of people with common mental health problems. The CORE-OM is characterised by high correlation across its domains. Rasch analysis was used to reduce the number of items and response levels in order to produce a unidimensional measure and to generate a credible set of health states corresponding to different levels of symptom severity using the Rasch item threshold map.
The proposed methodology resulted in the development of CORE-6D, a 2-dimensional health state descriptive system consisting of a unidimensional 5-item emotional component (derived from Rasch analysis) and a physical symptom item. Inspection of the Rasch item threshold map of the emotional component helped identify a set of 11 plausible health states, which, combined with 3 physical symptom item levels, form 33 plausible health states that can be used for the valuation of the instrument, resulting in the development of a preference-based index.
This is a useful new approach to develop preference-based measures from existing instruments with high correlations across domains. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years in people with common mental health problems.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J. A., & Tsuchiya, A. (2007). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Dolan, P. (1997). Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108. CrossRef
Brazier, J., Deverill, M., Green, C., Harper, R., & Booth, A. (1999). A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment,3(9), 1–164.
Tsuchyia, A., Brazier, J., McColl, E., & Parkin, D. (2002). Deriving preference-based single indices from non-preference based condition-specific instruments: Converting AQLQ into EQ5D indices. Sheffield Health Economics Group Discussion Paper 02/01. Sheffield: School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield. Available from http://www.shef.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/discussion.html.
Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., Brazier, J. E., & Young, T. A. (2007). Estimating a preference-based single index from the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ). Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion paper No. 07/02. Sheffield: School of Health and Related Research. Available from http://www.shef.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/discussion.html.
Chatfield, C., & Collins, A. J. (1980). Introduction to multivariate analysis. Cambridge: Chapman and Hall, University Press.
Young, T. A., Yang, Y., Brazier, J. E., & Tsuchiya, A. (2010). The use of Rasch analysis in reducing a large condition-specific instrument for preference valuation: The case of moving from AQLQ to AQL-5D. Medical Decision Making. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364846.
Sugar, C. A., Sturm, R., Lee, T. T., Sherbourne, C. D., Olshen, R. A., Wells, K. B., et al. (1998). Empirically defined health states for depression from the SF-12. Health Services Research,33(4 Pt 1), 911–928. PubMed
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2006). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., et al. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation-outcome measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,69(2), 184–196. PubMedCrossRef
Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., Marshall, C., & Twigg, E. (2005). Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry,186, 239–246. PubMedCrossRef
Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Marshall, C., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2003). Practice-based evidence: Benchmarking NHS primary care counselling services at national and local levels. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy,10, 374–388. CrossRef
Jacobs, R. (2009). Investigating patient outcome measures in mental health. CHE Research Paper Number 48. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Knapp, M., & Mangalore, R. (2007). “The trouble with QALYs…”. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale,16(4), 289–293. PubMed
Brazier, J. (2008). Measuring and valuing mental health for use in economic evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy,13(Suppl 3), 70–75. CrossRef
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research),57(8), 1358–1362. CrossRef
Smith, E. V., Jr. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement,3(2), 205–231. PubMed
Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters! (A Tale of Two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20(1), 1048–1051. Available from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt201c.htm.
SPSS for Windows ©, 11.5 (2002). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Andrich, D., Lyne, A., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2003). RUMM2020. Perth: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd. http://www.rummlab.com.
Fischer, W., Jr. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238. Available from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt63i.htm.
- Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM)
John E. Brazier
Tracey A. Young
- Springer Netherlands