Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Netherlands Heart Journal
Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Study design article

TWENTE Study: The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente: study design, rationale and objectives

Auteurs: M. W. Z. Basalus, K. Tandjung, K. G. van Houwelingen, M. G. Stoel, F. H. A. F. de Man, J. W. Louwerenburg, S. A. M. Saïd, G. C. M. Linssen, M. A. W. J. Kleijne, J. van der Palen, J. Huisman, P. M. J. Verhorst, C. von Birgelen

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 7/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Background. New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) may solve several problems encountered with first-generation DES, but there is a lack of prospective head-to-head comparisons between new-generation DES. In addition, the outcome of regulatory trials may not perfectly reflect the outcome in ‘real world’ patients.
Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of two new-generation DES in a ‘real world’ patient population.
Methods. A prospective, randomised, single-blinded clinical trial to evaluate clinical outcome after Endeavor Resolute vs. Xience V stent implantation. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure at one-year follow-up. In addition, the study comprises a two-year and an open-label five-year follow-up. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:360-4.)
vorige artikel Evaluation of the EuroSCORE risk scoring model for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a word of caution
volgende artikel Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language
Literatuur
1.
Mehilli J, Dibra A, Kastrati A, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Randomized trial of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in small coronary vessels. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:260-6.
2.
Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, Van den HP, Convens C, Bruining N, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2423-31.
3.
Briguori C, Colombo A, Airoldi F, Focaccio A, Iakovou I, Chieffo A, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2005;150:807-13.
4.
Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370:937-48.
5.
Kirtane AJ, Gupta A, Iyengar S, Moses JW, Leon MB, Applegate R, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies. Circulation. 2009;119:3198-206.
6.
McFadden EP, Stabile E, Regar E, Cheneau E, Ong AT, Kinnaird T, et al. Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Lancet. 2004;364:1519-21.
7.
Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, Abrecht L, Vaina S, Morger C, et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369:667-78.
8.
Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1903-13.
9.
Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, et al. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial. Circulation. 2009;119:680-6.
10.
Tsuchida K, Piek JJ, Neumann FJ, van der Giessen WJ, Wiemer M, Zeiher AM, et al. One-year results of a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in de novo coronary narrowings (The SPIRIT FIRST Trial). EuroIntervention. 2005;1:266-72.
11.
Meredith IT, Worthley S, Whitbourn R, Walters DL, McClean D, Horrigan M. et al. Clinical and angiographic results with the next-generation resolute stent system: a prospective, multicenter, first-in-human trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:977-85.
12.
Meredith IT, Worthley S, Whitbourn R, Walters D, Popma J, Cutlip D, et al. The next-generation Endeavor Resolute stent: 4-month clinical and angiographic results from the Endeavor Resolute first-in-man trial. EuroIntervention. 2007;3:50-3.
13.
Basalus MW, Ankone MJ, van Houwelingen GK, de Man FH, von Birgelen C. Coating irregularities of durable polymer-based drug-eluting stents as assessed by scanning electron microscopy. EuroIntervention. 2009;5:157-65.
14.
Basalus MW, von Birgelen C. Bench side testing of drug-eluting stent surface and geometry. J Interv Cardiol. 2010;2:159-75.
15.
Hezi-Yamit A, Sullivan C, Wong J, David L, Chen M, Cheng P, et al. Novel high-throughput polymer biocompatibility screening designed for SAR (structure-activity relationship): application for evaluating polymer coatings for cardiovascular drug-eluting stents. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009;12:664-76.
16.
Udipi K, Melder RJ, Chen M, Cheng P, Hezi-Yamit A, Sullivan C, et al. The next generation Endeavor Resolute Stent: role of the BioLinx Polymer System. EuroIntervention. 2007;3:137-9.
17.
Carter AJ, Brodeur A, Collingwood R, Ross S, Gibson L, Wang CA, et al. Experimental efficacy of an everolimus eluting cobalt chromium stent. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:97-103.
18.
Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Quee SC, Coleman L, Acampado E, et al. Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:333-42.
19.
Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1903-13.
20.
Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:2344-51.
21.
Vranckx P, Cutlip DE, Mehran R, Kint PP, Silber S, Windecker S, et al. Myocardial infarction adjudication in contemporary all-comer stent trials: balancing sensitivity and specificity. Addendum to the historical MI definitions used in stent studies. EuroIntervention. 2010;5:871-4.
22.
Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478-92.
23.
Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, O'Shaughnessy C, Ball MW, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2440-7.
24.
Popma JJ, Mauri L, O'Shaughnessy C, Overlie P, McLaurin B, Almonacid A, et al. Frequency and clinical consequences associated with sidebranch occlusion during stent implantation using zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:133-9.
25.
Mukherjee D, Moliterno DJ. Second-generation drug-eluting stents and the continuous need for rapidly available real-world data. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:1236-9.
26.
Fajadet J, Morice MC, Bode C, Barragan P, Serruys PW, Wijns W, et al. Maintenance of long-term clinical benefit with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: three-year results of the RAVEL trial. Circulation. 2005;111:1040-4.
27.
Stone GW, Lansky AJ, Pocock SJ, Gersh BJ, Dangas G, Wong SC, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1946-59.
28.
Galloe AM, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, Rasmussen K, Hansen PR, et al. Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:409-16.
29.
Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E, Wassing J, van Mieghem C, Goedhart D, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375:201-9
30.
Silber S. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials. J Interv Cardiol. 2006;19:485-92.
Metagegevens
Titel
TWENTE Study: The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente: study design, rationale and objectives
Auteurs
M. W. Z. Basalus
K. Tandjung
K. G. van Houwelingen
M. G. Stoel
F. H. A. F. de Man
J. W. Louwerenburg
S. A. M. Saïd
G. C. M. Linssen
M. A. W. J. Kleijne
J. van der Palen
J. Huisman
P. M. J. Verhorst
C. von Birgelen
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2010
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 7/2010
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03091792

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2010

Netherlands Heart Journal 7/2010 Naar de uitgave

Editorial

Evaluating operative mortality of cardiac surgery: first define operative mortality

Editor’s page

GENDER issues: media news value?

Special article

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language

Editorial

Towards a paradigm shift in atrial fibrillation

Special article

Dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation

Short communication

Migraine accompagnée after transseptal puncture